09-12-13 Alleged widespread corruption in administration of state courts- LA County as an example

Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:36:57 -0800
To: "judicial reform list"
From: joseph zernik

December 12, 2009

Hi G and judicial reform list:

Thank you for the response, I appreciate it, you helped me in improving the questionnaire. Your response, copied below, appeared to describe your local variation of the so called Kozinski Fraud. Finally - we are focused back on the cause - denial of access to court records - and variations on the Kozinski Fraud - alleged widespread fraud in the administration of state courts across the US - underlying the current economic/integrity crisis and the Richard Fine case.

In this email we leave behind the Federal Courts, and the alleged large scale fraud on the American people in the operation of dual docketing systems of PACER & CM/ECF, installed by the Administrative Office of the US Courts with no authority at all, and in alleged violation of the Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC 2071 - 2077.

state courts alone are the subject of this email:

1) Requesting help in surveying integrity, or lack thereof in state courts
Could you please add Yes/No for (a) through (f) below? [1] Use more space as necessary and links to records, but please provide short overall description in the response itself. This questionnaire is about state courts only, and I am asking for the name of the state and the county as well. Thanks again, this would be great help! Please also provide additional information regarding conduct of the courts relative to verification of orders and judgments by judges (signatures and dates) or lack thereof, and attestations by clerks, or lack thereof (see comments at bottom of this email note). These two areas appear to be most common theme in the alleged widespread frauds in the administration of both federal and state courts in the US today - the so called Kozinski Fraud.

2) Refusal of US Government to perform its duties pursuant to ratified International Law
I would be grateful for responses from other states and counties... I am seeking the data for arguing before International Human Rights courts the failure and refusal of US Gov to provide Equal Protection in LA County in general, and in the case of Richard Fine in particular. Such refusal persisted even after inquiries by the Honorable Diane Watson - Congresswoman and the Honorable Dianne Feinstein - Senator in August 2008 on FBI and US Dept of Justice.

3) Conditions in LA County, California as a detailed example for the background for the current economic/integrity crisis and the Richard Fine case
I will scan and post my correspondence with the California Superior Court. County of Los Angeles, regarding the denial of access to dockets... It is a serious violation of human rights, I believe. There is no possible explanation why an honest court would deny such access. The only plausible explanation, was in what was stated before regarding the Richard Fine case - that the LA Superior Court routinely mixed up real True Court Track cases, and sham cases, and to cover it up, the court concealed the dockets and denied access to court records. The Richard Fine case [2][3] was from the sham track - the Equity/Enterprise Track:
a) "Equity" refers to the evidence from a couple of cases - that the judges considered themselves presiding in an "Equity Court", not subject to California or US law (hence the futility of efforts for disqualification)!
b) "Enterprise" - designation for such conduct, is in reference to RICO enterprises...

4) Evidence for operation of the Equity/Enterprise Track at the LA Superior Court
The best evidence for the existence of the Equity/Enterprise Track at the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles came from the following:
a) The fees collected from Equity/Enterprise Track cases were listed as "Journal Entry", and the Clerk of the Court - John A Clarke, and the Presiding Judge of the Court - Charles McCoy, refused to answer what the final designation of such "Journal Entry" funds was.
b) No valid and effectual orders or judgments were ever issued in Equity/Enterprise Track cases, only "false on their faces" orders and judgments. That was the alleged reason why there was no warrant for the arrest and no booking papers for Richard Fine, and why all orders and judgments in his case were "false on their faces". [4] Such orders and Judgments were of they type designated Kozinski Fraud.
c) None of the judges presiding in Equity/Enterprise Track ever held a valid Assignment Order, and even after motions before the Presiding Judge, he refused to issue such Assignment Orders.
d) Although the specialty of the Equity/Enterprise Track was claimed to be in real estate and financial institution fraud, [5] the outcome was invariably - fraud in conveyance of title. [6] The court never issued valid, effectual, honest Grant Deeds, because no Writ of Executions were issued either.

The operation of the double track - True Court Track vs Equity/Enterprise Track was the only plausible explanation for the denial of access to the dockets (California - Registers of Actions) in LA County, California.

Truly,

Joe Zernik

I. Footnotes
[1] Questionnaire: Access and authenticity of state court records
Questions: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Answers for < > County, state of < >
a) Are you allowed to see your docket?_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Y/N
b) Are you served by mail you minute orders?_ _ _ _ _ Y/N
c) Do you have access to the calendar of the courts?_ _ Y/N
d) Do you have access to the Index of All Cases?_ _ __ _ Y/N
e) Do you have access to Index of Judgments?_ _ _ _ __ Y/N
f) What type of payments are involved, if any. use more space as necessary
g) What is the typical manner in which orders/judgment are verified (signed) by judges? Please provide short description of problems in this area, if any.
h) What is the typical manner of attestation by clerks (Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry, Proof of Service, etc)? Please provide short description of problems, if any.
[2] Marina v LA County (BS109420) - Los Angeles Superior Court denied multiple requests to access the docket (Register of Actions) in this case, and Habeas Corpus petition to the US District Court, Los Angeles, and emergency petition to the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, were reviewed in the absence of such record, quintessential for providing the foundation for any other litigation records.

[3] The Richard Fine case:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[4] Detailed analysis of a series of eight (8) false on their faces orders and judgments in the case of Richard Fine.
09-10-23.List of eight (8) consecutive rulings, or...
[5] Similar finding - routine real estate financial institution/real estate frauds by the court were also found in the neighboring San Bernardino County, California, where the former Presiding Judge of the Court was reported to have been involved in numerous such cases.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[6] Equity/Enterprise Track: Example of fraud in conveyance of title by the LA Superior Court, as opined by highly decorated FBI veteran. The fraud in this case was in collusion with Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation.
http://inproperinla.com/07-12-17-grant-deeds-wedick-s-opinion-s.pdf

II. Previous communications in this string
____________________________________
This is g's writing (condensed)
At 18:00 12/12/2009, G wrote:

I feel pretty lucky ....our dockets are posted for free, you can go to the courts and review the docket,
but we are not allowed to have signed orders from real judges.
All of arts or rubber stamp facsimiles from the court clerk and the orders are seldom in the file signed afterwards.

___________________________________
This is jz's writing:
Hi G:
This is important information. What you are describing is your local variation of the Kozinski Fraud. My questions are:
1) Is this all in reference to state court?
2) What is the typical form of authentication of orders and judgments in your state court?
a) Notice of service and entry of Order/Judgment by clerk?
b) Proof of Service by party?
c) Digital signatures of some sort?
Thanks for any responses on the matter.
Joe Zernik

This is jz's writing:

--- On Sat, 12/12/09, joseph zernik wrote:

From: joseph zernik

Subject: Getting to the heart of the matter - access to court records in the digital era.

To: "Jz12345@Earthlink. Net"

Date: Saturday, December 12, 2009, 3:28 PM

Let's get to the heart of the matter, what unites us in this discussion. I am curious regarding the Common Law right to access court records, to inspect and to copy - Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978).

If you have a civil case in the Superior Court in your state and county:

Questions: Answers for LA County, California

a) Are you allowed to see your docket? NO

b) Are you served by mail you minute orders? NO

c) Do you have access to the calendar of the courts? NO

d) Do you have access to the Index of All Cases? NO

e) Do you have access to Index of Judgments? NO

f) What type of payments are involved, if any. [1]

[1] In some situations, where one would be allowed to view the docket in Los Angeles County (Register of Actions) each view may cost $25-75, depending on the size of the document, at $0.50 per page.

I am trying to figure out how usual or unusual conditions in LA County are for the USA 2009. I would be grateful if responders name the state and county, and answer each of the 5 questions, as in a questionnaire.

Joe Zernik

III. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.

IV. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.