Thursday, February 11, 2010

10-02-11 Huminski v. Town of Bennington (2d Cir. November 05, 2004) - and integrity, or lack thereof, in Justice Sotomayor confirmation hearing statement to the US Senate

 

Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:49:53 -0800
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Sotomayor's decisions: Authored? Co-authored? Entered? Unentered?

Hi Scott, Hi All:

As usual, I am just touching the surface of the matters at hand, with no claims of understanding the true legal matters of the decisions.

Huminski cases were listed by Sotomayor in her statement to the US Senate as cases where she authored or co-authored the decisions:
  • 1) Huminski v. Rutland City Police Dept., 221 F.3d 357 (2d Cir. 2000) (per curiam) - p 9
  • 2) Huminski v. Town of Bennington, Vt., 111 Fed. Appx. 643, No. 03-7036., 2004 WL 2490 (2d Cir. November 05, 2004) - p 97
The listing of the latter case is the first evidence that Sotomayor in fact had written or participated in writing the decision. In the order itself, not only the signatures were missing, but also the signature boxes. Therefore, prior to this listing by Sotomayor, one could not even say that Sotomayor authored it, although her name was mentioned at the top of the paper.

Now, since you have her statement to the US Senate that she co-authored such decision, I would say, you should ask her to correct the omission, sign the decision, and take proper ownership of it.  It is as simple as someone mailing you a check with no signature, you mail the check back, and ask the person who issued the check to correct the omission...  I would be curious to hear if Sotomayor would ever respond, and which way. In case she does not respond, one must question the integrity of her statement to the US Senate, where she claimed ownership of such decision.  As my contribution, I am willing to pay the $14.00 for certified, restricted delivery, return receipt, priority mail, if you send her such request, asking for the favor of a response within 10 business days.

It would be of interest, and also of significance I believe, to scan all her decisions as a circuit judge, and get the true number of unsigned decisions as percentage of the total that she claimed. It may be eye opening data.
  • Have you figured out the total number of her decisions as a circuit judge?
  • What is your estimate of average pages per decision?
  • Costs on Pacer?
If the cost is too high, please point out to me the relevant section in the 130 page document listing her decisions, I may just do some random sampling.  There is high likelihood that all such unsigned decisions were in sham cases, which were not entered by the appellate court at all.  One would need to go back to the dockets, and ask for the NEFs to ascertain the true nature of such cases.

Unfortunately, the language of the questions, as stated by the US Senate was not clear enough. It should have stated "decisions that you have written and entered".  Writing alone is of no significance.   Regardless, if we find that substantial portion of the decisions that Sotomayor claimed in her statement to US Senate were unsigned decisions, and if she would refuse to sign yours (which is almost a certainty), and the 2nd Circuit would refuse to allow access to the NEFs (which is by now the established pattern in all US Courts), integrity of the Sotomayor statement to US Senate in her confirmation hearings must be questioned.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!


At 07:45 AM 2/11/2010, you wrote:
So three justice panels handle cases in us appellate courts, based upon sotomayor's 98 page listing of decisions she was invovled in, that's approximately 1000 rulings per year for a generic 3 judge panel.  How can anyone believe that 3 judges can decide (or even understand) this many appellate cases?  It is humanly impossible considering that between briefs and appendices most federal appeals amount to several hundreds of pages.  So it is flocks of clerks, some just out of law school with zero trial or court experience, that decide these federal appeal cases which are highly important to the parties as revealed by their choice to appeal.

It was informative that she listed the unpublished (junk) cases separately from the published (important) cases.

--scott

From: s_huminski@live.com
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
Subject: Sotomayor's decisions
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:12:52 -0500

Sotomayor's decisions for 2005.........

Approx. 280 unpublished opinions for 2005, 29 published opinions =

280 cases she knew nothing about and had nothing to do with +
29 cases where she might have read some facts and participated in some degree in the disposition.

Link to Sotomayor's decisions:

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache%3AIv-1-0Aq7JwJ%3Ai2.cdn.turner.com%2Fcnn%2F2009%2Fimages%2F06%2F04%2Fquestionnaire-appendix-2009.pdf+huminski+v.+bennington+03-7036&hl=en&gl=us

I was at oral argument for 1 of those 280 cases and Sotomayor didn't have a clue concerning the facts or legal claims before her.  -- scott
at No comments:

10-02-11 [English y Castellano] Please join us in filing complaints against those who participated in false hospitalization of Richard Fine / Por favor, únase a nosotros en la presentación de denuncias en contra de quienes participaron en la hospitalización falsa de Richard Fine

    
Dear Friends in the US and abroad:

We hope that you join us in complaints and petitions against those who colluded in abuse of Human Rights of Richard Fine and numerous others, under the color of law, in the large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!

________

Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:47:39 -0800
To: Dianne
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Richard Fine, large-scale false imprisonments, and the corrupt justice system of Los Angeles County, California

Dear Dianne:

Thank you again for your help in such simple acts, which help in establishing documentary evidence of the wrongdoing perpetrated on Richard Fine.  Please notice my most recent complaints. [1] [2] [3] These complaints provided rather good detail of the evidence of fraud by various parties in the Los Angeles justice system relative to the false imprisonment/ hospitalization of Richard Fine, and large-scale false imprisonments of many thousands.  I would be grateful if you concurred by filing your own complaints on such matters.

The parties listed in the complaints included, but were not limited to:
  • a) Judge Davis Yaffe and Clerk John A Clark of the Los Angeles Superior Court - who conducted the "off the record" March 4, 2009 9:00-11:05 am sentencing proceeding in Marina v LA County (BS109420);
  • b) The Sheriff's Warrant Detail - who conducted on March 4, 2009 11:05 am warrantless arrest;
  • c) An Unnamed Sheriff Deputy - who operated March 4, 2009 12:23 pm a falsely registered booking terminal - under the no- longer-existent San Pedro Municipal Court;
  • d) Sheriff's Bureau - which insisted on repeatedly providing false responses October 2009 - January 2010 in response to requests for California Public Records, and refused to produce the California Public Records for the arrest and booking of Richard Fine, and
  • e) John H Clark, MD - Chief Medical Officer of the Sheriff's Bureau - who allowed false hospitalization with no medical justification for almost a year - March 4, 2009 to this date as a cover up for false imprisonment of Richard Fine. 
All these parties were colluding in the false hospitalization of Richard Fine. However, as detailed in the complaints, the evidence showed large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, going back at least a decade to the Rampart -scandal (1998-2000), whose victims - thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) were never set free.

The Complaints linked below were filed with:
  • a) The Sheriff Department;
  • b) The Los Angeles County Ombudsman, and 
  • c) My Supervisor - Michael Antonovich
All three offices were reluctant to accept such complaints, and I had to insist that the complaints be accepted as such (e.g. not concerns, not requests, but Complaints). The Sheriff's Department would not provide any written response absent inquiry by Office of Supervisor Antonovich. Office of the Ombudsman first claimed that it had no authority to review complaints against the Sheriff's Department, and later - that it had no authority to review complaints that had no "Complaint Number" issued by the Sheriff's Department itself. The Office of Supervisor Antonovich was helpful in the past. However, now that we are getting to the crux of the matter, staff in his office suggested that I would be better off suing the Sheriff - as if we, who live in Los Angeles County, California, had access to honest courts.

I would be grateful if you would file such complaints as well.  You may simply copy them and add your cover letters on top, or cut and paste as you deem fit.   Please file such complaints with:
I usually file my complaints by email, with an automatic request for confirmation.  I routinely receive the return confirmation from County agencies. I file my complaints as attachments, which are digitally signed letters, so that no claims could be made that they were not valid.  I therefore listed above only email addresses.  If you know others who may be willing to file such complaints, particularly with the remaining Supervisors, I would be grateful. If nothing else, it simply tells the County agencies that we figured out their fraudulent conduct. Otherwise, I hope that such multiple complaints by different individuals, other than myself, would make it easier for me to file a complaint before an international Human Rights court on this matter. I would be grateful if any persons who filed such complaints copied me on them, so that I may keep count of such complaints.

Likewise, although the petition has no legal effect, I would be grateful for any additional signatures on it. An anonymous option is available:  http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

Obviously, we who live in Los Angeles County, California, under extreme deprivation of Human Rights pursuant to ratified International Law, would be grateful for any others, in the United States or abroad, who would join us in such complaints and petitions.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!
                     Links:
[1] http://inproperinla.com/10-02-10-fine-and-false-imprisonments-complaint-filed-with-office-of-the-ombudsman-s.pdf
[2] http://inproperinla.com/10-02-10-fine-and-false-imprisonments-repeat-complaints-filed-with-office-of-sheriff-s.pdf
[3] http://inproperinla.com/10-02-09-fine-and-false-imprisonments-complaint-filed-with-los-angeles-county-supervisor-re-ombudsman-s.pdf

At 04:55 PM 2/10/2010, Dianne wrote:

jz-

I have sent a copy of Yaroslavsky's letter to the freerichardfine@gmail.com address for their input suggesting Richard himself might want to dictate a response.  I shared your suggestions for a response with them and am awaiting theirs. 

-d

--- On Wed, 2/3/10, joseph zernik wrote:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Response frm Co. Suprvsr. Yarosalvsky re R. Fine
To: "Dianne"
Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 12:02 AM
Dear Dianne:
Thank you for your interest and for sharing with me the January 27, 2010 letter from Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky. 
I am surprised that Mr Yaroslavsky created  such letter replete with false information. You could use my letter linked below, in requesting Mr Yaroslavsky for input regarding false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California.  In response to Mr Yaroslavsky, you may also want to use the response I received from his colleague, Michael Antonovich, where the Sheriff's Department finally admitted that it had no papers for the arrest and booking of Richard Fine, and therefore, were not required by California Public Record Act to produce such papers in response to my requests.
The story propagated in Supervisor Yaroslavsky is false, since it contradicts the data purported by the Sheriff's Department as the legal foundation for the false hospitalization - some unknown court action at the non-existent San Pedro Municipal Court.  Had there been any validity to the story propagated by Supervisor Yaroslavsky, surely the Sheriff's Department would have kept honest, valid, and effectual records to provide the legal foundation for the false hospitalization of Richard Fine. Even after the fallacy of the records provided was repeatedly pointed out to the Sheriff's Department, the Department insisted on producing such false records again in response to inquiry by Supervisor Antonovich.
Please feel free to quote or copy this letter in your response to Supervisor Antonovich.
Truly,
[] 
Joseph Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!
If you don't hear from me, you can always find my latest writing on the blog:
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Or at scribd:
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
Today's writing included the following item, which was related to your email - a request for input by the Sheriff and DA, copied to Supervisor Antonovich, regarding large scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, and the false hospitalization of dissidents like Richard Fine:
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2010/02/10-02-02-requesting-los-angeles.html
Correspondence with Supervisor Antonovich, who inquired on my behalf with the Sheriff Department for the arrest and booking papers of Mr Fine, and response by the Sheriff's Department, that they were not required by California Public Records Act to produced records which did not exist.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25555341/10-01-08-Supervisor-Antonovich-Los-Angeles-County-repeat-mailing-of-January-8-2010-response-from-Sheriff-Lee-Baca-in-re-Richard-Fine-papers-inclu
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24785963/10-01-04-Richard-Fine-Reply-to-Sheriff-Lee-Baca-Re-False-Arrest-Booking-Papers-s
 
At 10:12 PM 2/2/2010, Dianne wrote:
 
Hi JZ,
 
There's been a conspicuous absence of your presence in my email box.  I hope you are OK.
 
I am attaching a copy of a letter received by me frm Co. Suprvsr. Zev Yaroslavsky in response to my inquiry re Richard.  Any comments?  Would you like to help me compose a response? 
 
I was unable to raise the issue at the annual Benedict Canyon Association mtg. @ the Beverly Hills Hotel on 1/25 in person with Yaroslavsky because the BCA would only allow paid members to address Suprvsr. Yaroslavsky and Councilperson Koretz, which I think was discriminatory. 
 
FYI - It has been a month since I filed my request to access JV (Superior) court records re my case and have not received a response.
 
D 
_____
    

Queridos amigos en los EE.UU. y en el extranjero:
Esperamos que se unan a nosotros en las denuncias y peticiones en contra de quienes en connivencia en el abuso de los Derechos Humanos de Richard Fine y muchos otros, bajo la apariencia de legalidad, en la gran escala de falsos encarcelamientos en Los Angeles County, California.
En verdad,

[]



José Zernik, PhD
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Por favor firme nuestra petición - Libre Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Fotos Patriótica de Beyonce Knowles, Sharon Stone, y Charlize Theron,
Pronto la música deep house!

__________________
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:47:39 -0800
A: Dianne
De: Joseph Zernik 

Asunto: Richard Fine, a gran escala encarcelamientos falsos, y el sistema de justicia corrupta del Condado de Los Angeles, California

Estimado Dianne:


Gracias de nuevo por su ayuda en tales actos simples, que ayudan en el establecimiento de pruebas documentales de las irregularidades perpetradas por Richard Fine. Por favor, observe mis quejas más recientes. [1] [2] [3] Estas reclamaciones previsto detalle bastante bueno de las pruebas de fraude por las distintas partes en el sistema de justicia de Los Ángeles en relación con el encarcelamiento falso o de hospitalización de Richard Fine, y en gran escala encarcelamientos falsos de muchos miles. Le agradecería si usted está de acuerdo mediante la presentación de sus propias quejas sobre esas cuestiones. Las partes citadas en las denuncias incluyen, pero no se limitan a:
  1. El juez Yaffe Davis y John A. Clark, secretario de la Corte Superior de Los Ángeles - que llevó a cabo el "off the record" 4 de marzo 2009 9:00-11:05 am sentencia procedimiento en Marina V Condado de Los Ángeles (BS109420);
  2. La obtención de Sheriff del Detalle - que llevó a cabo el 4 de marzo de 2009 11:05 arresto sin orden judicial;
  3. Un Agente de Policía sin nombre - que operaban 4 de marzo 2009 12:23p.m. una terminal de reserva falsamente registrados - en el que ya no existe la Corte Municipal de San Pedro;
  4. Oficina del Sheriff - que insistió en repetidas ocasiones dar respuestas falsas octubre 2009-enero 2010 en respuesta a las solicitudes de Registros Públicos de California, y se negó a producir los Registros Públicos de California para la detención y la reserva de Richard Fine, y
  5. John H. Clark, MD - Oficial Médico en Jefe de la Oficina del Sheriff - que permitieron que la hospitalización falsa sin justificación médica durante casi un año - 4 de marzo de 2009 hasta esta fecha como un encubrimiento por detención ilegal de Richard Fine.
Todos estos partidos fueron cómplices de la hospitalización falsas de Richard Fine. Sin embargo, como se detalla en las denuncias, las pruebas mostraron gran escala encarcelamientos falsos en Condado de Los Angeles, que se remonta por lo menos una década en el escándalo de Rampart (1998-2000), cuyas víctimas - miles de Rampart-FIP (falsamente las personas encarceladas ), nunca fueron puestos en libertad.
Las quejas relacionadas a continuación se presentaron con:

  1. El Departamento del Sheriff;
  2. El Condado de Los Angeles Defensor del Pueblo, y
  3. Mi supervisor - Michael Antonovich
Las tres oficinas se mostraron reacios a aceptar esas quejas, y tuve que insistir en que las quejas se aceptarán como tales (por ejemplo, no se refiere, no peticiones, pero las quejas). El Departamento del Sheriff no aportaría ninguna respuesta por escrito en la investigación de ausencia por la Oficina de Supervisor Antonovich. Oficina del primer Defensor del Pueblo afirmó que no tenía autoridad para examinar las reclamaciones contra el Departamento del Sheriff, y más tarde - que no tenía autoridad para revisar las quejas de que no tenía "Número de queja", emitido por el Departamento del Sheriff en sí. La Oficina del Supervisor Antonovich ha sido útil en el pasado. Sin embargo, ahora que estamos llegando al quid de la cuestión, el personal en su oficina me sugirió que sería mejor que demandar al Sheriff - como si nosotros, que vivimos en el condado de Los Ángeles, California, tenía acceso a los tribunales honestos.
Le agradecería si se presentan denuncias, como así. Usted puede simplemente copiarlos y añadir sus cartas de presentación en la parte superior, o cortar y pegar como lo estimen conveniente. Si el archivo esas denuncias con:

  1. El Departamento del Sheriff: "Sede de la Oficina del Sheriff" ", Alvarado Ana M" ,
  2. El Condado de Los Angeles Defensor del Pueblo: "Stephanie Maxberry"
  3. El Supervisor: 1 º Distrito: Gloria Molina ; 2 º Distrito Mark Ridley-Thomas ; 3er Distrito Zev Yaroslavsky ; 4to Distrito Don Knabe ; 5 de Distrito Michael D. Antonovich .
Por lo general presentar mi queja por correo electrónico, con una solicitud automática de confirmación. Rutinariamente recibir la confirmación de retorno de las agencias del condado.Puedo presentar mis quejas como archivos adjuntos, que son firmados digitalmente las letras, de modo que no podían ser reclamadas que no eran válidas. Por lo tanto, antes mencionados sólo direcciones de correo electrónico. Si conoces a otras personas que pueden estar dispuestos a presentar denuncias, en particular con el resto de supervisores, estaría agradecido. Si nada más, simplemente le dice a las agencias del condado que nos dimos cuenta de su conducta fraudulenta. De lo contrario, espero que las quejas son múltiples por diferentes individuos, que no sea yo, haría más fácil para mí presentar una queja ante un tribunal internacional de Derechos Humanos sobre este asunto. Le agradecería que si alguna persona que haya presentado esas quejas me copió en ellas, para que pueda llevar la cuenta de estas denuncias.
Asimismo, aunque la petición no tiene ningún efecto legal, estaría agradecido por las firmas adicionales en ella. Una opción anónimo disponible: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Obviamente, nosotros que vivimos en el condado de Los Ángeles, California, en virtud de la privación extrema de los Derechos Humanos ratificados de conformidad con el Derecho Internacional, agradecería cualquier otra, en los Estados Unidos o en el extranjero, que se unan a nosotros en esas denuncias y peticiones.

En verdad,
[]






José Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
 http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
 Por favor firme nuestra petición - Libre Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
 Fotos Patriótica de Beyonce Knowles, Sharon Stone, y Charlize Theron,
Pronto la música deep house!

Links
[1] http://inproperinla.com/10-02-10-fine-and-false-imprisonments-complaint-filed-with-office-of-the-ombudsman-s.pdf
[2] http://inproperinla.com/10-02-10-fine-and-false-imprisonments-repeat-complaints-filed-with-office-of-sheriff-s.pdf
[3] http://inproperinla.com/10-02-09-fine-and-false-imprisonments-complaint-filed-with-los-angeles-county-supervisor-re-ombudsman-s.pdf 
at No comments:

Facts-based Discussion: Service Employees Intl Union Local 434b v Fred Snider (BC325828) - Commissioner Murray Gross conducting Debtor Examination proceedings with no Appointment Order...

Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:45:41 -0800
To:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Facts-based Discussion: Service Employees Intl Union Local 434b v Fred Snider (BC325828) - Commissioner Murray Gross conducting Debtor Examination with no Appointment Order...
RE: Facts-based Discussion: Service Employees Intl Union Local 434b v Fred Snider (BC325828) - Commissioner Murray Gross conducting Debtor Examination proceedings with no Appointment Order...
[]_  -messiah-man 
Murray Gross, Commissioner _  _  _ _ _ _  Fred Snider
Los Angeles Superior Court  _ _ _ _ __ _  _ Messiah-Man

Dear All:

Please notice the case below, which included evidence from 2006 in Service Employees Intl Union Local 434b v Fred Snider (BC325828) [1] of Commissioner Murray Gross Presiding with no Appointment Order in "Debtor Examination".  It is the same scam that was attempted by Judge David Yaffe and Commissioner Murray Gross in 2009 in  Marina v LA County (BS109420), and which ended with the false hospitalization of Richard Fine. 

Likewise, conduct of Attorney David Pasternak as "Receiver" with no Appointment Order, and filing of Grant Deeds that were fraudulent on their faces, were key features of multiple real estate fraud instances, which he perpetrated in collusion with judges of the LA Superior Court.

The conduct of cases by judges with no Assignment Orders, and Judicial Officers with no Appointment Orders are among of the highlights of corruption of the Los Angeles Superior Court and its judges.  It is the Equity-Enterprise of the LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) in action.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!

[1] Case Summary in Service Employees Intl Union Local 434b v Fred Snider (BC325828). The Case Summary is a litigation chronology published online by the Superior Court, albeit, with a disclaimer stating its invalidity as a court record. However, since the LA Superior Court denies access to true court records which are the Registers of Actions (California dockets), the public is coerced to rely only on such invalid records in lieu of honest, valid, and effectual dockets.
http://inproperinla.com/10-02-11%20Service%20Employees%20Intl%20Union%20Local%20434b%20v%20Fred%20Snider%20(BC325828)%20-%20Civil%20Case%20Summary.pdf

On Feb 11, 2010 Joseph Zernik wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:11:23 -0800
To: Fred Snider
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Evidence Of Corruption

Dear Mr Snider:

Thanks for bringing to my attention the widespread corruption of the judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court.  Unfortunately, the evidence of widespread corruption of the LA Superior Court judges is overwhelming.  However, FBI refuses to take action.

I am no attorney, not even by a long shot. However, from quick review of the records in your case, on its face, let me point out to you some key part of the corruption in your case, which apparently you never noticed:

In case under caption Service Employees Intl Union Local 434b v Fred Snider (BC325828) the records show that you were subjected to "Debtor Examination" by Commissioner Murray Gross. However, the records included no mention of an Appointment Order, which was required by law for him to conduct such proceedings. 

The conduct of cases by judges with no Assignment Orders, and Judicial Officers with no Appointment Orders were some of the highlights of corruption of the Los Angeles Superior Court and its judges.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!

On Feb 10, 2010 Fred Snider wrote:
X-MSK: CML=1.001000
X-Originating-IP: [198.6.14.250]
From: Fred Snider
To: ,
Subject: Evidence Of Corruption
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:28:16 -0800
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2010 05:28:16.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[037094F0:01CAAADB]
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;

Dear, Sirs &/or Ma'ams:

I possess evidence of L.A. Co. Superior Court judge corruption, & you can review some of it at:

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2007/05/199152.php

Going after them can be extremely dangerous, but I do not fear any person or thing, so I can front the action.

You & your's may be more vulnerable.

Most people may deem my sense of protected power as delusional, but I have evidence to support my observations.

To review that, & more about me, put my e-mail address in the search engines of Yahoo & Google.

http://sites.google.com/site/ultimatetruthrevealed

I realize how crazy it appears, so I offer to take the MMPI-2, a complex mental evaluation.

Let's stop these criminals!

Very Sincerely, Fred Snider

Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.
at No comments: