10-11-30 10-11-30 Welcome Switzerland - Last New Visitor // Bienvenido Suiza - Visitante Mas Reciente!

             

Last New Visitor Switzerland Visited November 29, 2010

10-11-29 Alleged Corruption of US Supreme Court Dockets // La presunta corrupción de los EE.UU. Expedientes de la Corte Suprema

 

To: lawsters@googlegroups.comFrom: joseph zernik Subject: Re:Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation, et al. (10-411) -
  crooked courts and "order entered"Cc: bill@billwindsor.com

Hi Bob:

Same old, same old...

Bill Windsor writes: "An order was entered today by The Supreme Court ..." and as documentation of that fact he links us to the online docket of SCOTUS in Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation, et al (10-411).  [1]
In all US courts that were asked, the clerks refused to certify the online dockets.

Does Bill Windsor have in his possession an order, certified by a Justice of SCOTUS, and authenticated by an authorized Clerk of SCOTUS, to convince us that "an order was entered"?
As previously shown, [2] SCOTUS today practices that same very scam, used in other US courts, where dockets are published online, noting various rulings, orders, decisions, judgments, while in fact, there is no valid judicial record to provide the foundation for such online dockets... 

Mr Windsor, please show us the goods,...

The proposed solutions is two fold:

1) Placing the clerks of the US courts under sole authority of the US Attorney General, not the US Judges, and

2) Enactment of federal rules of electronic court records, to restore accountability of the clerks for electronic (including online) records, which today they deem themselves unaccountable for.
Joseph Zernik

LINKS:
[1]  Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation, et al (10-411) - Docket
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-411.htm
[2] 10-11-25 William Suter – Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States – Evidence of Public Corruption
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44034212/

At 07:45 PM 11/29/2010, Bob wrote:

Here’s a case in point.  Bill  Windsor complains that the SCOTUS will not protect him from crookedness of lower  courts.  It made him so mad he created a web site protesting it.

Imagine the mess if Windsor, Ken Smith, and everyone else screwed by crooked courts would work together to stop the crookedness.  They might actually succeed. But operating singly, they will only lose, one at a time.

Bob Hurt – http://bobhurt.com – 727 669 5511
2460 Persian Drive #70, Clearwater, Florida 33763 USA 

From: William M. Windsor [ mailto:williamwindsor@bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:56 AM
To: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Subject: Supreme Court says Judicial Corruption and Constitutional Violations are not worthy of their Consideration

An order was entered today by The Supreme Court on William M. Windsor’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari (appeal) of one of the most horrendous of the orders by the corrupt judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.  The Petition was denied.  See:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-411.htm

This may tell us how The Supreme Court will rule on judicial corruption and the ability for federal judges to void parts of the Constitution and Bill of Rights because essentially the same questions were asked as in my petitions for writs of mandamus:

“There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter.  These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons.  Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case.  The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court.

“The key questions are:

 

1.     Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts.

2.     Whether the Supreme Court is prepared to declare the Constitution and its amendments null and void.”

The differences are that The Supreme Court doesn’t have any obligation to deal with a petition for writ of certiorari, but they do have to deal with petitions for writs of mandamus.  In 2009, only 1.1 of 100 petitions for writs of certiorari were granted cert, which means they approved them for further consideration.  However, the reason for granting certiorari is allegedly when a case may set an important precedent.  With this decision, they had an opportunity to deal with the corruption, and didn’t….

I would have been surprised if they had granted this, but this is very discouraging.  I would think that if honest judges were told that the federal judges in Atlanta are corrupt and are violating the Constitution, they would act.  We’ll see what happens on the vital petitions for writs of mandamus, but I now suspect they will essentially void big hunks of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

What in the world are we going to do if they rule this way on the petitions for writs of mandamus?  We will know that our Supreme Court justices are corrupt, too.

I will continue to update the home page of www.lawlessamerica.com with the latest developments.

Please pass this news along.  One of our only hopes is if we can reach enough people through email because the mainstream media is afraid of the judges.

William M. Windsorbill@billwindsor.com
Office: 770-578-1094

10-11-29 TIKKUN's Rabbi MICHAEL LERNER, is asked re: The Los Angeles Jewish Community and the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) // El rabino Michael Lerner, se preguntó sobre la comunidad judía de Los Ángeles y el PFE de Rampart (Personas Falsamente Encarceladas)

Rabbi Michael Lerner, Editor - Tikkun Magazine (to heal, repair, and transform the world)


Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
RE: TIKKUN's Rabbi MICHAEL LERNER, is asked re: The Los Angeles Jewish Community and the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons)
Dear Rabbi Lerner:

Thanks again for your response on the previous question, affirming the ethical duties of Bet Tzedek (The House of Justice) and the Los Angeles Jewish Federation in an unrelated matter.

Here is an question regarding a fundamental issue, which I believe that you could and should address:

1) Should the Los Angeles Jewish community consider it part of its duties and responsibilities to initiate actions for the release of the Los Angeles Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - mostly black and latinos - victims of conduct of the Los Angeles, California courts?
The Los Angeles Jewish community is vastly over-represented among judges and attorneys in Los Angeles, and the ongoing imprisonment of the Rampart-FIPs is contrary to Jewish values and the historic commitment of the Jewish community to Civil Rights in the United States.

The basic facts in the matter were established over a decade ago during the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) and through a series of investigative committee reports that followed: [1]

• The number of the Rampart-FIPs is unknown, but was estimated at many thousands [2].
• The Rampart-FIPs are mostly black and latinos.
• Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the University of California, Irvine Law School, a renowned Jewish constitutional scholar found the matter sufficiently important that he initiated his own independent investigation of the matter and published his report, stating: "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." (2001) [3]
• Prof David Burcham, then Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School wrote: "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
• The Rampart-FIPs were falsely convicted and sentenced to long prison terms through framing of evidence, through extraction of confessions under torture, and through fraud on the courts. 
• Regardless, local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies have refused to release the victims to this date.  
• The case was described as the largest court corruption scandal in the history of the US. 
• The Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) documented that release of the Rampart FIPs is opposed by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court under claims that it would lead to 'collapse of the justice system' [4] - an argument that defies logic and any sense of decency.

I hope that you would find time to respond on this question, helping to repair a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions taking place under our watch, here in California.

Happy Hanukkah to you and your family!

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)
WHAT DID THE LAPD BLUE RIBBON REVIEW PANEL REPORT (2006) SAY ABOUT THE RAMPART-FIPs? [4]
*     Innocent people remain in prison.
*     ...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/

WHAT DID PROF ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, DEAN, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LAW SCHOOL, SAY ABOUT THE RAMPART-FIPs? [2]
*   This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

WHAT DID PROF DAVID BURCHAM, DEAN, LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL, LA SAY ABOUT THE RAMPART FIPs? [3]
*   ...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit.
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/

WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA? [5]
*   ...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
WHAT DID THE LATE WILLIAM BRENNAN JR SAY ABOUT HABEAS CORPUS?
*   The basic principle of the Great Writ of habeas corpus is that, in a civilized society... if the imprisonment cannot be shown to conform with the fundamental requirements of law, the individual is entitled to his immediate release.
Fay v Noia (1963)
LINKS:
[1] 09-12-17 Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review
http :// www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/
[2] Rampart False Imprisonments - PBS Frontline (2001), in: Frontline series: LAPD Blues
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24901612/
[3] Chemerinsky, E: The Rampart Scandal and the Criminal Justice System in Los Angeles County, Guild Practitioner 57:121 (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
[4] Burcham, DW and Fisk, CL: Policing the Justice System, in: Symposium, The Rampart Scandal: Policing the Criminal Justice System, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 34:537 (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
[5] United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report, as part of Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
 
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://inproperinla.com/
_______________________________________