Wednesday, December 28, 2011

11-12-28 Obama's Birth Certificate: Flim Flam in the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit // El fraude en los tribunales de EE.UU. // 美国法院的欺诈

US judges and clerks with no credentials issue unsigned, unauthenticated judicial records, which the US courts refuse to certify, but the public is deceived to believe are valid and effectual court records.

The United States has developed a fully blown simulated justice system.

Like the Great Depression before it, the current crisis in its core is an integrity crisis of the United States government, and like the Great Depression before it, the current crisis is not likely to be resolved, absent reform of the US courts.

Shell Game The Flim Flam Man

Following is correspondence among Ron Branson, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Gary Zerman, and Joseph Zernik regarding the recent “dismissal” of Birther Orly Taitz case at the US Court of Appeals, 9^th Circuit, challenging Obama’s credentials as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, on behalf of numerous US citizens and uniformed personnel.

_______________________________________
i. Joseph Zernik wrote:

Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:47:53 +0200
To: Paul Andrew Mitchell
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Ninth Cir. Dismisses Suit Challenging Obama's Qualifications

I fully agree, and that is why they absolutely refuse to duly serve and notice any valid paper, and in particular, refuse to certify any record of the court.

See for example, an unrelated case: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al in the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.
____
[1] 11-02-09 Press Release: Dont Ask, Dont Tell the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Simulated Appeal from a Simulated Judgment of the US District Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/

_______________________________________
ii. Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:

At 09:45 AM 12/28/2011, you wrote:

> There is no way that I know of to explain the refusal of a court to provide certified copies of its own orders,
> unless the Court itself does not consider them valid court orders.

28 U.S.C. 1691 requires that ALL such Court "process" must exhibit the Court's official seal
and the Clerk's authorized signature:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1691.html

See all of the pertinent cases we assembled here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.2.htm

And, now that the "clerks" and "deputy clerks" have either failed
or refused to produce credentials, THERE ARE NO CLERKS
authorized to sign any such "process".

That also has the necessary result that such a "court" --
where no duly authorized "clerks" can be found with proper credentials --
is rendered totally impotent because it cannot issue any "process"!!!

This conclusion is supported by the law which expressly
designates the "court" as the legal custodian of the
APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by 5 U.S.C. 3331.
See 5 U.S.C. 2906:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html

When such "clerks" refuse to produce credentials of which they
are the legal custodians designated as such by 2906 supra,
they render the entire court impotent, and also implicate themselves
in FELONY violation of 18 U.S.c. 1001 (for starters):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1001.html

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

_______________________________________
iii. Joseph Zernik wrote:

Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:59:28 +0200
To: Ron Branson, Gary Zerman , Paul Andrew Mitchell,
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Ninth Cir. Dismisses Suit Challenging Obama's Qualifications

1) The "Dismissal" by the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
"Confidence Trick", "Flim Flam", "Shell Game" - in the terminology of tricks and frauds, it is usually considered a short-term trick. You do it on the street corner, pack and leave. And here we have a person like you fooled for years by simulated orders of the courts ... [1] In fact, a whole nation fooled by a "simulated justice system" for a decade or two.

2) Obama's Birth Certificate
One of the aspects that I find most fascinating in this story, (and there are numerous fascinations here :) (:), is the fact that in my studies of Public Records, and I consider the deprivation of First Amendment right to access electronic records the mother/father (not to be sexist in such nasty context) of all evils, Birth, Marriage, Divorce, and Burial Records were among the first that emerged as Public Records in the late middle ages. Public access to Court Records has been also guaranteed in the Common Law for hundreds of years. Prisoners' Indices followed.

3) The Medieval Digital Era
The pattern we see today, of denial of public access to valid Court Records, Birth Records, and Booking Records, and the publication instead of patently fraudulent electronic records, is one of the hallmarks of what I call the Medieval-Digital Era.

In the Middle Ages the frauds in the courts and in lineages and family records were infamous, not to speak of anonymous, metal masked, castle-basement prisoners. It led to the provision in the Magna Carta (1215) of trial by peers... The "cornerstone of the Constitution of the United States".

It's 2012, and we must fight for the same rights again, to ensure public access to public records!

Joseph Zernik
____

LINKS:
[1] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
        (2) cause another to:
            (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
            (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.

The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.

_______________________________________
iv. Ron Branson wrote:

Joseph, I just looked at my Order of Dismissal filed 12/8/2011, and not only does it not have a signature, it does not even have a printed name of a person or a position. The Oder only "signs off" with the printed word "AFFIRMED" with nothing after it. We are therefore called upon to "pretend" it is verified even though it does not state.

But is not "Affirmed" supposed to be equal to "Oath or Affirmation" according to the 4th Amendment, i.e., "no warrants shall issue but ... supported by oath or affirmation." No one can imagine an oath or affirmation signed by no one. We are asked in court, "Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you God?" Accordingly, maybe these words should be eliminated prior to taking the witness stand and testifying.

Ron Branson

_______________________________________
v. Joseph Zernik wrote:

Hi Mr Branson:

I assume that as usual, you received an unsigned order, just like the order dismissing the challenge to Obama's qualifications..

Have you ever tried to ask the 9th Circuit for a certified copy of any of the orders in your cases before the Court?

I have tried, but never got any.

There is no way that I know of to explain the refusal of a court to provide certified copies of its own orders, unless the Court itself does not consider them valid court orders.

In that context, one should consider the data below, which I am asking those familiar with such papers to review and comment on.

In case you decide to ask the 9th Circuit for a certified copies of any decisions in your cases, I would be grateful if you email me PDFs of the requests, and the responses, if any.

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)

_______________________________________

vi. Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:

_______________________________________
viii. Ron Branson wrote:

At 01:45 AM 12/24/2011, Ron Branson wrote:

Pastor Wiley, I just received the announcement of the dismissing of your Ninth Circuit appeals case challenging the qualifications of Barack Obama to be president. I though I would apprise you that the I just received the dismissal of my Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit. I instantly appealed the dismissal of my suit in fraud, and paid the $455 filing fee. Five days later the Court issued a noticed of intent to dismiss the Notice of Appeal. They said the issue presented on appeal was insubstantial. There was as yet any issue presented on appeal. I opposed the Order of intent to dismiss my appeal, and I received a Dec, 6, 2011 Order dismissing my Appeal, stating "The questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument." They cite to U.S. v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857. But that case is inapplicable as it refers to a case wherein the Appellant filed an opening brief, citing his argument on appeal. Here, there is no opening brief, nor are there any questions presented on appeal.

Rule 3(c)(4) states, "An appeal must not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, or for failure to name a party whose intent to appeal is otherwise clear from the notice." My Notice of Appeal follows precisely as shown in Form 1in the Appendix. This shows a preconceived plan by the Ninth Circuit to cut off the right of appeal at the Notice stage before any appeal issues can be presented. Attached is my opposition to dismissing my Notice of Appeal.

Ron Branson

_______________________________________
ix. Gary Zerman wrote:

From: Gary Zerman
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
Subject: And Another One Bites The Dust
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:17:10 -0800

To All:

If there is one case that illustrates why we have birth certificates/records and have courts of law, it is that of Barack Obama (BO).

Yet another one bites the dust. GLZ.
____________________________________

Appeals court tosses Obama birthplace challenge

By PAUL ELIAS | AP 4 hrs ago

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) The so-called birther movement was dealt another legal blow Thursday when a federal appeals court tossed out a lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that none of the challengers had legal standing to file the lawsuit on Jan. 20, 2009, the day Obama was inaugurated. The three-judge panel cited various reasons for disqualifying six sets of plaintiffs, who included Obama's political rivals, taxpayers and military personnel.

The birther movement has filed multiple lawsuits over the issue, so far with no success. Its leaders have lost similar challenges before the U.S. Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court.

The U.S. Constitution says only "a natural born citizen" may serve as president. The challengers allege that Obama, whose father was Kenyan, was born in that African country, rather than the U.S. state of Hawaii. They claim his Hawaii birth certificate is a forgery.

The appeals court didn't address the authenticity of the birth certificate, instead ruling that the challengers couldn't show "concrete injury" from the allegations.

The taxpayers listed in the lawsuit, for instance, failed to show how the citizenship question affected any federal taxing and spending provisions.

The lawsuit was filed in 2009 by 40 plaintiffs, including conservative activists Alan Keyes and Wiley Drake, who ran for president and vice president respectively as members of the American Independent Party against Obama in 2008.

They alleged they had standing to file a lawsuit because of their interest in competing in a fair election. Libertarian Party vice-presidential candidate Gail Lightfoot was also a plaintiff.

Judge Harry Pregerson, writing for the three-judge panel, said Keyes and Drake waited too long to file their lawsuit. The election was over and Obama was already sworn in when the lawsuit was filed.

"Once the 2008 election was over and the President sworn in, Keyes, Drake, and Lightfoot were no longer 'candidates' for the 2008 general election," Pregerson wrote. "Plaintiffs' competitive interest in running against a qualified candidate had lapsed."

Orly Taitz, one of the challengers' lawyers, said she would ask the appeals court to convene a special 11-judge panel to reconsider the case. If she's turned down there, she said she would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.

Taitz said she has filed similar lawsuits in five states and has two other federal appeals pending in Washington, D.C.

http://news.yahoo.com/appeals-court-tosses-obama-birthplace-challenge-191256867.html

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group.
To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Opposition to Order Filed Oct 25"
2011Re Order to show cause-17-11.docm"

11-12-28 Racketeering by Bank of America // Crimen organizado por Bank of America // 敲诈勒索由美国银行

Supplemental Declaration of Joseph Zernik in RE: Racketeering by COUNTRYWIDE, BANK OF AMERICA, BET TZEDEK, California and US Judges and Clerks, and cover up by FBI and US Department of Justice
Following the reports of the untimely death of bank fraud whistleblower Tracy Lawrence, and his previously released Declaration (copied below), Joseph Zernik, PhD, provided a short Supplemental Declaration, regarding the nature of the frauds perpetrated on Dr Joseph Zernik by COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA.
In January 2008, the New York Times published Gretchen Morgenson’s report regarding the filing of three (3) “Recreated Letters” by Countrywide’s attorneys in the US Bankruptcy Court in Pennsylvania. The news caused the immediate collapse of Countrywide. Hundreds of false and deliberately misleading records were produced, filed, and issued in this matter as real estate, banking and judicial and clerical records, regardless of ongoing protests. If each of these records were counted as a Predicated Act per RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 18 USC § 1961–1968), then COUNTRYWIDE, BANK OF AMERICA, BRYAN CAVE, LLP, SHEPPARD MULLIN, LLP, the LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT and the other perpetrators, should all be deemed racketeers.

Shell Game The Flim Flam Man Confidence Trick
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/76635531/

Bank of America President BRIAN MOYNIHAN;
Countrywide's Chief Legal Officer SANDOR SAMUELS

December 27 - in response to requests by readers, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), released: a short Supplemental Declaration regarding the nature of the fraud perpetrated on him by Countrywide, Bank of America, and the Courts, Law Enforcement, and Banking Regulators.Supplemental Declaration of Joseph Zernik in RE: Fraud by JAE ARRE LLOYD, COUNTRYWIDE, BANK OF AMERICA, Judges, Clerk, Attorneys, Law Enforcement, and Banking Regulators
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, declare as follows:

1) In 2004 I was trying to sell my property at 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills 90212 property.

2) Upon information and belief convicted felon JAE ARRE LLOYD was trying to launder his proceeds from his previous criminality through purchasing the property under the name of NIVIE SAMAAN, a straw buyer, who was penniless.

3) I refused to review NIVIE SAMAAN's offer, presented by Real Estate Salesperson MICHAEL LIBOW (COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE), without a third party arms-length prequalification letter.

4) In response I was presented by MICHAEL LIBOW with a Prequalification Letter that later was opined as fraud by nationally renowned fraud expert BOB MASTER. [1]

5) I thus assented to the contract through fraudulent induction.

6) The contract included the standard stipulation that "Buyer shall honestly and expediently seek the required mortgage loans."

7) Unbeknown to me, JAE ARRE LLOYD and NIVIE SAMAAN, jointly filed a fraudulent government-backed Uniform Residential Real Estate Loan Applications (1003), for almost $2 millions with COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, San Rafael Branch, headed by MARIA MCLAURIN. [2]
8) Unbeknown to me, the fraud was identified by Senior Underwriter DIANE FRAZIER on day one, and the mortgage never went through in a timely manner.

9) Both the records, and my communications with DIANE FRAZIER showed that later, Branch Manager MARIA MCLAURIN removed the loan applications from the due underwriter DIANE FRAZIER, and decided to approve them and present them for funding, in blatant violation of various laws, regulations, and COUNTRYWIDE's own procedures.

10) Regardless, the loans were never funded. Their funding was "DENIED" by COUNTRYWIDE BANK.

11) During escrow it was also discovered, and later further detailed, that NIVIE SAMAAN was falsifying fax communications between her fictitious Mortgage Broker VICTOR PARKS (PACIFIC MORTGAGE CONSULTANTS), my realtor, MICHAEL LIBOW, and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS. Such communications should be deemed fax/wire/financial institution fraud. [3]
12) After the fax fraud was discovered, and after NIVIE SAMAAN failed to obtain the mortgage within the time stipulated, and failed to provide any explanation, or request an extension, I gave her due Notice to Buyer to Perform, and when she refused to perform, I canceled the contract pursuant to the law of California.

13) In 2005, NIVIE SAMAAN initiated simulated litigation [4] in the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, under Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), under a cause of actions of "Specific Performance or Breach of Contract," where:

a) No Filing Fees were paid for the complaint, but the Clerk of the Court refused to dismiss the complaint as required by law;

b) No real estate contract was filed with the complaint, and the nature of the "breach of contract" was never detailed either, but Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR denied a Demurer pursuant to the Statute off Frauds, through a simulated Demurer proceeding that was never registered by the Court.

c) All subsequent payments were listed a "Journal Entry", where in other cases of the same Court they are listed as "Motion Fees", "Notice Fees", "Stipulation Fees", etc; and the Presiding Judge CHARLES MCCOY and the Clerk of the Court JOHN A CLARKE refused to disclose the ultimate designation of these "Journal Entry" funds;

d) No judge presided with a due Assignment Order;

e) No minutes, orders, or judgment were duly served and noticed, or authenticated;

f) Fraudulent records were repeatedly produced as evidence by NIVIE SAMAAN, MICHAEL LIBOW, COLDWELL BANKER, COUNTRYWIDE, BANK OF AMERICA, BRYAN CAVE, LLP, SHEPPARD MULLIN, LLP, and admitted by judges, regardless of protests;

g) Judge Connor repeatedly generated fictitious minutes of proceedings that never took place in reality, and likewise, routinely created fictitious, 'off the record' notations for proceedings that were enacted in reality.

h) Countrywide, and later Bank of America routinely appeared as "Non Party", while the Court interchangeably designated them: "Plaintiff", "Defendant", "Cross Defendant", "Real Party in Interest", "Intervenor", and more... all with no legal foundation at all.

i) BRYAN CAVE LLP appeared on behalf of countrywide, while not their Counsel of Records, a practice detailed by US Bankruptcy Judge JEFF BOHM in his March 2008 Memorandum Opinion. [5]

j) No Judgment was entered

k) No Writ of Execution was issue by the clerk.

l) I was forced to leave my home under threat of forced, unlawful but credible by Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK.

m) Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK and others perpetrated the fraud in Grant Title, as opined by highly-decorated FBI veteran JAMES WEDICK (linked to previous Declaration of Joseph Zernik), in conveying the title to my lawful property to JAE ARRE LLOYD and NIVIE SAMAAN.

n) I was repeatedly intimidated by Sheriffs in the Court, to deny my First Amendment right to inspect court records in my own case. for over two years.

o) Secret court file was created, to hide particularly fraudulent court papers, such as those related to the false COUNTRYWIDE appearances.

p) COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA, together with judges of the court, enacted a charade, as if I was prohibited from communicating with the officers of COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA under a fictitious "Protective/Gag Order", [6] which had never existed, and which COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA refused to produce, from:

i. Demanding that COUNTRYWIDE, and later BANK OF AMERICA stop the fraud against me;

ii. Demanding that COUNTRYWIDE, and later BANK OF AMERICA name their Counsel of Record;

iii Demanding that BANK OF AMERICA respond on Complaints of fraud by senior officers, filed with the Audit Committees pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002).

14) COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA, together with BRIAN CAVE, LLP, and SHEPPARD MULLIN, LLP, and judges of the Court, enacted various other charades, where they pretended to imposed on me serious monetary sanctions, and threaten me with jail. Later, they refused to disclose the destination of the funds, thus fraudulently collected. [7]
15) Through such conduct, I was in fact unlawfully held by the Court from 2004-2010, in what should be deemed extortion under the Color of Law.

16) in January 2007, I filed my complaints with FBI, SEC, OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, FEDERAL RESERVE detailing the fraud on me, as an individual, on the shareholders and on the tax payers, almost a full year before the fraud was consummated.

17) No law enforcement agency has provided me protection against these frauds to this date.

18) In January 2008, the New York Times published Gretchen Morgenson’s report regarding the filing of three (3) “Recreated Letters” by Countrywide’s attorneys in the US Bankruptcy Court in Pennsylvania. The news caused the immediate collapse of Countrywide. [8]
19) Only a small fraction of the frauds perpetrated by the various parties in this matter were outlined in instant Supplemental Declaration. If each and every false and deliberately misleading paper filed by the various parties, and each and every false and deliberately misleading record filed and admitted as evidence, and each and every false and deliberately misleading simulated judicial and clerical record in this case were counted as a Predicated Act, pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 18 USC 1961-1968, there were hundreds of such Predicated Acts in this matter, over the period of some 5 years. This conduct continued regardless of continued protests from early 2007 to 2010.

Signed this date: December 28, 2011, here in Jerusalem,

__________
Joseph Zernik

LINKS
[1] 04-09-27 Opinion Letter by Fraud Expert ROBERT MEISTER re: Prequalification Letter of NIVIE SAMAAN by VICTOR PARKS and Countrywide's Uniform Residential Loan Applications (1003) of NIVIE SAMAAN
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29714059/

[2] 04-09-27 Opinion Letter by Fraud Expert ROBERT MEISTER re: Prequalification Letter of NIVIE SAMAAN by VICTOR PARKS and Countrywide's Uniform Residential Loan Applications (1003) of NIVIE SAMAAN
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29714059/

[3] 04-10-18 - 20 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Email Correspondence of Realtor Michael Libow with person represented as Victor Parks -- evidence of wire/fax fraud by Nivie Samaan
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31669118/
04-09-27 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Nivie Samaan's Fraudulent Uniform Residential Loan Applications (1003) Pertaining to Property at 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, and Their Fraudulent Underwriting by Countrywide Home Loans, Inc s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25695526/

[4] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
        (2) cause another to:
            (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
            (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[5] 08-03-05 Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25001966/
[6] 07-07-06 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) "Non Party" Countrywide: Ex parte application for a Protective/Gag Order s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25002347/

[7] 09-01-13 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Bank of America and Bryan Cave LLP filing, on behalf of "Non Party" Countrywide - Notice of Motion Sanctions Contempt v Dr Zernik
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305245/

[8] 08-01-08 Case of Borrower Hills (01-22574) in the US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Countrywide’s three "recreated letters", transcript, and news reports:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25003494/

_________

Boycott the vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/
____
Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)

The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______

Flag Counter: 128http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 686,060Followers: 1,229http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 585,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 millionby 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/____________________________ As part of efforts for the preservation of our civilization for future generations:

A call for proposals, ending January 10, 2012.

#Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds - the Party!

Late August 2012

Love, Peace, Justice

Empowering the People through
a dance/music/art/study/pray
celebration
READ MORE:http://josephsdream2012.wordpress.com/
VIEW VIDEO:11-12-12 Oh My God, it's Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWTKQkodf7U