Sunday, March 27, 2011

11-03-28 Multiple Social Security numbers linked to President Obama - initial signs of Fraud in litigation in the US District, Washington DC // El fraude en el Tribunal de Justicia de EE.UU. en un caso sobre el presidente Obama // 在美国法院诈骗一案有关总统奥巴马

 
Chief Judge Royce Lamberth, US District Court, Washington DC

Taitz v Astrue - pertaining to multiple Social Security numbers linked to President Obama -  initial signs of Fraud in litigation in the US District Court, Washington DC

The case is characterized by the relatively simple underlying facts and law.  The Chief Judge of the US District Court in Washington DC Royce Lamberth may proceed to dismiss the complaint under pretense of judicial review.  However, the practice of pretense litigation undermines any remaining credibility of the US justice system.

Los Angeles, March 28 -  Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, have published commencing  records and reports from litigation of Taitz v Astrue in the US District Court, Washington DC, claiming that the litigation has already been set up for Fraud on the Court -  as pretense litigation. [i,ii]

The complaint in Taitz v Astrue was filed by Dr Orly Taitz against the Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. The complaint pertained to refusal of the Social Security Administration to release information, which was requested as part of efforts to ascertain the validity, or lack thereof, of various Social Security numbers linked to President Barack Obama.

The complaint includes as exhibits two affidavits by licensed Private Investigators:


  • Susan Elizabeth Daniels from Ohio, who located a total of nine (9) Social Security numbers linked to President Obama, and
  • Neil Sankey from California (former Detective Sergeant, New Scotland Yard), who located a total of thirty nine (39) Social Security numbers linked to President Obama.  
While the significance of these findings is at present unclear, Dr Zernik claims that treatment of the case by the US District Court in Washington DC is alarming.

Review of commencing records in the litigation shows that:


  • A civil docket was initiated in the case with invalid Civil Cover Sheet in disregard of the Civil Litigation Management Manual of the Judicial Conference of the United States; [iii]
  • Summons was issued by the Office of the Clerk, but was not docketed, in apparent violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
  • Since the Summons was not docketed, no electronic certificate of authentication/attestation (NEF  Notice of Electronic Filing) [iv,v] could possibly be issued for the Summons, which would therefore render the Summons an invalid court record;
  • Chief Judge of the US District Court, Washington DC Royce Lamberth is listed as Presiding Judge in the case, with no valid Assignment Order.
Combined, the records indicate that from the outset the litigation of Taitz v Astrue has been set up by the Office of Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington and Chief Judge Royce Lamberth as pretense litigation.

Pretense litigation is the practice of the US courts of conducting court cases, where all records are deemed void by the court itself, but are published in the online public access system in a misleading manner as valid court records.  Minutes, orders, and judgment are not entered, or entered with invalid electronic certificate of authentication/attestation by the clerks of the courts.  In other cases, the offices of the clerks of the courts deny access to the electronic certificate of authentication/attestation in alleged violation of First Amendment rights.  Therefore, the US courts leave the public unable to distinguish, whether the court records are valid or void.  

The conduct of pretense litigation has been documented in the US courts from coast to coast, including cases of high public policy significance. [vi,vii] Some of the cases were extensively covered by both US and international media, which failed to report the invalidity of the litigation records. The practice is facilitated by the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts (PACER and CM/ECF). [viii]

The case at hand is characterized by the relatively simple underlying facts and law.  The Chief Judge of the US District Court in Washington DC Royce Lamberth may proceed to dismiss the complaint under pretense of judicial review.  However, the practice of pretense litigation undermines any remaining credibility of the US justice system.

LINKS:
i. 11-02-16 Taitz v Astrue (1:11-cv-00402) in the US District Court, Washington, DC - pertaining to refusal of Social Security Administration to release information regarding President Obama's Social Security data - Dkt #001: Complaint, Exhibits, Cover Sheet, and NEF
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51556092/
ii.  11-03-26 Taitz v Astrue (1:11-cv-00402)  Initial signs of Fraud in litigation in the US District, Washington DC-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51680100/
iii. 10-11-19 Civil Litigation Management Manual, Second Edition (2010) Judicial Conference of the United States, Committee on Court Administration and Case Management
http://www.scribd.com/doc/43498081/ 
iv. 08-02-00 US District Court Central District of California: General Order 08-02, Authorizing CM/ECF, Digital Authentication and Attestation in NEFs
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27632471/
v. 10-04-01 Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing - US District Court, Western District of Texas, Revised April 1, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48329825/
vi. Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Pretense Litigation and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
vii, 11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/ 
viii. 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/

15 comments:

  1. Wow what a scandal, all we wanted to see was his birth certificate but now he is in deep shit.
    Posted 4 hours ago by "bmerdoc" (R) (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Three facts here;

    Fact #1 Obama's social security number was originally given to someone born in 1890 (note they received it around 1935 or so not 1890 that's the year the person was born)

    Fact #2 The first 3 digits 042 are for someone who lived in Connecticut

    Fact #3 Obama never lived in Connecticut
    Posted 4 hours ago by "WE ARE POWER" (R) (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  3. lol

    Time for a revolution Libya style...lol



    .
    Posted 4 hours ago by "God_Himself" (R) (New Zealand)

    ReplyDelete
  4. What did you expect? They spent a lot of money to put this puppet in there, No way are they going to let the Strings be cut.
    Posted 4 hours ago by "Cementhead" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  5. The case at hand is characterized by the relatively simple underlying facts and law.
    Posted 3 hours ago by "RevoInc" (R) (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  6. JZ12345..is the real deal. Seems to dive deep into corruption and mishandling of court procedure in california or california residents(not including Mr.Obama).
    Posted 2 hours ago by "absu69" (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Quoted comment: Three facts here;

    Fact #1 Obama's social security number was originally given to someone born in 1890 (note they received it around 1935 or so not 1890 that's the year the person was born)

    Fact #2 The first 3 digits 042 are for someone who lived in Connecticut

    Fact #3 Obama never lived in Connecticut

    Fact #1: You are a liar
    Fact #2: You are not able to inform/educate yourself properly
    Fact #3: Federal SSN where issued as of november 1936

    Eat shit you facking teabagger !
    Posted 1 hour ago by "BasilHoneycup" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Quoted comment:
    Quoted comment: Three facts here;

    Fact #1 Obama's social security number was originally given to someone born in 1890 (note they received it around 1935 or so not 1890 that's the year the person was born)

    Fact #2 The first 3 digits 042 are for someone who lived in Connecticut

    Fact #3 Obama never lived in Connecticut

    Fact #1: You are a liar
    Fact #2: You are not able to inform/educate yourself properly
    Fact #3: Federal SSN where issued as of november 1936

    Eat shit you facking teabagger !

    You know,I was going to say there is help for your kind with new medicines and such for some of your afflictions,but...There really is no cure for stupid.
    Posted 1 hour ago by "SSstormtr00per" (R) (Canada)

    ReplyDelete
  9. F.O.T.U.S. (Fraud of the etc...)
    Posted 3 hours ago by "2daloo" (R)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think Donald Trump is the only person who will make sure these questions get awnsered.
    Posted 2 hours ago by "Bob_Lablaw" (R) (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Fact #1 - I'm not sure what Obama's SS# is- I've never seen it on a document. I heard there are upwards of 35 attributed to him however...

    Facts #2 - The frist three digits represent the zip code on the envelope that contained the SS card application according to the SS administration - not necessarily the residence of the applicant.

    Fact #3 - Obama's birth father was a resident of CT during the time period that the application for a SS# was made.
    Posted 6 hours ago by "userID1" (R) (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is just MORE PROOF that this current elected official is by far the worst criminal to ever sit in the Oval Office. This is what happens when 55% of Americans voted for an empty suit without knowing a damned thing about the loser. Its clearly apparent that these Americans were duped into believing this dolt could and would "CHANGE" things, but what they didn't know was he wasn't going to do anything but RUIN THIS COUNTRY.

    His past is shrouded in secrecy He has NO life long freinds. He was schooled in the Alinsky method. He is a corrupt Chicago Senator who took bribes and cash from the Chicago criminal scene. Both his fathers abandoned him, his mother was white trash. He was raised by radical grand parents, who gave him a storied white kids life. He is NOT the first Black President of the United States, he is the FIRST Mulatto President, the product of an interracial marriage, race traders.

    He is an illegal alien, and refuses to prove otherwise. He was raised a Muslim, learned the Muslim way. There is NO proof he was born in Hawaii. In fact, its been proven other wise by his family.

    His passport records were breached and the key witness into the investigation was murdered in cold blood sitting in his car one night in DC. No further investigation into the cold blooded murder. What was going to come out in this investigation? What was in those records that murder was needed? Who did this and how high up does this go? Why hasn't anyone investigated this murder any further?

    Now we have this illegal war Obama has started. He is backing Al Qaeda with weapons to put down a Soveriegn countries right to put down a rebellion against them. Just like the United States Government would do if we were to start a rebellion against them. In fact, they have done it numerous times in the past, Civil War, Ruby Ridge, and Waco to name just a few. They would put us down by any means necessary, they have all ready killed women and children without just cause.

    Posted 5 hours ago by "klm123" (R) (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's obviously the end times.
    I think now would be a good time for you to bite down on that cyanide capsule you have been saving or you could always mix it with a little kool-ade...........
    Posted 5 hours ago by "Tongueboy" (R) (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  14. OK, I'll bite. How do you find social security numbers to be "linked" to someone? Banks and former employers just giving out his personal information?
    Posted 16 hours ago by "Intellectual" (R) (USA)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Quoted comment: OK, I'll bite. How do you find social security numbers to be "linked" to someone? Banks and former employers just giving out his personal information?

    On the question, where the Social Security numbers come from, please read the affidavits of the two licensed investigators, linked below. [i]

    Hardly any of the comments address the true subject of the posting - the conduct of the US District Court in Washington DC.
    ____
    LINKS:
    i. 11-02-16 Taitz v Astrue (1:11-cv-00402) in the US District Court, Washington, DC - pertaining to refusal of Social Security Administration to release information regarding President Obama's Social Security data - Dkt #001: Complaint, Exhibits, Cover Sheet, and NEF
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/51556092/
    ___
    Posted 6 hours ago by "jz12345" (R)

    ReplyDelete

All comments are welcome... especially any tips regarding corruption of the courts in Los Angeles. Anonymous tips are fine. One simple way to do it is from internet cafes, etc.