09-11-12 RE: July 12, 2009 Should Judge Jacqueline Connor be deemed FLIM FLAM ARTIST, or simply a RACKETEER? RE: JULY 12, 2007

Should Judge Jacqueline Connor be deemed Flimflam artist, or simply a racketeer?

RE: July 12, 2007 - Disqualification for a Cause, and alleged falsification of court records in the response.

Judge Jacqueline Connor

Alleged Racketeer

In mid July, it got really busy... Judge Connor was soon going on vacation, and she had to pack several alleged frauds at the same time... Well, I guess I am giving my opinion already, can't help it... Judge Connor is by no means a FLIM FLAM... FLIM FLAM is short term... maybe John Segal... But Judge Connor could plan ahead an allege fraud for two years... e.g. - Statute of frauds fraud.. she started it before October 2005, she had to plan it with Samaan;s then attorney Jay Stein... and she was proceeding with it slow and steady till August of 2007...

Another way to look at it, it to try to count how many alleged frauds she was perpetrating at the same time, let's say, July 12, 2007. My taxonomy of frauds goes like this:

1) Fundamentals

2) Overarching

3) Intermediate

4) Short.

She could easily carry at the same time two items from each category, and then respond in a blink to any new challenge with a new FLIM FLAM... But that is stretching it a bit, and then performance is not as good as it should be...

On July 6, 2007 she ran for Countrywide an "off the record" proceeding... I mention it, because it is again the same conduct of an enterprise in a pattern.... as seen by Judge David Yaffe with Richard Fine... The March 4, 2009 proceeding that was reported in media, simply did not happen... The media got completely confused. Just because they were there, it did not give the reality any validity. Judge Yaffe decided that it was not a proceeding, and therefore it was not a proceeding. That was why he did not understand what the fuss was all about - he never even jailed Richard Fine. They just had this discussion about the language of a potential judgment, but it was all off the record. He heard that the Warrant Detail later took Richard Fine somewhere, maybe to Twin Towers Jail... probably Richard Fine misbehaved... But it had nothing to do with Judge Yaffe for sure...

By the time that Judge Connor ran the "off the record" hearing for Countrywide - obviously alleged perversion and corruption and obstruction, and what not - I was looking for a few months for an attorney to help me write Disqualification for a Cause. I was clueless, but no attorney in Los Angeles would dare help me, even not anonymously... She established a reputation as retaliatory...

At the end, I wrote it myself, and I had with me as witness an attorney that I hired from Orange County.. He did not even know what was going on, only a few minutes before we went in, I told him I was going to serve her with Disqualification for a Cause. I guess he figured out he would never come back to LA, so he did not turn around.

At that time, strange as it may sounds, I still did not read the Rampart papers. But the disqualification was entirely based on the issue of ----- FAKE ERRORS. I said that I did not know anything about her relationships with other parties. But what she tried to pull off in Court as ERRORS, statistically simply cannot be ERRORS... It was something totally different. The reasons were simple:

1) The FAKE ERRORS were clusters in sequences, not randomly spread in time, and

2) The FAKE ERRORS were always harmful to one party and not the other.

I referred to Brandeis Brief for the validity of such argument based on statistics alone, with no legal theories.

I mention it here, because again, it is the same pattern with David Yaffe and Richard Fine. I showed that there were 8 rulings, orders and judgments in a row that Judge David Yaffe made errors on... Even if he has some drinking problem... which I don;'t think is the case, one can review some other files and check what the likelihood of that happening in a manner that would harm a corporation.. for example.... In short- the chance of 8 of those going in a row is so small that it would be beyond reasonable doubt.

That was the argument I used for the disqualification. This way I avoided any reliance on rulings, opinions, bias perceived or not...

1) Dr Zernik’s paper:

Opposition to NON PARTY Countrywide illegitimate motion for a protective Order And Filing for the purpose of immediate disqualification for a cause per CCP §170.3

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-court-filing_07-07-12-zernik-disqual-for-cause-and-oppose-cfc-s.pdf

Judge Connor was in the middle of too many alleged frauds on that day, and this was a total surprise. But it did not take her more than a fraction second... the responded with an "FAKE ERROR", on the spot she ruled it was a Peremptory Challenge pursuant to CCP 170.6, untimely, struck, done, let's go on... You can read it in the Transcript.

2) Transcript of July 12. 2007

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-transcripts-07-07-12-first-disqaulification-of-judge-connor-s.pdf

What happened after that is not clear to me, and is not her usual self... She is usually so planned and precise in these thing... Here, she decided on July 23, 2007, later than the 10 days provided by law, to enter a written response to disqualification for a cause. And usually the rule was - no notice to Zernik, only to Sheppard Mullin. But here, she wanted it with a certificate of mailing by clerk. I believe that Vivian Jaime refused to do it. maybe because the 170.3 et seq talks specifically about the duties of the clerk in such situation.

The end result is messy: There are three papers that you cannot explain as honest anyway you try:

3) Electronic copy of minute order: - it shows on the last page, that the true day that she entered it was July 23, 2007, later than 10 days, and therefore - she had by law no authority to do it , or to do anything else in this case.From electronic Court file: Notice on the last page the true machine stamp of the date fo etnry – July 23, 2007

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-court-filing_07-07-12-disqualification-for-a-cause-electronic.pdf

4) From paper court file:

Notice of Ruling by Mohammad Keshavarzi (Sheppard Mullin):

Purported hand delivery to offices where there were never offices, and nobody to receive hand delivery… With Proof of service July 19, 2007 Order Denying peremptory Challenge and striking statement of disqualification:

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-court-filing_07-07-12-disqualification-for-a-cause-paper-court-file.pdf

5) From paper court file:

The same, but as a minute order with what looks like certificate of mailing by judge for herself. July 12, 2007

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-court-filing_07-07-12-mo-disqualification-for-a-cause-paper.pdf

This last one was really strange... she could not find L Aldornato to sign?

Needless to say, these records and hundreds of other minute orders, demonstrate that Sustain is routiely used to backdate records, by dates, weeks, months, years, you name it... falsification of trial court litigation records-'

As routine... not an exception...

Should Judge Jacqueline Connor be deemed FLIM FLAM ARTIST, or simply a RACKETEER?

RE: July 12, 2007 - Disqualification for a Cause, and alleged falsification of court records in the response.

_____________________________________

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of

judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are

among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the

fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in

charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.