09-12-09 Sharon Stone; Beyonce; Richard Fine; December 10, 2009 US House Judiciary Committee hearing on disqualification of judges;

Sharon Stone - knows more than most attorneys about disqualifications and corruption at the Los Angeles Superior Court

Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:55:24 -0800
To: jeffandmary@ozarkopathy.org
From: joseph zernik
Subject: (1) Sharon Stone, (2) Beyonce, (3) Richard Fine, (4) December 10, 2009 US House Judiciary Committee hearing on disqualification of judges, (5) Integrity of the US judiciary and financial institutions - or lack thereof... Alternatively - why Alex Kozinski must resign!

(1) Sharon Stone, (2) Beyonce, (3) Richard Fine, (4) December 10, 2009 US House Judiciary Committee hearing on disqualification of judges, (5) Integrity of the US judiciary and financial institutions - or lack thereof... Alternatively - why Alex Kozinski must resign!

What's new:
This message is forwarded to the Honorable John Conyers and members of the Honorable Hank Johnson Subcommittee, as my opinion for the December 10, 2009, hearing at the House Judiciary Committee in re: Recusals and Disqualifications of Judges. Opinion is offered that the true issue beneath failure of judges to disqualify was the presiding of judges in sham court actions, where they consider themselves bound by no law at all! The issue was inseparable from the failure of the US to establish publicly accountable validation/logic verification of large computer systems in the courts, in correctional facilities, in financial institutions, and in public corporations. The corruption of such major systems was reflected in human rights violations of historic proportions in Los Angeles County, California, and also in the Economic/Integrity Crisis, now engulfing the country, where Los Angeles County was recognized as the "epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud".

Background:
1) Atty Richard Fine was abducted at the end of a sham proceeding where he attempted disqualification
Obviously, Atty Richard Fine should be subpoenaed, He was abducted by the Los Angeles Sheriff in open court, with no warrant, on March 4, 2009, at the end of a sham proceeding, where Atty Richard Fine was trying to disqualify Judge David Yaffe. Unbeknown to Richard Fine, such sham sentencing proceeding failed to be listed as part of the litigation record. Richard Fine has been "hospitalized" ever since, with no warrant at all. [1] The true facts in the matter of Richard Fine were covered-up by the Kozinski Fraud - a sham June 30, 2009 Order [2] of the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, unsigned, unauthenticated, which was served on both Atty Richard Fine in jail an on this writer - Joseph H Zernik, as Party in Interest. However, the Kozinski Fraud, in and of itself, was particularly abhorrent, since it was meant to cover up criminalities of much larger scale.

Therefore, my opinion on this matter differs from Richard Fine's, I believe that Richard Fine was wrong both on the facts and on the applicability of the law regarding disqualifications! With all due respect, I am not lawyer, not even by a long shot, while he was a very able attorney - claimed to have cost the California treasury over $1 billions in refunds to taxpayers, or funds that were not permitted to be taxed. However, I managed to disqualify twice Judge Jacqueline Connor - alleged to be the head figure of the LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket).

2) You cannot disqualify a judge who is presiding in sham proceedings in a non-case of the court
In his disqualification efforts, which entirely consumed him before, and after the abduction, Richard Fine failed to comprehend the fundamentals: You could not disqualify a judge, such as David Yaffe - who had never held any due assignment order, and who was presiding in sham proceedings all along - under a sham case caption. It was for such reason that David Yaffe ignored Richard Fine's disqualification efforts. Judge David Yaffe probably also chuckled from time to time, when nobody was watching.

Richard Fine's abduction was falsely attributed to ancillary proceedings on contempt in Marina v LA County (BS109420). Such caption was never a true case of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. It was a major real estate case. Real Parties in Interest were two large, privately held development companies. Defendant was Los Angeles County itself - the payer of the "not permitted" payments to the judges. It would have been entirely unreasonable for Judge David Yaffe to leave such a case under the California Superior Court Track. From the start it was diverted into the Equity/Enterprise Track of the LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). Most attorneys, apparently including Richard Fine, could not distinguish between the two tracks, since access was denied to Registers of Actions, Index of All Cases, Calendars of the Courts, etc.

3) State and US Court records were seriously compromised due to the lack of validation of computer systems
The best proof of what I was just writing above, came from none other than Sharon Stone. In April 2009, media realized that a litigation involving Sharon Stone and her former attorney (who were in this case Defendant and Plaintiff, respectively), failed to ever appear in the sham Index of All Cases offered by the LA Superior Court online. [3] Albeit - the sham online Index came with a disclaimer - that it was not a true Index of All Cases.

4) Celebrity power must be recruited for the corrective actions - US government appeared unable to address the issues.
Nothing in this country would ever move, unless for some celebrity involvement. Therefore, if anybody wanted to generate awareness of the corruption of the judiciary and financial institutions in the US, its scope, and to have every media outlet represented in the hearing, standing room only, all that needed to be done was to have Sharon Stone and her former attorney subpoenaed.

Consequently, maybe Sharon Stone would be even willing to commit to the cause of freeing the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) and Richard Fine. In fact, it is the cause of habeas corpus and the right to access court records - which were connected at the hips.

Hips by Beyonce - habeas corpus and the right to access court records were connected at the hips!

Both of these rights were of late medieval origins, but we, who live in Los Angeles County, California "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud" find ourselves forced to fight for these rights all over again. The effects of the deprivation of such rights were of medieval nature as well - in the false imprisonments of historic proportions - as seen in the cases of the Rampart-FIPs and Richard Fine, and the Integrity/Economic Crisis now engulfing the country.

This message is also forwarded to the agents of Sharon Stone and Beyonce asking if they would be interested in serving as spokespersons for such causes. These two ladies, combined, or each on her own, could make a bigger difference than all others, by lending their smiles to the cause. In fact - the true cause was publicly accountable validation/logic verification of large computer systems in the courts, in correctional facilities, in financial institutions, and in public corporations. But that sounded too technical.

Anyway, whatever Sharon Stone and/or Beyonce would call it, I would just say "Yes, Ma'ams"!
No arguments at all...

Dated December 9, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne,CA 91750
Fax: 801 998 0917
Email:

_________________________________________
I. Linked Records:
[1] Atty Richard Fine: Abduction and forced purported hospitalization of an anti-judicial corruption activist
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2009/12/09-12-08-abusive-medical-practices-by.html
Detailed review of the false records:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Short overview for the attorney reader:
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2009/12/09-12-06-in-defense-of-courts-in-view.html
[2] Sham June 30, 2009 Order by Judge Alex Kozinski, US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-app-ct-9th-fine-v-sheriff-of-la-09-71692-doc-04-order-denying-s.pdf
[3] Actress Sharon Stone: The mystery of missing court records of her litigation at the Los Angeles Superior Court.
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-index-of-all-cases-stone-sharon-april-24-2009-case-sealed.pdf

_______________________________

Copied at the bottom of this message is my recent letter to Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles, on a related matter at the U.S. Court - CM/ECF and NEFs. You can find much more on CM/ECF on my blog, by searching the term "CM/ECF", or use quick reference index at top right of the blog as well.

http://www.blogger.com/
_________________________________________


_________________________________________

_________________________________________

II. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.
• Sharon Stone's agent
• Beyonce's agent

III. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.