Sunday, November 22, 2009

09-11-22 More on PACER & CM/ECF and what is wrong at the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles....

PACER & CM/ECF at the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles are materially different from other installations of the system in other court around the country. The deficiencies are also likely to be out of copliance with both State of California and U.S. Law.
_________________
Washington DC:
CM/ECF












_________________
California, Central District:
CM/ECF

Reports


Docket Report
Docket Sheet

Civil Reports
Judgment Index

Civil and Criminal Reports
Written Opinions





_________________

The Public is Denied Access in Califronia Central District to:
  1. Calendar of the Courts
  2. Docket Activity Report
Both are reports that are critical in the safeguard of the integrity of the courts

Questions:
  1. How was the decision made to deny the access to these reports in California?
  2. Was this decision pursuant to Rules of Court?
  3. Was this decision pursuant to FRCP?

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcome... especially any tips regarding corruption of the courts in Los Angeles. Anonymous tips are fine. One simple way to do it is from internet cafes, etc.