Monday, December 7, 2009

09-12-07 Bed-in, levitation by meditation, Kozinski Frauds, Why Kozinkski must resign, computer validation, etc...

Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:44:47 -0800
To: "Bonnie Russell" "Sean Harrington"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: (1) Bed-in, (2) Levitation by meditation, (3) Kozinski Fraud, (4) Why Kozinski must immediately resign, (5) Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights, (6) The US courts and US judiciary as central to the current Economic/Integrity Crisis, (7) Validation and/or Functional Logic Verification of US large computers systems
RE: (1) Bed-in, (2) Levitation by meditation, (3) Kozinski Fraud, (4) Why Kozinski must immediately resign, (5) Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights, (6) The US courts and US judiciary as central to the current Economic/Integrity Crisis, (7) Validation and/or Functional Logic Verification of US large computers systems

Dear Attorney Russell:

Indeed, the 1969 Amsterdam Bed-in by John Lennon and Yoko Ono was a huge success.

See full size image
Bed-in by John and Yoko, Amsterdam, 1969

However, based on your previous communications I had no way to realize that the two of us shared this philosophy. Mistakenly, I assumed that you were most inclined to engage in a no-nonsense legal discussion, based on facts, law, reference to specific cases, etc. That was the reason I provided you such information - again - copied below.
Do you also subscribe to levitation by meditation? Ever since the 1967 Abbie Hoffman success in levitating the Pentagon I have considered myself a fan of that technique as well.

[]
Abbie Hoffman's Levitation of the Pentagon - by meditation, 1967.

Following your initial constructive comments, your contribution to a focused discussion on the matters themselves was eagerly anticipated, in re: False Imprisonment of Attorney Richard Fine and Demand for the immediate resignation of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski for perpetrating a Kozinski Fraud from the bench.

Given Kozinski's high position, second only to the justices of the US Supreme Court, and the serious nature of the accusations, the matter was crucial in regards to representation of the US Courts as national tribunals that protected the Civil, Constitutional, and Human Rights of residents of this country in compliance with ratified International Law.

Moreover, the US courts and the US judiciary, through their conduct, were alleged in previous communications as central to the current Economic/Integrity Crisis, which crippled the US, and inflicted harm on both investors and workers world-wide. Such conduct amounted to a deliberate refusal to enforce the law on large financial institutions, particularly - regarding alleged criminality at Bank of America Corporation and prior to that - alleged criminality at Countrywide Financial Corporation. Such conduct also stood contrary to representation of the US as a good-faith party to the Basel Accords (1988/1996 and 2004) on Banking Supervision.

Key feature shared by all deficiencies listed above was claimed to be the evident failure of the US government to implement effective validation and/or functional logic verification, subject to public oversight and/or public accountability, of large computer systems that were implemented in recent decades in government agencies, including, but not limited to the courts and correctional facilities, and also in large financial institutions and public corporations. The manner in which such systems were implemented in courts across the US, both state and federal, was also claimed to have violated state and/or federal rulemaking enabling acts. The conduct of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts in re: PACER and CM/ECF was pointed out as requiring immediate scrutiny.

The favor of a response on the facts and/or on the law, as outlined in my December 6, 2009 message, copied below, would be greatly appreciated.

Joe Zernik

CC

1) Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
University of Chicago Law School[]

2) Law school faculty


4) Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice , as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.


4) Other Inspector Generals
As an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.

5) Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As an addendum to request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.


6) NavanNaethem Pillay, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights
See full size image

7) Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee

II. The Usual

[]
IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!


"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.
_______________________________________
X-MSK: CML=3.501000
From: "Bonnie Russell"
To:
Cc: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:11:49 -0800
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598
X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0;
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;

Sean and others.
Again, please remove me from this list.

Or, who do I need to sleep with to get off this list?
Please advise. I'll send in a stand-in. Or, lie-in.
Thanks.

Bonnie
______________________________________

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcome... especially any tips regarding corruption of the courts in Los Angeles. Anonymous tips are fine. One simple way to do it is from internet cafes, etc.