Last New Visitor Slovakia  Visited June 29, 2011 |  |
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
11-06-29 Welcome Slovakia! // Bienvenida a Eslovaquia! // 欢迎斯洛伐克！
11-06-28 Welcome Iraq - Newest Country! // Bienvenido Irak - el país más nuevo! // 欢迎伊拉克 - 最新的国家！
| Newest Country Iraq Last Visited June 28, 2011 |  |
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
11-06-28 Grandma Punished for Helping Florida Prisoners, Locked Up to 5 Years Without a Single Hearing // Abuela Castigado por ayudar a los presos de la Florida, encerró a 5 años sin una sola audiencia// 奶奶处罚帮助佛罗里达州的囚犯，锁定长达5年没有一个单一的听力
Comments:
The story below pertains to the holding of prisoners in Florida with no due process of law. It reflects a much wider abuse of rights through the deprivation of liberty in the United States.
· The United States hold 5% of the world’s population, but 25% of the world’s prisoners’ population. [i]
· Prisons in the United States are often privatized, owned by for-profit corporations.
· Judges in Pennsylvania were recently convicted for racketeering: Taking millions in bribes from prison owners, and falsely imprisoned thousands of juveniles (Kids for Cash scandal). [ii]
· False imprisonment of an estimated 10,000-30,000 people, the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), almost exclusively black and Latinos, has been documented in Los Angeles County, California. They are victims of the largest court corruption in the US history (Rampart scandal 1998-2000). The US government refuses to take actions for their release. [iii]
· Over the past decade, the United States has established a new system of CMUs (Communication Management Units), where prisoners are prevented from communicating with the outside world. [iv]
Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law. [v]
Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
LINKS
[i] 10-06-10 With 5 Percent of the Worlds Population US Holds 25 Percent of Prisoners
[ii] 11-02-18 Pennsylvania Judge Guilty Of Racketeering In Kickback Case (Kids for Cash Scandal)
[iii] 09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review
[iv] 10-06-04 ACLU Objects to Federal Bureau of Prisons "Communication Management Units"-s
[v] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
I have attached and appended below virtually the same motion that Florida grandmother
Nancy Grant encouraged DeSoto County Florida jail prisoners to use to pressure the court
to set them free. For distributing the motion to prisoners who had sat locked up for \
upwards fo 5 years without a single hearing, a couple of lawyers wrote a UPL
(unauthorized practice of law, Florida Statute 454.23) complaint against her. Ultimately,
Chief Judge Richard Haworth of the 12th Circuit Kangaroo Courted Nancy into convictions
on 19 counts of UPL. He graciously sentenced her to $30,500 fine and 15 years'
probation. She couldn't pay the fine, so the state took away her driver license. She lost
her appeal. She gets around on a bicycle these days, tends her herd of 50 cattle on her
small Arcadia ranch, and still smiles a lot. God bless you, Nancy Grant for so selflessly
loving and serving others who suffer.
What should YOU do with this motion?
Well, if I had a friend or loved one who languished in jail without a hearing for longer than 3 months (misdemeanor) or 6 months ( felony), I'd print out the attached document and send it to that person.
If I received such a motion while in jail beyond those times without a hearing, I'd fill it in and ask my jailer to let me file it with the court. Then I'd file it, with the County Clerk, sending copies to the judge, the prosecutor, and the local newspaper editor. I might attach a note explaining the circumstances of my arrest and incarceration.
A person charged with a crime has the right to depose witnesses, review the documents related to the criminal charge for proper oath and affidavit of the accuser, and to obtain a speedy, fair trial. What else does the incarcerated person have to do?
READ THE FULL MOTION PAPERS:
11-06-28 Grandma Punished for Helping Florida Prisoners, Locked Up to 5 Years Without a Single Hearing: http://www.scribd.com/doc/58920067/
--
| Bob Hurt My Blog 2460 Persian Drive #70 Clearwater, FL 33763 Email; Call: (727) 669-5511 Law Studies: Donate Subscribe Learn |
10-06-28 Thanks to Brian Moynihan, Bank of America President // Gracias a Brian Moynihan, presidente de Bank of America // 布赖恩莫伊尼汉，美国总统感谢银行
Thanks to Brian Moynihan for his expedient "Read" confirmation in Re: Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
Dr Zernik of Human Rights Alert (NGO) thankfully received "Read" confirmation from Bank of America President Brian Moynihan, whose conduct in the state and US courts was opined as racketeering in collusion with state and US judges, as well as US Banking regulators.
Effectively, Brian Moynihan and Bank of America today are vested with immunity for both past and future criminality. Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law.
Los Angeles, June 28- Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, have forwarded their thanks (copied below) to Bank of America President Brian Moynihan, for his expedient "Read" confirmation, pertaining to the message detailing his conduct in the state and US courts, opined by Dr Zernik as racketeering (copied below).
It should be noted that such conduct has been going on for some years with full knowledge and collusion by state and US judges, US banking regulators, and US Department of Justice. [i]
The US Congress is aware of the situation as well, but appears powerless to compel US Executive and Judiciary to perform their duties in protecting and upholding the Constitution of the United States. [ii]
Conduct of simulated litigation in cases involving financial institutions was key part of the evidence submitted by Human Rights Alert (NGO) to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations as part of the 2010 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States. Following review, the submission was incorporated into the official UN UPR report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement." [iii]
"Conditions that were created in recent years in the United States amount to effective immunity to Brian Moynihan and Bank of America for both past and future criminality," concludes Dr Zernik, "Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law." [iv]
LINKS
[i] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, Against Brian Moynihan, Bank of America [NYSE:BAC], Bryan Cave LLP, Alleging Racketeering and Large Scale Financial Institution Fraud
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[ii] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
[iii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[iv] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57707808/
Communications with Bank of America President Brian Moynihan in re: Racketeering in the courts.
1) Zernik to Moynihan
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011
To: Joseph Zernik <1stamendmentla@gmail.com>
From: 1st Amendment <1stAmendmentLA@gmail.com>
Subject: Thanks to Brian Moynihan for the expedient "Read" confirmation in Re: Lomas v Bank of America Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
Bcc: [redacted - jz]
Thanks to Brian Moynihan for "Read" confirmation Re: Lomas v Bank of America Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
Dear Mr Moynihan:
Thanks for the expedient "Read" confirmation on the message, referenced above and copied below.
Please rest assured that you are not alone. Thousands of others routinely confirm reading of the press releases:
With it, Human Rights Alert (NGO) performs to its mission - to discover, archive, and disseminate information regarding violations of the Human Rights of the People by the justice system in the United States.
Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law.
Truly,
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 475,060
Followers: 774
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 393,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
2) Moynihan to Zernik
At 01:34 PM 6/28/2011, you wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Moynihan, Brian T
Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:38 AM
Subject: Read: Lomas v Bank of America Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
To: "1stAmendmentLA@gmail.com" <1stAmendmentLA@gmail.com>
Your message was read on Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:38:46 AM UTC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited.
Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may intercept, monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems and may produce any such EC to regulators, law enforcement, in litigation and as required by law.
The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.
References to "Sender" are references to any subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation. Securities and Insurance Products: * Are Not FDIC Insured * Are Not Bank Guaranteed * May Lose Value * Are Not a Bank Deposit * Are Not a Condition to Any Banking Service or Activity * Are Not Insured by Any Federal Government Agency. Attachments that are part of this EC may have additional important disclosures and disclaimers, which you should read. This message is subject to terms available at the following link:
http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Sender you consent to the foregoing.
3) Zernik to Moynihan
______
Lomas v Bank of America Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
Attorney appears in the case, purporting to represent Bank of America. However, both the attorney and Bank of America refuse to state that he has ever been authorized as Attorney of Record for Bank of America in the case. The practice of representation by unauthorized attorneys, with no communications with client clause, should be considered a form of racketeering, routinely conducted by Bank of America in collusion with state and US judges. Looting of the People continues, while the US government refuses to provide protection. The US is in the midst of a constitutional crisis the People are deprived of life, liberty, and property with no due process of law.
Los Angeles, June 27 - In Lomas v Bank of America, Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying to protect her rights against alleged fraud by Bank of America and others in foreclosure procedures in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. However, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), opines that she has been subjected to fraud in the Court itself, through collusion of BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, its President BRIAN MOYNIHAN, California Judge PETER MEEKA, and Clerk of the Court JOHN CLARKE. [[i]] The goal of the fraud in the court is to dispossess Lomas, while denying her due process of law.
Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience in recent years in analyzing fraud in the state and US court records. His opinions on these matters were supported by official report of the UN Human Rights Council, by the opinions of highly-reputed law enforcement and computer science experts, and by peer-review in international computer and criminology journals and conferences. [[ii]]
The Los Angeles Superior Court has engaged Plaintiff Lomas in simulated litigation.
Judge PETER MEEKA and Clerk JOHN CLARKE colluded in subjecting Susan Lomas to a simulated litigation, says Dr Zernik, The goal is to deceive Lomas that she was deprived of property under the rule of law. [[iii]]
Bank of America and Attorney Mark Asdourian are colluding in fraud through the appearance of unauthorized attorney, opines Dr Zernik, The goal is to defraud Lomas, while Bank of America purports no knowledge of the fraud. [[iv]]
In response to Lomas's request to certify his authority as Attorney of Record, Attorney Asdourian provided an unsigned letter, with no mention of a case caption or number, stating: I am not sure I understand what it is you are looking for. [[v]]
The office of Brian Moynihan, Bank of America President, responded after over two months, stating that the Bank was unable to identify the case. Lomas provided the Bank the case caption, number, and court name. Bank of America stated that it needed additional, unspecified information, in order to research the matter. [[vi]]
Brian Moynihan, Bank of America President, is personally responsible for the fraud in the courts.
False appearances of unauthorized attorneys are a routine in cases involving financial institutions in both the state and US courts, says Dr Zernik:
The US government refuses to protect the People against looting by the banks and the courts.
US banking regulators routinely testify before the US Congress that US banking regulation has been shored up, says Dr Zernik, In fact, the US government refuses to protect the People against looting by the banks and the courts. [[x]] Millions have been dispossessed already, and additional millions will be dispossessed in the next few years, according to experts projections.
Dr Zernik has uncovered and reported to FBI and the US Attorneys office a series of cases of simulated litigation in the Los Angeles Superior Court in real estate matters, going back almost two decades. [[xi]] His report on the matter was also reviewed by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations. In response, a 2010 official UN report concluded corruption of the courts and the legal profession. [[xii]] Top US legal scholars repeatedly issued similar opinions of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [[xiii]]
The Los Angeles Superior Court should be considered a racket. Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern, says Dr Zernik. [[xiv],[xv],[xvi]]
Of note, Judge MEEKA refuses to provide Plaintiff Lomas a statement on the record regarding financial benefits to him, if any, by Bank of America.
The US is in the midst of a constitutional crisis, the like of which has not been seen since the Civil War.
Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War, says Dr Zernik, The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law. [[xvii]]
LINK
[i] [1] 11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51160102/
[2] 11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online Case Summary and Minutes
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/
[3] 11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Fraud on the Court in a Quiet Title Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52336989/
[4] 11-04-08 US Attorney Office and FBI Complaint against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk John Clarke, BofA and its President Brian Moynihan - Public Corruption and Racketeering in Lomas V Bank of America (KC059379)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52601871/
[5] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/
[6] 11-04-15 Press Release: Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) - Lomas files for disqualification of Judge Meeka, calls quits to charades in the Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53071727/
[ii] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[iv] [1] 11-04-12 Lomas v BofA (KC059379) Brian Moynihan and General Counsel of BofA are asked to disclose Attorney of Record
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52914197/
[2] 11-04-13 PRESS RELEASE: Lomas v BofA - BofA, Brian Moynihan Are Asked to Name Their Attorney of Record in the Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52921960/
[3] 11-03-31 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Request and Response for Certification of Authority as Attorney of Record
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52516705/
[v] 11-03-31 RE: Lomas v Bank of America (KCD59379) in the Los Angeles Superior Court - Requests and Responses in re: Authorization of Attorney Mark Asdourian to appear as Counsel of Record- (4 records)s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58835347/
[vi] See [v], above.
[vii] 8-03-05 Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25001966/
[viii] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[ix] [1] 11-04-08 PRESS RELEASE: Complaint filed against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, Bank of America and its President Brian Moynihan, and Attorney Mark Asdourian for Public Corruption and Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52602364/
[2] 11-04-08 US Attorney Office and FBI Complaint against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk John Clarke, BofA and its President Brian Moynihan - Public Corruption and Racketeering in Lomas V Bank of America (KC059379)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52601871/
[x] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
[xi] [1] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/
[2] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/
[xii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[xiii] See opinions of the Los Angeles Superior Court below.
[xiv] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/
[xv] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/
[xvi] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/
[xvii] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57707808/
____
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 475,060
Followers: 774
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 393,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue
CNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006 That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013
Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
_____
Dr Zernik of Human Rights Alert (NGO) thankfully received "Read" confirmation from Bank of America President Brian Moynihan, whose conduct in the state and US courts was opined as racketeering in collusion with state and US judges, as well as US Banking regulators.
Effectively, Brian Moynihan and Bank of America today are vested with immunity for both past and future criminality. Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law.
Los Angeles, June 28- Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, have forwarded their thanks (copied below) to Bank of America President Brian Moynihan, for his expedient "Read" confirmation, pertaining to the message detailing his conduct in the state and US courts, opined by Dr Zernik as racketeering (copied below).
It should be noted that such conduct has been going on for some years with full knowledge and collusion by state and US judges, US banking regulators, and US Department of Justice. [i]
The US Congress is aware of the situation as well, but appears powerless to compel US Executive and Judiciary to perform their duties in protecting and upholding the Constitution of the United States. [ii]
Conduct of simulated litigation in cases involving financial institutions was key part of the evidence submitted by Human Rights Alert (NGO) to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations as part of the 2010 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States. Following review, the submission was incorporated into the official UN UPR report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement." [iii]
"Conditions that were created in recent years in the United States amount to effective immunity to Brian Moynihan and Bank of America for both past and future criminality," concludes Dr Zernik, "Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law." [iv]
LINKS
[i] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, Against Brian Moynihan, Bank of America [NYSE:BAC], Bryan Cave LLP, Alleging Racketeering and Large Scale Financial Institution Fraud
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[ii] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
[iii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[iv] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57707808/
Communications with Bank of America President Brian Moynihan in re: Racketeering in the courts.
1) Zernik to Moynihan
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011
To: Joseph Zernik <1stamendmentla@gmail.com>
From: 1st Amendment <1stAmendmentLA@gmail.com>
Subject: Thanks to Brian Moynihan for the expedient "Read" confirmation in Re: Lomas v Bank of America Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
Bcc: [redacted - jz]
Thanks to Brian Moynihan for "Read" confirmation Re: Lomas v Bank of America Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
Dear Mr Moynihan:
Thanks for the expedient "Read" confirmation on the message, referenced above and copied below.
Please rest assured that you are not alone. Thousands of others routinely confirm reading of the press releases:
- Law professors in top law schools worldwide
- Law professors in top US law schools
- Civil rights organizations and activists
- Misc US attorneys
- US and world media
- US Congress
- International banking regulators
- US banking regulators
With it, Human Rights Alert (NGO) performs to its mission - to discover, archive, and disseminate information regarding violations of the Human Rights of the People by the justice system in the United States.
Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law.
Truly,
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 475,060
Followers: 774
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 393,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
2) Moynihan to Zernik
At 01:34 PM 6/28/2011, you wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Moynihan, Brian T
Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:38 AM
Subject: Read: Lomas v Bank of America Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
To: "1stAmendmentLA@gmail.com" <1stAmendmentLA@gmail.com>
Your message was read on Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:38:46 AM UTC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and attachments, and be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached to this message is prohibited.
Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Sender. Subject to applicable law, Sender may intercept, monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems and may produce any such EC to regulators, law enforcement, in litigation and as required by law.
The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.
References to "Sender" are references to any subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation. Securities and Insurance Products: * Are Not FDIC Insured * Are Not Bank Guaranteed * May Lose Value * Are Not a Bank Deposit * Are Not a Condition to Any Banking Service or Activity * Are Not Insured by Any Federal Government Agency. Attachments that are part of this EC may have additional important disclosures and disclaimers, which you should read. This message is subject to terms available at the following link:
http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. By messaging with Sender you consent to the foregoing.
3) Zernik to Moynihan
______
Lomas v Bank of America Bank of America and Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts
Attorney appears in the case, purporting to represent Bank of America. However, both the attorney and Bank of America refuse to state that he has ever been authorized as Attorney of Record for Bank of America in the case. The practice of representation by unauthorized attorneys, with no communications with client clause, should be considered a form of racketeering, routinely conducted by Bank of America in collusion with state and US judges. Looting of the People continues, while the US government refuses to provide protection. The US is in the midst of a constitutional crisis the People are deprived of life, liberty, and property with no due process of law.
Los Angeles, June 27 - In Lomas v Bank of America, Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying to protect her rights against alleged fraud by Bank of America and others in foreclosure procedures in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. However, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), opines that she has been subjected to fraud in the Court itself, through collusion of BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, its President BRIAN MOYNIHAN, California Judge PETER MEEKA, and Clerk of the Court JOHN CLARKE. [[i]] The goal of the fraud in the court is to dispossess Lomas, while denying her due process of law.
Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience in recent years in analyzing fraud in the state and US court records. His opinions on these matters were supported by official report of the UN Human Rights Council, by the opinions of highly-reputed law enforcement and computer science experts, and by peer-review in international computer and criminology journals and conferences. [[ii]]
The Los Angeles Superior Court has engaged Plaintiff Lomas in simulated litigation.
Judge PETER MEEKA and Clerk JOHN CLARKE colluded in subjecting Susan Lomas to a simulated litigation, says Dr Zernik, The goal is to deceive Lomas that she was deprived of property under the rule of law. [[iii]]
- The minutes in the case were not certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
- The minutes were not noticed and served by the Court;
- Multiple proceedings were secretly listed by Judge MEEKA in the minutes as "off of the record";
- Judge MEEKA and Clerk CLARKE continue to deny Lomas access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in her own case.
Bank of America and Attorney Mark Asdourian are colluding in fraud through the appearance of unauthorized attorney, opines Dr Zernik, The goal is to defraud Lomas, while Bank of America purports no knowledge of the fraud. [[iv]]
- Attorney Asdourian appears in the case, and has filed false and deliberately misleading banking records and declarations, and
- No declaration or any other record signed by a person, authorized by Bank of America, has ever been filed in the case.
- Both Bank of America and Asdourian refuse to certify that Asdourian was and is authorized to appear on behalf of Bank of America in the case.
In response to Lomas's request to certify his authority as Attorney of Record, Attorney Asdourian provided an unsigned letter, with no mention of a case caption or number, stating: I am not sure I understand what it is you are looking for. [[v]]
The office of Brian Moynihan, Bank of America President, responded after over two months, stating that the Bank was unable to identify the case. Lomas provided the Bank the case caption, number, and court name. Bank of America stated that it needed additional, unspecified information, in order to research the matter. [[vi]]
Brian Moynihan, Bank of America President, is personally responsible for the fraud in the courts.
False appearances of unauthorized attorneys are a routine in cases involving financial institutions in both the state and US courts, says Dr Zernik:
- The fraudulent practice of appearances by unauthorized attorneys, with no communications with client clause, was widespread in Countrywide (now a subsidiary of Bank of America). It was described and rebuked by the Honorable Jeff Bohm, US Bankruptcy Judge, in a March 2008 Memorandum Opinion. Countrywide's executives promised Judge Bohm to cease that conduct. [[vii]]
- The practice was eventually brought to a halt only after the July 1, 2008 takeover of Countrywide by Bank of America. At that time Timothy Mayopoulos was General Counsel of Bank of America.
- On December 10, 2008, Mr Mayopoulos was ousted, and Brian Moynihan was appointed as his replacement. Within 24 hours, the practice was resumed in full force. [[viii]]
- I consider the whole affair of Lomas v Bank of America criminal in nature," says Dr Zernik.
The US government refuses to protect the People against looting by the banks and the courts.
US banking regulators routinely testify before the US Congress that US banking regulation has been shored up, says Dr Zernik, In fact, the US government refuses to protect the People against looting by the banks and the courts. [[x]] Millions have been dispossessed already, and additional millions will be dispossessed in the next few years, according to experts projections.
Dr Zernik has uncovered and reported to FBI and the US Attorneys office a series of cases of simulated litigation in the Los Angeles Superior Court in real estate matters, going back almost two decades. [[xi]] His report on the matter was also reviewed by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations. In response, a 2010 official UN report concluded corruption of the courts and the legal profession. [[xii]] Top US legal scholars repeatedly issued similar opinions of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [[xiii]]
The Los Angeles Superior Court should be considered a racket. Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern, says Dr Zernik. [[xiv],[xv],[xvi]]
Of note, Judge MEEKA refuses to provide Plaintiff Lomas a statement on the record regarding financial benefits to him, if any, by Bank of America.
The US is in the midst of a constitutional crisis, the like of which has not been seen since the Civil War.
Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War, says Dr Zernik, The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law. [[xvii]]
LINK
[i] [1] 11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51160102/
[2] 11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online Case Summary and Minutes
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/
[3] 11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Fraud on the Court in a Quiet Title Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52336989/
[4] 11-04-08 US Attorney Office and FBI Complaint against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk John Clarke, BofA and its President Brian Moynihan - Public Corruption and Racketeering in Lomas V Bank of America (KC059379)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52601871/
[5] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/
[6] 11-04-15 Press Release: Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) - Lomas files for disqualification of Judge Meeka, calls quits to charades in the Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53071727/
[ii] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[iv] [1] 11-04-12 Lomas v BofA (KC059379) Brian Moynihan and General Counsel of BofA are asked to disclose Attorney of Record
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52914197/
[2] 11-04-13 PRESS RELEASE: Lomas v BofA - BofA, Brian Moynihan Are Asked to Name Their Attorney of Record in the Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52921960/
[3] 11-03-31 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Request and Response for Certification of Authority as Attorney of Record
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52516705/
[v] 11-03-31 RE: Lomas v Bank of America (KCD59379) in the Los Angeles Superior Court - Requests and Responses in re: Authorization of Attorney Mark Asdourian to appear as Counsel of Record- (4 records)s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58835347/
[vi] See [v], above.
[vii] 8-03-05 Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25001966/
[viii] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[ix] [1] 11-04-08 PRESS RELEASE: Complaint filed against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, Bank of America and its President Brian Moynihan, and Attorney Mark Asdourian for Public Corruption and Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52602364/
[2] 11-04-08 US Attorney Office and FBI Complaint against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk John Clarke, BofA and its President Brian Moynihan - Public Corruption and Racketeering in Lomas V Bank of America (KC059379)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52601871/
[x] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
[xi] [1] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/
[2] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/
[xii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[xiii] See opinions of the Los Angeles Superior Court below.
[xiv] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/
[xv] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/
[xvi] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/
[xvii] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57707808/
____
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 475,060
Followers: 774
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 393,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue
CNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006 That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013
Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
_____
11-06-27 Homeless get 15 years for stealing $100, banker gets 3.5 years for stealing $3 billions! // Personas sin hogar recibe 15 años por el robo de $ 100, el banquero obtiene 3,5 años por el robo de $ 3 mil millones! // 无家可归者得到偷百美元15年，银行家获取偷3美元亿元3.5年！
Homeless man gets 15 years for stealing $100
A homeless man robbed a Louisiana bank and took a $100 bill. After feeling remorseful, he surrendered to police the next day. The judge sentenced him to 15 years in prison.
Roy Brown, 54, robbed the Capital One bank in Shreveport, Louisiana in December 2007. He approached the teller with one of his hands under his jacket and told her that it was a robbery.
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/265402#ixzz1QZKSGdbC
Ex-Taylor, Bean CEO Paul Allen Sentenced to 40 Months in Prison for Fraud
By Tom Schoenberg - Jun 22, 2011 7:01 AM GMT+0300
Former Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. chief executive officer Paul Allen sentenced to about 3 1/2 years in prison in federal court in Virginia for his role in a $3 billion fraud scheme.
Allen, 55, yesterday became the sixth person sent to prison by U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema for participating in a fraud that duped some of the largest U.S. financial institutions. The scheme also targeted the federal bank bailout program and contributed to the failure of Montgomery, Alabama- based Colonial Bank and its parent, Colonial BancGroup Inc.
Read more:
11-06-27 Bank of America and Its President Brian Moynihan Continue Racketeering in the Courts // Bank of America y su presidente, Brian Moynihan Continuar extorsión en los Tribunales // 美国和它的总裁Brian莫伊尼汉银行继续在法院敲诈勒索
In Lomas v Bank of American in the Los Angeles Superior Court: Attorney appears in the case, purporting to represent Bank of America. However, both the attorney and Bank of America refuse to state that he has ever been authorized as Attorney of Record for Bank of America in the case. The practice of representation by unauthorized attorneys, with “no communications with client” clause, should be considered a form of racketeering, routinely conducted by Bank of America in collusion with state and US judges. Looting of the People continues, while the US government refuses to provide protection. The US is in the midst of a constitutional crisis – the People are deprived of life, liberty, and property with no due process of law.
Los Angeles, June 27 - In Lomas v Bank of America, Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying to protect her rights against alleged fraud by Bank of America and others in foreclosure procedures in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. However, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), opines that she has been subjected to fraud in the Court itself, through collusion of BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, its President BRIAN MOYNIHAN, California Judge PETER MEEKA, and Clerk of the Court JOHN CLARKE. [[i]] The goal of the fraud in the court is to dispossess Lomas, while denying her due process of law.
Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience in recent years in analyzing fraud in the state and US court records. His opinions on these matters were supported by official report of the UN Human Rights Council, by the opinions of highly-reputed law enforcement and computer science experts, and by peer-review in international computer and criminology journals and conferences. [[ii]]
The Los Angeles Superior Court has engaged Plaintiff Lomas in simulated litigation.
“Judge PETER MEEKA and Clerk JOHN CLARKE colluded in subjecting Susan Lomas to a simulated litigation,” says Dr Zernik, “The goal is to deceive Lomas that she was deprived of property under the rule of law.” [[iii]]
· The minutes in the case were not certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
· The minutes were not noticed and served by the Court;
· Multiple proceedings were secretly listed by Judge MEEKA in the minutes as "off of the record";
· Judge MEEKA and Clerk CLARKE continue to deny Lomas access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in her own case.
Bank of America and its Attorney engage in Fraud on the Court.
“Bank of America and Attorney Mark Asdourian are colluding in fraud through the appearance of unauthorized attorney,” opines Dr Zernik, “The goal is to defraud Lomas, while Bank of America purports no knowledge of the fraud.” [[iv]]
- Attorney Asdourian appears in the case, and has filed false and deliberately misleading banking records and declarations, and
- No declaration or any other record signed by a person, authorized by Bank of America, has ever been filed in the case.
- Both Bank of America and Asdourian refuse to certify that Asdourian was and is authorized to appear on behalf of Bank of America in the case.
In response to Lomas’s requests that Bank of America and Asdourian certify his authority, the Bank and its attorney engage in obstruction.
In response to Lomas’s request to certify his authority as Attorney of Record, Attorney Asdourian provided an unsigned letter, with no mention of a case caption or number, stating: “I am not sure I understand what it is you are looking for.” [[v]]
Figure 1: Excerpt from the April 6, 2011 response by Attorney Asdourian on Lomas’s request that he state his authority to appear as Attorney of Record on behalf of Bank of America in her case.
The office of Brian Moynihan, Bank of America President, responded after over two months, stating that the Bank was unable to identify the case. Lomas provided the Bank the case caption, number, and court name. Bank of America stated that it needed additional, unspecified information, in order to “research the matter.” [[vi]]
Brian Moynihan, Bank of America President, is personally responsible for the fraud in the courts.
“False appearances of unauthorized attorneys are a routine in cases involving financial institutions in both the state and US courts,” says Dr Zernik:
· The fraudulent practice of appearances by unauthorized attorneys, with “no communications with client” clause, was widespread in Countrywide (now a subsidiary of Bank of America). It was described and rebuked by the Honorable Jeff Bohm, US Bankruptcy Judge, in a March 2008 Memorandum Opinion. Countrywide’s executives promised Judge Bohm to cease that conduct. [[vii]]
· The practice was eventually brought to a halt only after the July 1, 2008 takeover of Countrywide by Bank of America. At that time Timothy Mayopoulos was General Counsel of Bank of America.
· On December 10, 2008, Mr Mayopoulos was ousted, and Brian Moynihan was appointed as his replacement. Within 24 hours, the practice was resumed in full force. [[viii]]
“I consider the whole affair of Lomas v Bank of America criminal in nature,” says Dr Zernik. Accordingly, Dr Zernik has filed with FBI and the US Attorney Office a criminal complaint, alleging Public Corruption and Racketeering against Judge PETER MEEKA, Clerk JOHN CLARKE, BRIAN MOYNIHAN, Bank of America, and others. [[ix]]
The US government refuses to protect the People against looting by the banks and the courts.
“US banking regulators routinely testify before the US Congress that US banking regulation has been ‘shored up’,” says Dr Zernik, “In fact, the US government refuses to protect the People against looting by the banks and the courts.” [[x]] Millions have been dispossessed already, and additional millions will be dispossessed in the next few years, according to experts projections.
Dr Zernik has uncovered and reported to FBI and the US Attorney’s office a series of cases of simulated litigation in the Los Angeles Superior Court in real estate matters, going back almost two decades. [[xi]] His report on the matter was also reviewed by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations. In response, a 2010 official UN report concluded “corruption of the courts and the legal profession”. [[xii]] Top US legal scholars repeatedly issued similar opinions of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [[xiii]]
“The Los Angeles Superior Court should be considered a racket. Bribing of state and US judges by Bank of America must be a serious concern,” says Dr Zernik. [[xiv],[xv],[xvi]]
Of note, Judge MEEKA refuses to provide Plaintiff Lomas a statement on the record regarding financial benefits to him, if any, by Bank of America.
The US is in the midst of a constitutional crisis, the like of which has not been seen since the Civil War.
“Corruption of the courts has reached a level of a constitutional crisis, not seen since the Civil War,” says Dr Zernik, “The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property, with no due process of law.” [[xvii]]
LINK
[i] [1] 11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court
[2] 11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online “Case Summary” and Minutes
[3] 11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – Fraud on the Court in a Quiet Title Action
[4] 11-04-08 US Attorney Office and FBI Complaint against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk John Clarke, BofA and its President Brian Moynihan - Public Corruption and Racketeering in Lomas V Bank of America (KC059379)
[5] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
[6] 11-04-15 Press Release: Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) - Lomas files for disqualification of Judge Meeka, calls “quits” to charades in the Los Angeles Superior Court
[iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[iv] [1] 11-04-12 Lomas v BofA (KC059379) Brian Moynihan and General Counsel of BofA are asked to disclose Attorney of Record
[2] 11-04-13 PRESS RELEASE: Lomas v BofA - BofA, Brian Moynihan Are Asked to Name Their Attorney of Record in the Los Angeles Superior Court
[3] 11-03-31 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Request and Response for Certification of Authority as Attorney of Record
[v] 11-03-31 RE: Lomas v Bank of America (KCD59379) in the Los Angeles Superior Court - Requests and Responses in re: Authorization of Attorney Mark Asdourian to appear as Counsel of Record- (4 records)s
[vii] 8-03-05 Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:
[viii] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
[ix] [1] 11-04-08 PRESS RELEASE: Complaint filed against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, Bank of America and its President Brian Moynihan, and Attorney Mark Asdourian – for Public Corruption and Racketeering
[2] 11-04-08 US Attorney Office and FBI Complaint against California Judge Peter Meeka, Clerk John Clarke, BofA and its President Brian Moynihan - Public Corruption and Racketeering in Lomas V Bank of America (KC059379)
[x] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
[2] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action
[xii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
[xiii] See opinions of the Los Angeles Superior Court below.
[xiv] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
[xv] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action
[xvii] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
____
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 475,060
Followers: 774
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 393,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue
CNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006 That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013
Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
_____
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 475,060
Followers: 774
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 393,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue
CNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006 That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013
Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
_____