Friday, November 27, 2009

09-11-27 Caracazo - Colombia - cases of the Interamerican Human Rights Court - wikipedia

Mapiripán Massacre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Mapiripán massacre)
Mapiripán Massacre
LocationMapiripán, Meta
Colombia
DateJuly 15 to July 20, 1997
Attack typeshooting, mass murder,massacre
Weapon(s)small arms
Death(s)unknown
Perpetrator(s)United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)

The Mapiripán Massacre was a massacre of civilians that took place in Mapiripán, Meta Department, Colombia. The massacre was carried out from July 15 to July 20, 1997 by Colombian paramilitaries, specifically the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC).

On July 12, 1997 two planeloads of paramilitaries arrived at the airport of San José del Guaviare, which also served as a base for anti-narcotics police. The paramilitaries then traveled through territories where the Colombian National Army manned checkpoints.

On July 15, 1997, the paramilitiaries arrived at Mapiripán. They used chainsaws and machetes tomurder, behead, dismember, and disembowel a number of civilians. Because the bodies were thrown into a river, it is unknown exactly how many people died.

In proceedings before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the government of Colombia has admitted that members of its military forces also played a role in the massacre, throughomission.[1] General Jaime Uscátegui allegedly ordered local troops under his command to stay away from the area in which the murders were taking place until the paramilitaries finished the massacre and left. Retired General Uscátegui was later prosecuted, put on trial, and subsequently acquitted.[2][3]

The 25th of November of 2009, the Superior Tribunal of Bogotá, revoked the previous sentence, and condemned General Uscátegui to 40 years of prison. [4]

One of the paramilitary leaders allegedly responsible for the massacre, Dumas de Jesús Castillo Guerrero, alias ‘Carecuchillo’, surrendered to authorities on May 20, 2008. after having been considered dead for half a year.[5]

[edit]See also

[edit]References

[edit]External links


09-11-27 Gold mining in Guatemala Interamerican Human Rights Court

RA header


(Goldcorp’s open pit, cyanide-leaching gold mine, San Miguel Ixtahuacan and (partially) Sipakapa municipalities, San Marcos Department, Guatemala)

March 30, 2008

LOCAL DEMOCRACY & INDIGENOUS RIGHTS versus GOLDCORP Inc. , GLOBAL INVESTORS, the CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, the “INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY”, Etc.

BELOW: Another photo-essay by James Rodriguez (http://www.mimundo-jamesrodriguez.blogspot.com). It is about the election of the ‘Sipakapa Civic Committee’ municipal government in Sipakapa (Guatemala) that favours community designed and controlled development and rejects the so-called “development” offered by the “international community” – ie, mining companies, global investors, G-8 like governments, World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, etc.

“The Sipakapa Civic Committee was formed three years ago by locals who have continually struggled to peacefully defend their territory and its natural environment from the perils posed by mining activities. Their main goal has always consisted of gaining political power so as to develop policies backed by the majority of the municipality’s population. It was a conscious decision to run under the independent figure of a Civic Committee, as none of the traditional political parties were willing to firmly stand against the presence in Sipakapa of Montana Exploradora, local subsidiary of Canada-based mining giant Goldcorp.”
“For us, development consists in protecting our natural wealth. And in particular, I believe good health is the most precious wealth one can have in the world”, continues Delfino Tema. “What good is it to have lots of money if one has an incurable disease? Even money can not buy another life. Good health is the most precious treasure we can possess. The main goal [these next four years] is to protect our territory and safeguard our health.”

WHAT TO DO? See below.

Dawn Paley, a Canadian writer and activist, is on a Rights Action speaking tour right now in Canada (Vancouver, Whitehorse) and north-west USA (Seattle to Portland), talking about North American mining companies, including Goldcorp Inc. She can be reached at: dawnpaley@gmail.com. For her schedule: info@rightsaction.org.

May 20 - Toronto: Goldcorp Inc’s Annual Shareholder Meeting is in Toronto. For information about education and activism around that time, in Toronto: info@rightsaction.org.

July 7-12 – Honduras: Rights Action is leading a delegation to Honduras to visit communities affected by Goldcorp Inc’s open pit, cyanide leeching gold mine there. For more info: info@rightsaction.org.

To get on-off this elist: info@rightsaction.org

* * *

DEFENDING OUR TERRITORY FROM PLUNDER
Sipakapa, San Marcos, Guatemala, January 19, 2008

After the historic triumph by the Sipakapa Civic Committee during the general elections of last September (please view the photo-essay: Here in Sipakapa, the People Won), Delfino Tema Baustista took charge as Municipal Mayor of Sipakapa on January 15, 2008.

Nevertheless, a number of celebratory events did not take place until Saturday, January 19.

Without a doubt, a mass given by Monsignor Alvaro Ramazzini, Bishop of San Marcos, turned into the main event: “The reason for our celebration today is to thank the Lord for our new municipal council which is the result of your effort and hard work. Little by little, all of you have been developing a higher conscience regarding your rights, responsibilities, and the need to have local authorities who will truly and continually seek the benefit of the people.”

“I invite you all to join me in prayer so that these men before me will truly become servants of the people, continually seek benefit for all, and that despite the dangers, the threats, the difficulties, the risks, the temptations, they will remain firm. Because the hard work starts now; we must always continue the struggle and not stop now just because we have won.”

“Lord, please accompany these brothers so that together, authorities and the people united can walk the paths towards welfare, increased social and economic development, and peace, in this beloved region of Sipakapa.”

(Goldcorp’s open pit, cyanide-leaching gold mine, San Miguel Ixtahuacan and (partially) Sipakapa municipalities, San Marcos Department, Guatemala)

“The Sipakapa Civic Committee was formed three years ago by locals who have continually struggled to peacefully defend their territory and its natural environment from the perils posed by mining activities. Their main goal has always consisted of gaining political power so as to develop policies backed by the majority of the municipality’s population. It was a conscious decision to run under the independent figure of a Civic Committee, as none of the traditional political parties were willing to firmly stand against the presence in Sipakapa of Montana Exploradora, local subsidiary of Canada-based mining giant Goldcorp.” (1)

(Dike built to contain growing lake of waste water, chemically contaminated from Goldcorp’s gold processing plant.)

In his first official interview as Mayor of Sipakapa, Delfino Tema declares: “Our principal goal is to defend our territory from the plunder of our natural resources by international corporations. We will continue our resistance against mining because life is worth much more than gold. Under no circumstances will we negotiate with Montana Exploradora [Goldcorp’s Guatemalan subsidiary] because that would go against the will of the people [of Sipakapa].”

The Sipakapa case has truly become a landmark one as it was the first municipality in Guatemala to organize a community consultation (or plebiscite) with regards to mining activities in its territory. Nearly one hundred percent of the population in Sipakapa rejected the gold mining license given to Montana Exploradora [Goldcorp subsidiary] by the Guatemalan Government. “The community consultation is a legal and peaceful process which gathers the population so as to allow them to implement their rights.”

Thanks to the example set by Sipakapa in 2005, more than 20 other municipalities nationwide have since organized and carried out mining consultations; all have rejected mining activities in their territories by landslides (please view the photo-essay: Sipakapa's Legacy). (2)

Nevertheless, Guatemala’s highest judicial power, the Constitutionality Court, deemed the landmark Sipakapa community consultation as legal yet not binding in May 2007. (3)

“The [federal] government protects the company rather than its own people... But the municipality of Sipakapa has a land title for all its territory. Hence, the land negotiations between company and individuals can occur, but such document empowers us above all and allows us to negate the permit... We have begun a legal process through the Inter-American Court on Human Rights (IACHR) so that our land titles are made valid.” (4)

“This document is the land title of Sipakapa as a whole. It is proven that Sipakapa is the sole owner of its own territory. The political Constitution of the Republic of Guatemala declares that all documents issued before 1956 are untouchable. Therefore, both titles available, one written in 1816 and the most recent one of 1918 are very important documents for the inhabitants of Sipakapa and its territory. The State of Guatemala has violated the private property right of all the people of Sipakapa by granting a mining license without previously consulting with the rightful owners.” (5)

Regarding the alternative plan for development proposed by the Civic Committee during its campaign, Delfino Tema explained that despite the problematic municipal budget, they hope to begin the development of alternative projects this first year “but without the use of municipal funds and instead with the aid of foreign or national cooperation and development agencies. We are focused on providing support for our agricultural sector because most of the people in Sipakapa belong to it.”

“We particularly seek to develop a fair-trade coffee brand, as well as the production of peaches and avocado. And, we are hopeful to find a market for our products, whether it is an international market or even industrialize our products at national level.” (6)

One of the first achievements by Delfino Tema’s newly elected municipal council has been the inclusion of residents of Sipakapa in the so-called Miracle Mission. “A health program created and ran by the Venezuelan Government of Hugo Chavez, it offers free eye surgeries of several degrees to low-income Latin Americans throughout the continent.”

The first group from Sipakapa, consisting of 26 patients, returned successfully from Venezuelan territory on March 9, 2008. Roughly, 125 more residents of Sipakapa are slated to participate in the Miracle Mission within the next few months. (7)

“For us, development consists in protecting our natural wealth. And in particular, I believe good health is the most precious wealth one can have in the world”, continues Delfino Tema. “What good is it to have lots of money if one has an incurable disease? Even money can not buy another life. Good health is the most precious treasure we can possess. The main goal [these next four years] is to protect our territory and safeguard our health.

1 Comisión Pastoral Paz y Ecología (COPAE). “El Comité Cívico toma posesión de la alcaldía de Sipacapa, San Marcos”. El Robre Vigoroso, No. 14. San Marcos, Guatemala. February 6, 2008.
2 Cofiño, Anamaría. “Sipakapa no se vende: El Estado no tiene capacidad para verificar los daños de las mineras”. elPeriodico, Guatemala, June 24, 2006. (http://www.elperiodico.com.gt/es/20060624/opinion/29095/)
3 Comisión Pastoral Paz y Ecología (COPAE). “Resolución de la Corte de Constitucionalidad ratifica la legitimidad de la consulta comunitaria”. El Robre Vigoroso, No. 9. San Marcos, Guatemala. June 19, 2007.
4 Interview with Delfino Tema Bautista; Municipal Mayor of Sipakapa, San Marcos, Guatemala. January 19, 2008.
5 Interview with Mario Tema Bautista; Sipakapa, San Marcos, Guatemala. January 20, 2008.
6 Delfino Tema Bautista. Op. Cit.
7 “Mayas Apuestan a Milagro de Venezuela para Ver” (http://www.terra.com/salud/articulo/html/sal4454.htm).

===

WHAT TO DO: info@rightsaction.org, www.rightsaction.org

EDUCATIONAL DELEGATION
From July7-12, Rights Action is leading an educational delegation to Honduras to investigate the territorial and human rights struggles of Indigenous/Garifuna peoples and community-based resistance to the environmental and economic harms and human rights violations being caused by Goldcorp Inc’s open pit, cyanide leeching mine. If interested: info@rightsaction.org.

3rd SOCIAL FORUM OF THE AMERICAS – GUATEMALA, OCTOBER 7-12, 2008
Form your own group and/ or join a Rights Action delegation to come to Guatemala around the time of the 3rd Social Forum of the Americas. More than 10,000 people from across the Americas are expected at this gathering to debate and discuss (and enjoy awesome music, art and theater) how Another World Is Possible … And Necessary. For more info: info@rightsaction.org.

RIGHTS ACTION
Based in Guatemala, Rights Action (with tax-deductible legal status in Canada and USA) funds and works with community-based development, environment and human rights organizations in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and southern Mexico (Oaxaca, Chiapas); and educates about and is involved in activism related to global development, environmental and human rights struggles.

TO MAKE TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATIONS for indigenous and community-based organizations that are working for justice and to end impunity, and to implement their own development, human rights and environment projects, make check payable to "Rights Action" and mail to: UNITED STATES: Box 50887, Washington DC, 20091-0887; CANADA: 422 Parliament St, Box 82552, Toronto ON, M5A 4N8. CREDIT-CARD DONATIONS: www.rightsaction.org.

JOIN: Rights Action’s listserv and newsletter lists.
CREATE YOUR OWN E-MAIL LIST: and re-distribute this and other information.
LISTEN: to the www.democracynow.org news program every day.
READ: Eduardo Galeano’s “Open Veins of Latin America”; Naomi Klein’s “The Shock Doctrine”; Paolo Freire’s “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”.
SMILE: And live to make another world is possible, everyday.

09-11-27 The Last Temptation - cases of the Interamerican Human Rights Court

The Last Temptation of Christ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Last Temptation of Christ
First UK trans. edition cover - titled "The Last Temptation"
AuthorNikos Kazantzakis
Original titleO Teleutaios Peirasmos
TranslatorPeter A. Bien (US)
CountryGreece
LanguageGreek
Genre(s)Religion, Historical novel
PublisherSimon and Schuster(USA) & Bruno Cassirer (UK)
Publication date1960
Media typePrint (Hardback &Paperback)
Pages506 pp (first edition, hardback)
ISBNISBN 0-684-85256-X
OCLC Number38925790

The Last Temptation of Christ (or The Last Temptation) is a novel written by Nikos Kazantzakis, first published in 1960. It follows the life of Jesus Christ from his perspective. The novel has been the subject of a great deal of controversy due to its subject matter, and appears regularly on lists ofbanned books.

The central thesis of the book is that Jesus, while free from sin, was still subject to every form oftemptation that humans face, including fear, doubt, depression, reluctance, and lust. Kazantzakis argues in the novel's preface that by facing and conquering all of man's weaknesses, Jesus struggled to do Yahweh's will, without ever giving in to the temptations of the flesh.

[edit]Film version

In 1988, an equally controversial film adaptation by Martin Scorsese was released. It stars Willem Dafoe as Jesus. The picture topped the list for the most complaints received for British TV.

[edit]See also

[edit]References

"Scorsese movie tops TV complaints list". Guardian Unlimited. 17 December 2003. Retrieved 5 January 2009.