tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2730438587195730371.post7176772960145245287..comments2023-08-21T02:19:47.556-07:00Comments on IN PRO PER IN L.A. // בעצמו, בלתי מיוצג: 10-12-25 Cookbook Recipe: Invalid Cases in the US District Courts and Courts of Appeals // Los casos no válidos en los EE.UU. Juzgados de Distrito y los Tribunales de Apelaciones // 无效的案件在美国地区法院和上诉法院Human Rights Alert (NGO)http://www.blogger.com/profile/11181468334537915899noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2730438587195730371.post-91572399678199087202011-01-24T20:25:45.885-08:002011-01-24T20:25:45.885-08:00I recently received a court document with the elec...I recently received a court document with the electronic signature of the assigned US District Court Judge. This document was a denial of all my motions, rule 15 (followed) amendment, and my Response to the Defendants answer to the Complaint which was a pleading of particularity and attached to my Motion to Disqualify Counsel and strike their affirmative Defenses of which by law none stood, including case law for this very court. I backed my response with appeals court circuit 7 authority that states it is OK to attach pleadings to a motion as well as rule 9 documentation. I wanted Defense Counsel disqualified because it was the same law firm of which an attorney of theirs broke multiple title 18 violations when this action commenced before a federal agency. The federal agency ignored the facts and creatively ignored all law, rules, and their own regulations. There was a large money transaction by the Defendant just a few days before the Attorney hand delivered the Defendant's Position Statement to the federal agency. Now in federal court since August but yet to see a judge. No scheduling order--No status conference--Motions for same ignored. I am filing electronically. I researched the documents I receive from the court and they are created by the Court's Pro Se Staff Attorney and she signs with the judge’s electronic signature. I even received one on a Sunday afternoon. Yea right, the judge was at work on a Sunday. She manipulates the filing date. It is one of these fraudulent memorandums and orders I received just after I motioned to enjoin this fool (Barbara Morse and she is on the ethics committee) from my case. The total document void of rule, law, fact and a legal signature. She changed the font that I had pointed out she was using as compared to the font the judge uses but the PDF properties still name her as the author and this document does not come up on the all recent opinions link. I have written the Chief Judge--nothing. The inmates are running the asylum. I am happy I am 3000 miles away from where this case is taken place; I do not feel safe. This is RICCO with collusion by the attorneys, the court attorney and the federal agency and they have no fear of court because nothing ever sees a judge as they see to it that you are blacklisted from employment and too poor to afford an attorney so all goes through these pro se staff attorneys. The name is catchy--one would think they are there to help the pro se litigant and they even put out publications on how the court can help the pro se litigant but there is no access to the court for the pro se litigant. This is in the US District Court of Massachusetts. I am disabled and they are breaking federal law thru oppression of this disabled person as they deny me my constitutional rights, and intimidate me with threats of sanctions. I am unsure if the judge's have a clue or not because you cannot get to them all communication is intercepted by court staff--even US Mail. They have fraud thru the ECF system mastered. There was even 6 files switched in the ECF and I have the docket proof where my case was entered and a note stating an action by the clerk yet no action taken or needed because what he said he did I had already done. These judges are letting the computer savvy generation run the court and have not a clue; if they are aware we are in even graver trouble.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2730438587195730371.post-16775051505963037852010-12-25T21:39:08.492-08:002010-12-25T21:39:08.492-08:00The best response I got from a reader so far descr...The best response I got from a reader so far described the situation in the US courts, which is described in the recipe below as "spontaneous rapid self dis-assembly".<br />In my opinion, the same term could be useful in describing a few other areas of the US government today, beyond the US courts.Human Rights Alert (NGO)https://www.blogger.com/profile/11181468334537915899noreply@blogger.com