11-02-10 Fraud in the US Supreme Court // Fraude en los EE.UU. Corte Suprema de Justicia // 欺诈在美国最高法院

 

Clerk William Suter, US Supreme Court

Fraud opined in US Supreme Court records received by Petitioner William Windsor from the office of Clerk Suter

Were the petition and application of William Windsor reviewed by the US Supreme Court?  There is no way to tell...  No valid judicial records have been discovered so far... and in the most recent response from the office of Clerk Suter false and deliberately misleading records have been produced by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Los Angeles, February 10 -  Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has recently filed a request with the US Congress for impeachment of Clerk Suter of the US Supreme Court, for Deprivation of Rights:

• Denying petitioners and applicants the Due Process right of notice and service of orders of the Court, and
• Denying the People access to the judicial records of the court. [[i]]

Human Rights Alert further noted, that the US Supreme Court, where valid judicial records in numerous cases are nowhere to be found, today fails to meet fundamental standards of an honest tribunal. [[ii]]

Now, additional records, received by petitioner William Windsor from the office of Clerk Suter, led to the posting of opinion of fraud by the office of Clerk Suter of the US Supreme Court. [[iii]]

Mr Windsor has been trying for sometime to discover, whether petitions and applications, which he filed with the US Supreme Court in effort to protect his rights, were at all reviewed by the Court:

• The online dockets of the Supreme Court of the United States note denial of Windsor's petition and application on January 18, 2011.  However, Windsor has not been duly served by Clerk Suter with the order of denial.
• Consequently, Windsor has unsuccessfully attempted to discover valid judicial records of the presumed January 18, 2011, review and denial of his petition and application. [[iv]]
• On January 18-21, 2011, Mr George McDermott of Maryland, unrelated to the case, attempted to access the paper and electronic files and judicial records of the US Supreme Court, pertaining to Mr Windsor and others.  The office of Clerk Suter denied access to the records. [[v]]
• Later, as further effort to discover whether his case was at all reviewed by the Supreme Court, Windsor filed a Motion for an Order by the Court on Clerk William S Suter for Service of Valid Evidence of Denial.  On February 8, 2011, the Motion was stamped "Received" by the office of the Clerk of the US Supreme Court.

Now, Windsor received a response from the office of Clerk Suter on his February 8, 2011 Motion:

• A February 8, 2011 letter was issued on behalf of Clerk William Suter, signed by Ms Cynthia Rapp, with no notation of her authority.
• The enclosure to the February 8, 2011 Ms Rapp letter includes a copy of a record, which is an unsigned January 18, 2011 Order, denying Windsor's Petition (10-690). Unsigned judicial records are invalid ones.
• The copy of the January 18, 2011 unsigned Order was further stamped "True Copy", but the signature on the "True Copy" stamp was an invalid signature as well.  

Based on such records, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert, has issued a statement:

In the February 8, 2011 letter, invalid records are provided to Mr William Windsor on behalf of Clerk William Suter of the US Supreme Court. Moreover, the February 8, 2010 letter, signed by Ms Cynthia Rapp, demonstrates ongoing efforts to mislead Mr Windsor that he has been served with valid records pertaining to the denial of his petition and application (10-690 and 10-A690) by the Supreme Court of the United States.

In addition, Dr Zernik, PhD, has opined that conduct of the office of Clerk William Suter in this case amounts to Fraud.

Dr Zernik has accumulated substantial experience in examining records of the US and state courts, of US prisons, as well as US banking records.  His opinions regarding such records were often supported by leading experts in related fields. [[vi]]  His reviews regarding computerized court and prison records in the United States were published in international, peer-reviewed computer science journal. [[vii], [viii]]  Report authored by Dr Zernik on behalf of Human Rights Alert (NGO), was incorporated into official United Nations report with reference to "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California. [[ix]]

LINKS

[i] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
[ii] 11-02-08 Where Are the Missing Records of the Supreme Court of the United States?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48414184/
[iii] 11-02-10 Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation (10-690 and 10-A690) - Fraud opined in US Supreme Court records, received by Mr Windsor from office of Clerk Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48596120/
[iv] 11-01-28 Press Release: Windsor v Maid of the Mist (10-A690) in the US Supreme Court - Alleged "Shell Game Fraud"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47778291/
[v] 11-01-22 Declaration of George McDermott in re: Attempt to Access US Supreme Court Paper and Electronic Records to Inspect and to Copy
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47455844/
[vi] 11-01-06 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[vii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty - Online Public Prisoners' Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
[viii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[ix] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

11-02-10 Deliberately Misleading Testimony of Acting Inspector General Cynthia Schnedar, US Department of Justice, before the US House Committee on Appropriations // Falso testimonio de EE.UU. Departamento de Justicia al Congreso de los EE.UU. // 虚假证词美国司法部向美国国会

 Given the abundance of official, expert, and media reports of large-scale false imprisonments, widespread corruption of the courts, and unprecedented fraudulent dispossession of homeowners throughout the United States, the testimony by the Acting Inspector General must be deemed false and deliberately misleading.

Los Angeles, February 10 - on February 9, 2010 Acting Inspector General Cynthia Schendar, US Department of Justice, provided a statement before the US House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations, concerning oversight of the department of justice. [[i]] Upon review of the statement and the true facts in the matter, the statement must be deemed false and deliberately misleading.

The statement lists "challenges" of the US Department of Justice, similar to those that have been listed in previous years, including:

• Restoring Confidence in the Department of Justice
• Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
• Violent and Organized Crime
• Financial Crimes and Cyber Crimes

The statement, as delivered, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that the US Department of Justice, in general, and the Office of Inspector General, in particular, are honestly addressing such "challenges".

The true facts in these matters indicate the opposite:

• In February 2009 Senator Patrick Leahy, Chair of the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary [[ii]] publicly called for the establishment of a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.  Such commissions have been established by other nations upon emergence from various types of tyrannies.
• In July 2010 Prof Laurence Tribe, in his capacity as Senior Counsel, Access to Justice Initiative, called upon the Chief Justices of the several states to stop deterioration of the state courts in the US, to a level comparable to that of third world nations. [[iii]]
• In summer 2010 the United Nations Human Rights Council issued an official report referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California". [[iv]] The report was based on official, expert, and media reports of large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County California, and conduct, which should be deemed as racketeering, by the Judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court in collusion with financial institutions and large law firms in real estate matters.  The evidence included Inquiries by US Congress  -  Senator Dianne Feinstein and Congresswoman Diane Watson - on the US Department of Justice, relative to their refusal to investigate evidence of racketeering by judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. The evidence also included consequent Inquiry by Senator Diane Feinstein on then US DOJ Inspector General Glenn Fine, regarding alleged fraud in responses by FBI Assistant Director Kenneth Kaiser to US Congress in the matter.  The Office of the Inspector General refuses to investigate the complaint against Kaiser to this date.
• Since the early 2000s, FBI reports warned about an "epidemic" of real estate and mortgage fraud.  Los Angeles County was distinguished as the "epicenter of the epidemic".  By 2008, the "epidemic" evolved into the ongoing financial crisis.  As part of the crisis, fraud by financial institutions in courts throughout the United States has been reported.  Regardless, US Department of Justice continues to report to the US Congress that the ongoing crisis was only the outcome of "changing market conditions", and that no criminality was found in investigation of sub-prime lenders.

Conditions in the justice system in the United States amount to generalized integrity crisis.  As was the case during the Great Depression, it is unlikely that socio-economic development and civic society conditions in the United States will improve, unless integrity of the justice system is restored.

LINKS

[i] 11-02-09 Statement of Cynthia a. Schnedar, Acting Inspector General, US Department of Justice, Before the US House Committee on Appropriations
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48558784/
[ii] 09-02-09 Transcript of Senator Leahy speech, calling for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission in re US Justice Department
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
[iii] 10-07-26 Prof Laurence Tribe's Keynote Remarks at the Annual Conference of Chief Justices calling upon the Chief Justices  to initiate actions to restore the integrity of the state courts:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35916291/
[iv] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession":
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
____

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
*  "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*     "Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
*   "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

11-02-10 Welcome Taiwan - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Taiwan - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎台湾- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Taiwan Visited February 10, 2011