10-07-18 Fraud On Court by Judge David Yaffe in the Richard Fine Case

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:58:30 +0300
To: ronald gottschalk , "Leslie Dutton"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Fwd: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
Cc: "Fred Sottile" , Mardi

Hi Attorney Gottschalk, Hi Ms Dutton:

Reading the news report below, it appears that Ms Dutton is still missing the point.

Judge David Yaffe was never assigned as presiding judge in Marina v LA County.  Therefore, he never had any intention to review the question, whether or not he should have recused.  Obviously, you cannot recuse when you have never been duly assigned.

In short: Marina v LA County, from the start was pretense litigation.  After all - Los Angeles County was Defendant, and was acting in violation of the law.  There was never any intention to conduct true litigation in the case.

There are numerous signs to support that claim. To name just two:
a) None of the court minutes, orders, writs, judgments in the case were ever authenticated. Therefore, they were all void, not voidable - including, but not limited to the March 4, 2009 "Judgment for Contempt". 
b) Additionally, Judge Yaffe absolutely refused to issue an Appointment Order for Commissioner Gross - because you cannot issue a valid Appointment Order in a pretense litigation.

However, the definitive proof for the claim of pretense litigation in Marina v LA County would found be in the Register of Actions (California civil docket) of Marina v LA County, which the Los Angeles Superior Court denies access to for over a year in violation of First Amendment rights.

Full Disclosure Network would do a great service to Richard Fine and to all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County by pressing for access to the Register of Action in the case.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine


Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.

WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?

*     "Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]

[i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
[ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
[iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

LINKS:April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: ronald gottschalk
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM
Subject: Fwd: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
To:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leslie Dutton-Full Disclosure
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:36 PM
Subject: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
To:

Judge Admits Fraud On Court
In Richard Fine Contempt Case

July 19, 2010

Judge David P. Yaffe:  "Court never intended to find as to whether Mr. Fine had standing to file a verified statement of disqualification" .....

Preview of Full Series 

 Los Angeles, CA  The Full Disclosure Network has learned that Superior Court Judge David Yaffe has admitted that court documents filed in the contempt case of Richard I Fine contained "false information".  According to new documents filed just last week Judge Yaffe has reversed himself  saying that "the Court never intended to find that Richard Fine did not have standing to challenge him from sitting on the case."

ISSUE: SHOULD JUDGE YAFFE HAVE RECUSED HIMSELF?
A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Justice Andrew Kleinfeld issued Fine a Certificate of Appeal ability on the single issue as to whether or not the Trial Court Judge (Yaffe) should have been disqualified. Based on the new documents filed by Yaffe one could speculate that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal and the U. S. District Court might have had a different outcome had they the complete, accurate documentation been before them. 

FALSE STATEMENTS BY THE COURT AT ISSUE
In a letter to the U S Supreme Court Dr. Fine cites two new Minute Orders filed almost two years later that describe how the Federal District Court and the U. S. Supreme Court Courts were misled by Yaffe and his attorney Kevin McCormick.  This admission is found in the  July 13, 2010 Order and another was dated June 18, 2010  but inexplicably filed some twenty-five days later on July 13, 2010 by Clerk of the Court John Clark. It was not until Richard Fine filed a "Fraud Upon The Court" action with the District Court and US Supreme Court the that new documents appeared. 
    
Read Full Report & Details Here

  Real News.....
Real Issues.....Real People.....



Richard Fine Appeals to U S Supreme Court
AGAIN!
Fine's letter to the Supreme Court states: "Judge Yaffe deliberately made false statements in his March 27, 2008Order that referenced and relied upon a March 18, 2008 Order and the July 13, 2010 Order confirms that no such order existed....deliberate false statements of Judge Yaffe were made to fraudulently induce any subsequent court order to rely on...and base its judgment upon such false statements."

• READ FULL DISCLOSURE REPORT HERE
  
  
• Read Fine's Letter To Supreme Court
• Richard I Fine files New Demand for Release with U S Supreme Court
• Court Transcript: Judge Yaffe Admission as witness while sitting as Judge on the case

WHAT IS THE FULL DISCLOSURE NETWORK�?

2010-07-18 Discussion on the OAK Discussion Board // Debate sobre el tablero de la discusión OAK

Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now

Delete CommentDear Lynette: As for the solution - the evidence from Los Angeles County, and beyond, in the past couple of decades shows that we cannot expect it to come from the United States government. The highest level officers of the US Department of Justice are fully informed on corruption of the judiciary in Los Angeles County, California. Yet, they refuse to take action, even when prodded by US Congress. It has therefore been Human Rights Alert's policy for sometime to focus its efforts on increasing international awareness of the level of abuse that US citizens are subjected to by their own government. Hundreds of thousands of reads and downloads from Human Rights Alert were registered from over 85 nations around the globe. Between now and November 2010, our efforts should be focused on lobbying nations who sit on the Human Rights Council of the United Nations - to affect an honest and effectual report by the United Nations in its first ever review of Humane Rights in the United States. [1] We must define specific areas of abuse, such as false imprisonments - the focus of Human Rights Alert's report, the intimidation of Human Rights counsel - the focus of OAK's report, or the retaliation against whistle-blowers - the focus of ITHACA's report. With it, we must propose specific goals and effective corrective actions, which should be easily monitored, which the report would request the United States to undertake between 2010 and the next review - in 2014. It is not that such report is the end all in the matter. However, such report is very likely to get publicity, which is much wider than anything that we may be able to generate on our own. jz LINKS [1] 10-04-24-The-Road-Ahead-from-April-to-the-November-2010-review-of-the-US-Human-Rights-by-the-United-Nations shttp://www.scribd.com/doc/31433805/

Comment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now

Delete CommentDear Dr Jackson: . The case of Richard Fine was used only as an example. The vast majority of the victims are blacks and latinos, and about a third of them were estimated to have been still juveniles at the time of their false imprisonment. . As quoted in the paper forwarded to you some weeks ago: 1) Reports by PBS in 2001 related to the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) provided various estimates of the number of those who were falsely imprisoned in Los Angeles County as 8,000 to 30,000. 2) Unofficial report by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the UC Irvine Law School, and renowned constitutional scholar in 2001 stated upon review of the matter: “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” 3) Unofficial report by Prof David Burcham, Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School in 2001 stated: “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." 4) Official report by the Blue Ribbon Review Panel stated in 2006: "Innocent people remain in prison". It also recommended "external investigation" of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which the US government so far has refused to conduct. , In view of the above, I would be grateful if you could please likewise provide the references to the "general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records." . As far as I could tell, you were making baseless statements by the seat of your pants, in a matter that is, based on solid evidence, a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions. . Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGOhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/ http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/ http://inproperinla.com/ http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/ http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.

Comment by c. lynnette thomas 59 minutes ago

so, with all this blogging and boggling, exposing the issues, where is the chattering about viable solutions? I very much support the idea that comments here should be kept under the 250 word limit rule, as comments and blogs are a might different. anything more that needs said in a comment, a link can be provided to the corresponding blog. that way, we'll be able to sort through all the info with much more ease and, together, devise strategies to begin to resolve the many issues. I would love to aid in that endeavor, but get rather lost in the exhausting comments here. just some thoughts on how to streamline things here and make it more productively functional for all our purposes! :)

Comment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 5 hours ago

I only stated a general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records. I did not imply Richard Fine's papers were in order as I have extreme misgivings concerning his being locked up. Andrew

10-07-18 Government or Private Sector? // Gobierno o del sector privado?