09-10-27 ALLEGED FRAUD IN COMPUTER OPERATIONS OF LA COUNTY JUSTICE
SYSTEM COMPOUNDED BY DENIAL OF ACCESS TO RECORDS - SEVERE ABUSE OF
HUMAN RIGHTS AND WIDESPREAD PUBLIC CORRUPTION.
(1) RECORDS OF INMATES HELD BY SHERIFF,
(2) ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT FOR FUNDS DERIVED FROM FEES IN ET (alleged Enterprise Track) CASES OF
THE LA-JR (alleged LA Judiciary Racket), WHICH ARE MARKED IN COURT RECORDS AS “JOURNAL
ENTRY”,
(3) LA SUPERIOR COURT’S CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO “SUSTAIN”.
(4) FAILURE TO REGISTER “RECEIVERSHIPS” AND THEIR ACCOUNTS IN AN AUDITABLE MANNER.
.
Don Knabe - Chair
.
August 27, 2009
.
Dear LA County Officials:
.
I am writing to communicate my concerns, in the hope that someone would contact me back
for further information.1 However, I recognize the multiplicity of conflicts – LA County is
named Defendant in two of the five cases that I provide below as examples of computer
based racketeering at the court. All Supervisors are listed as Defendants in one of the
cases. In fact, much of what is described below, can be seen as a direct extension of the
Rampart scandal (1998-2000). The latest officially commissioned report that I found in that
matter - the Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006), in fact refused to perform its charge
– to issue a “final report”, in lieu of the final report f the investigation, which the LAPD failed
to produced through all these years. Instead the Panel concluded that the notion that LA
County Justice System could investigate allegation of widespread corruption within itself
were unreasonable. It recommended an “external investigation.” In a letter to the Attorney
General of the U.S., draft of which is enclosed, I request the appointment of a Special
Counsel. I believe it is inevitable.
.
In fact, one must wonder how it came to be that investigation of the Rampart scandal - the
largest ever corruption scandal, was not removed by Federal agencies. The answer is
complex, but at least in part it reflects patronage by Federal agencies of the LA-JR for at
least a decade.
.
Here, I focused only on some cases of fraud in computer systems of the Los Angeles
County Justice System, since I believe that such frauds are the easiest to prove.
In reviewing a report by the Independent Auditor KPMG, I noticed that the Auditor also
focused on the issue of integrity and control of computer systems of LA County, albeit,
different systems than the ones indicated below. The alleged fraud in the systems below is
seen an affront and abuse of the Human Rights of all the 10 millions who reside in LA
County, California,
.
A. Alleged Fraud in the computer system of the LA County Sheriff Department. –
abused to deprive a citizen of his Liberty, and keep him jailed “off the count”,
“off the record” , in solitary confinement for over half a year.
...
B. Alleged Fraud in the computer system of the LA County Superior Court –
abused to deprive a citizen of his Liberty, and keep him jailed “off the count”,
“off the record”, and to deprive others of property and of other human rights.
...
C. I have no training – but I do have a proven track record – detecting alleged
fraud in the Beverly Hills School District computers
__/s/______
Joseph Zernik
Enclosed:
1) Appendix
2) Letter to Sheriff Baca
3) Draft Letter to U.S. Atty General
The complete record can be viewed at:
