10-12-31 Natural Born Citizen: Twitter Rules Supreme // Twitter Reglas Supremo // Twitter的规则最高法院

 
Judge James Robertson_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _President Barack Obama
US District Court, Washington DC





Birth certification question hits Buda, Texas


1) Disclaimer:I have taken no sides in the Birthers' court struggles, and no sides in the Don't Ask Don't Tell issue.  In both cases, I only pointed out that the US courts were running pretense litigations with pretense dockets and uncertified judgments on matters of national public policy significance (robbing the citizens through false court actions is old news).

2) To the Point:The latest Birthers' case is before SCOTUS now - Hollister v Soetoro (09-5080)

The issue is the ruling by US Judge James Robertson from the US District Court in Washington DC:

In refusing to hear evidence about whether Obama is eligible, Robertson wrote in his notice dismissing the case, "The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court."

Obviously, constitutional matters are today adjudicated by twittering, not by the US courts, or that is at least the view from the bench...

3) And SCOTUS observer's Prognostication:
The outcome of the matter would be noticed following the January 14, 2010 SCOTUS conference through an unsigned letter from SCOTUS clerk WILLIAM SUTER, or by a signed letter by DANNY BICKEL, signing either as "Staff Attorney", or with no title at all, just as a private citizen. 

Review of the paper court file would reveal no evidence of any order certified by a SCOTUS Justice.

Read more:
New eligibility challenge reaches Supreme Court http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=245753#ixzz19iM7NzaO