11-01-20 "Burlesque" at SCOTUS // "Burlesque" en la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos // “Burlesque的“在美国最高法院

Court Weighs Whether Corporations Have Personal Privacy RightsAdam Liptak, The New York Times News Service: "A year ago, the court ruled in the Citizens United decision that corporations and unions had a First Amendment right to spend money in candidate elections. But that decision, which involved a question of constitutional law, did not come up at the argument on Wednesday, which considered the quite different issue of what Congress meant when it exempted some files from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. The exemption at issue in the case, Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc., No. 09-1279, protects information that 'could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.'" 
Read the Article 

Accusation: Scalia and Thomas "Participated in Political Strategy Sessions" Before Citizens United Decision
Read the Article at Politico