10-01-02 Zernik v Connor et al - review of NEFs from papers served on Plaintiff Joseph Zernik by the US District Court, Los Angeles

10-01-02   Re: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550)

Review of NEFs as served on Plaintiff by the US District Court

Table 1: 

Complaint in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) was filed March 6, 2008 against 10 judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, pursuant to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law - 42 USC 1983.  It was further alleged that conduct of such judges and others, in collusion with Countrywide and Bank of America Home Loans amounted to violation of Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) 18 USC 19611968.  Data from papers served on Plaintiff Joseph Zernik by United States Court, Central District of California and their authentication, or lack thereof, was compiled in the table below.  It was alleged that the data shown below reflected large scale fraud in the design and operation of PACER & CM/ECF at the United States Courts.  Not a single one of the papers below was honest, valid, and effectual.

No	Dkt #	Date	Title	NEF [Y/N]	RSA- Digital Sig. [Y/N]
1.	14	3/21/08	Civil Minutes – by Judge Phillips Denying request for TRO, finding that: ·        there was no constitutional right for unbiased judge; ·        Judgment at the Superior Court was “awarded” (but not entered) ·        There was a requirement for exhaustion in 42 USC §1983	N	N/A
2.	27	3/21/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Ordering Plaintiff to serve invalid summons, adulterated by Pro Se Clerk Chris Sawyer.	N	N/A
3.	33	4/18/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle (1st copy) RE: Motions to dismiss	Y	N
4.	33	4/18/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle (2ndcopy) RE: Motions to dismiss	N	N/A
5.	37	4/18/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle (1st copy) RE: Denying Pro Se access to CM/ECF	N	N/A
6.	37	4/18/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle (2ndcopy) RE: Denying Pro Se access to CM/ECF	N	N/A
7.	48	4/24/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Finding request to continue moot	Y	N
8.	57	5/15/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Plaintiff ordered not to file anything in court	N	N/A
9.	63	6/6/09	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of 5/15/08 Minutes is moot.	N	N/A
10.	70	6/20/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Motions to dismiss	Y	N
11.	72	6/30/08	RE: Unsigned Order received from US Court of Appeals – 9th Circuit, that US District Court refusal to issue valid summonses did not amount to a case that justified intervention through the extreme measure of mandamus.	Y	N
12.	77	7/2/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Motions to dismiss	Y	N
13.	80	7/9/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Motions to dismiss	Y	N
14.	81	7/16/08	Notice of Discrepancy – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Plaintiff’s filing of request for judicial notice of Plaintiff’s request for assistance by US Congress – to bring back Los Angeles County into the fold of the US Constitution.	Y	N
15.	84	7/17/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Denying Plaintiff’s request to compel LA Superior Court to allow Plaintiff access to his litigation records in the State Court pursuant to First Amendment rights, so that he may answer the motions to dismiss.	Y	N
16.	86	7/18/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Denying Plaintiff’s request Dkt#85 for honest docketing at the US District Court, and an end to dishonest manipulations of his filings.	Y	N
17.	93	7/31/08	Service of unrelated Civil Minutes from an unrelated case.	Y	N
18.	94	7/31/08	RE: Notice of Clerical Error Signed by Donna Thomas, who to the best of Joseph Zernik’s knowledge was not a Deputy Clek.	Y	N
19.	96	8/4/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Motions to dismiss	Y	N
20.	97	8/5/08	Civil Minutes – by Magistrate Woehrle RE: Denying Plaintiff’s requests for Statements on the record in re: Conflicts if any, pursuant to California Code of Judicial Ethics.	Y	N
21.	102	3/18/09	Order – by Judge Phillips (1st Copy) RE: Denying Plaintiff’s motion to disqualify Magistrate Woehrle for a cause – dishonest manipulations of Plaintiff’s papers filed in court, and eliminating papers from the docket with no record at all, based on no process or procedure, and refusal to file statement in re: conflicts if any.	Y	N
22.	102	3/18/09	Order – by Judge Phillips (2st Copy) RE: Denying Plaintiff’s motion to disqualify Magistrate Woehrle for a cause.	Y	N
23.	103	4/3/09	Report & Recommendation – by Magistrate Woehrle (1st copy) Recommending dismissal with prejudice.	Y	N
24.	104	4/3/09	Report & Recommendation – by Magistrate Woehrle (2nd t copy) Recommending dismissal with prejudice.	Y	N
25.	106	4/24/09	Order – by Judge Phillips RE: Order adopting Report & Recommendation.	Y	N
26.	107	4/24/09	Judgment – by Judge Phillips RE: Dismissal with prejudice.	Y	N

Notes:  

1.       In Zernik v Connor et al, Plaintiff Zernik filed a complaint at the US Court against 10 judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, pursuant to 42 USC §1983 – Deprivation of Civil Rights under the Color of Law.

2.      Furthermore, Plaintiff claimed that conduct of these judges, in collusion with Angelo Mozilo and Sandor Samuels – officers of Countrywide, and later – in collusion with Bank of America Home Loans, amounted to racketeering.

3.      US District Court refused to issue valid summons in this case.

4.      US Court of Appeals, 9^th Circuit refused to order US District Court to issue summons either – albeit – in an unsigned, unauthenticated order.

5.      US District Court – likewise – never issued a single honest, valid and effectual order in this case.  None of the papers served on Plaintiff included an honest valid and effectual NEF.

6.      In Sum: Both US District Court and the US Court of Appeals, 9^th Circuit, covered up alleged racketeering by the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, through the alleged perversion of justice at the US Court – engaging Plaintiff in false and deliberately misleading sham court actions.

7.      Notice:  The conduct of the US Courts in this case is almost an exact copy of the conduct of the US District Court and the US Court of Appeals, 9^th Circuit in the case of the jailed Richard Fine – Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914). However, in Zernik v Connor the US Court colluded with the Superior Court in alleged deprivation of property.  In Fine v Sheriff the US Court colluded with the Superior Court in alleged deprivation of liberty.

8.      In both Zernik v Connor and Fine v Sheriff, dishonest conduct at the US District Court was primarily by Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomas – acting as if she were Deputy Clerk, and Pro Se Clerk – Chris Sawyer. Complaint filed with FBI against the three of them. Claim is that they colluded in both cases with racketeering by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles judges.

9.      Notice: Newspaper reports tied also the former Presiding Judge of the neighboring San Bernardino County to numerous real estate fraud cases. In short – most likely racketeering at the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino is routine as well.  However, in either counties, FBI and US Dept of Justice have not engaged in any enforcement action in the past 25 years, based on published reports of Public Integrity Section of the US Dept of Justice.

10.  Notice: The US District Court then denied Plaintiff access to court records at the US Court. Even to this date, only partial access was gained, on December 29, 2009, to printout of key NEFs, which confirmed that no order and judgment was issued with a valid NEF in this case.

Linked Records:

1. Minutes, orders, and judgment in Zernik v Connor et all, as served on Plaintiff by mail.

2. Request to access court records, and NEFs as received from Records Supervisor Dawn Bullock on December 29, 2009.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24681508/09-12-29-Request-n-Response-Records-Us-Crt-La-s

3. Declaration of Joseph Zernik in re; visit to US District Court, Los Angeles on December 29, 2009 – to access court records to inspect and to copy.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24680732/09-12-29-Declaration-in-re-Gaining-access-to-NEFs-Notices-of-Electgronic-Filings-United-States-District-Court-Los-Angeles-Zernik-v-Connor-et-al

4. Table summary of NEFs received on December 29, 2009.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24681397/10-01-01-Table-Summary-of-Nefs-in-Zernik-v-Connor

II. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.