משה סילמן, נט המשפט, ומחוזי תל-אביב – מערכת ספרים כפולים – טבלת סיכום // S-12-11-24 Silman, Net HaMishpat, and the Tel-Aviv District Court – a double books system – table summary

The records, which were discovered in the office of the clerk's case management system under the purported appeal file (6909-01-10) on November 19, 2012, are different that the records that are displayed in the online public access system. Only one (1) out of eight (8) decisions appears in the online public access system, and none of the decisions, which are listed in the Court's case management system were served on the Requester.  Such decisions should all be deemed simulated decisions. The case of Moshe Silman uniquely documents the way that new electronic record systems in the Israeli courts and Net HaMishpat in particular, are used as "double books", out of compliance with basic notions of Fair and Public Hearings and national tribunals for protection of Rights.  Over the past decade, in parallel to the implementation of new electronic record systems, the courts of the State of Israel were corrupted in an unprecedented manner.  During this period Aharon Barak and later Dorit Beinisch served as Presiding Justices of the Supreme Court.

ההחלטות שהתגלו בביקור במערכת ניהול הכתבים האלקטרוניים במזכירות בית המשפט ביום ה-19 בנובמבר., 2012, תחת תיק הערעור כביכול (6909-01-10) שונות מן הכתבים המוצגים במערכת המקוונת לניהול גישת הציבור לתיקים במקרה זה.  רק אחת משמונה (8) ההחלטות, הרשומות במערכת ניהול הכתבים האלקטרוניים במזכירות מופיעה גם במערכת המקוונת לניהול גישת הציבור לתיקים, ואף לא אחת מן ההחלטות לא הומצאו ונמסרו למבקש בעניין זה. מקרהו של משה סילמן חשף בצורה ייחודית  את הדרכים בהן מערכות הכתבים האלקטרוניים של בתי המשפט בישראל, ובמיוחד נט המשפט, משמשים כ"ספרים כפולים", תוך הפרת מושגי היסוד לגבי משפט הוגן וציבורי ובתי משפט לאומיים להגנה על זכויות.  בעשור האחרון, במקביל להנהגת מערכות כתבים אלקטרוניים חדשות, הושחתו בתי המשפט בישראל בצורה חסרת תקדים. בתקופה זאת כיהנו כנשיאי בית המשפט העליון אהרון ברק ודורית בייניש.

The Table, below, shows:

·         Six (6) purported decisions of the Court, which were not served and delivered on the Requester in this matter.

·         At least one (1) case, possibly two, of deliberate ex-parte communications between the Court and other parties in the case through requests and decisions, which were not served and delivered on Dr Zernik- the Requester in this matter.

·         The existence of at least one (1) more recent purported decision of the Court, on an unknown request, which was never served on Dr Zernik, and which was not discovered during the November 19, 2012 visit to the office of the Clerk of the Court.

Interaction with the office of the clerk, which led to the discovery of the records on November 19, 2012, also documented:

• Refusal of the office of the clerk to permit access to the list of records (docket) in a case, even to a party to the matter.
• Refusal of the office of the clerk to permit access to the listings, which certify service by the Court of its own records.
• Refusal of the office of the clerk to permit access to listing, which certify the assignment of the case to the appropriate judicial authority.

הטבלה להלן מורה על:

∙ שש (6) החלטות כביכול של בית המשפט, שלא הומצאו ונמסרו למבקש בעניין זה.

∙ מקרה אחד (1) לפחות, ייתכן שניים, בו ניהל בית המשפט תכתובת עם צד אחד בלבד על ידי בקשות והחלטות שלא הומצאו ונמסרו למבקש, דר' צרניק.

∙ קיומה של החלטה אחת (1) לפחות מן החדשים האחרונים, בעניין לא ידוע, שלא נמסרה לדר' צרניק, ושלא נתגלתה במהלך הביקור במזכירות ב-19 לנובמבר, 2012.

הביקור במזכירות בית המשפט גם העלה:

∙ בית המשפט מסרב להתיר לבעל העניין לעיין ברשימת הכתבים (רשימת הבקשות, רשימת ההחלטות).

∙ בית המשפט מסרב להתיר לבעל העניין לעיין ברשימת המצאת ההחלטות על ידי בית המשפט בעניינו.

∙ בית המשפט מסרב להתיר לבעל העניין לעיין ברישום, המאשר את הפניית התיק לגורם השיפוטי המתאים.

LINKS:

[1] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert,  Appendix I to Submission; 15th UPR - State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU   

[2] 12-10-11 Human Right Alert, Appendix IV to Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel - "The case of Moshe Silman"

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5Q3loSEprNVNPVm8

Table 1: Silman and the Tel-Aviv District Court – double books system

#	Request	Decision records, discovered in the case management system of the clerk on November 19, 2012 [[i]]	Appearance of decision records in the online public access system of the Court [[ii],[iii]]	Service and delivery of decision by the Court
1	Filed by Silman's Counsel on January 5, 2010 – Request to extend time for filing an appeal. [i]	Unnumbered - January 28, 2010 Decision by Judge Hagai Brenner – denial of request to extend time to file an appeal. The "Post-it Decision" is superimposed on Silman's January 5, 2010 Request for Extending Time to File and Appeal.  Exhibit AA – December 31, 2010 Decision of Magistrate Barzel of the Supreme Court, referring the Appeal to the Tel-Aviv District Court; Exhibit A – November 19, 2009 Decision of Magistrate Hagai Brenner, in which the Appeal originated. Exhibit B – Protocol of November 19, 2009 Proceeding.	No	No
2	Filed by Zernik on July 22, 2012: Request to inspect and to copy [[iv]]	Request #4 – July 24, 2012 Decision by Magistrate Hagai Brenner – seeking responses by the parties or their heirs. The "Post-it Decision" is superimposed on Dr Joseph Zernik's July 22, 2012 Request to Inspect and to Copy.	No	No
3	Filed by Zernik on July 29, 2012: Request for due service of court decisions. [[v]]	Request #5 – July 29, 2012 Decision by Magistrate Hagai Brenner – referring to his July 24, 2012 Decision.  The "Post-it Decision" is superimposed on Dr Joseph Zernik's July 29, 2012 Request for a signed and certified copy of the January 31, 2010 Decision in the same file.	No	No
4	Filed by Silman's Counsel on July 30, 2012: Notice of ending representation. [i]	Request #6 – July 30, 2012 Decision by Magistrate Hagai Brenner, granting Attorney Man's July 30, 2012 Request to Relieved of Representation of Silman. NOTICE: ·         This paper was filed as a NOTICE, with no due service on other parties. ·         This paper was registered as a REQUEST. ·         DECISION was issued on the REQUEST, which was not served on the other parties as well. This paper, and the respective decision should be deemed ex-parte communication between the Court and Attorney Elad Man, on a matter that was essential for Requester Dr Zernik to perform his duties.	No	No
5	?	? NOTICE: ·         Request #7? -  no copy was provided by the office of the clerk on November 19, 2012 of the Decision, if any, and the corresponding Request. ·         No paper was filed between july 30 and August 5, 2012 by Zernik.  Therefore, this filing is likely to represent another ex-parte communication between the Court and other parties.	No	No
6	Filed by Zernik on August 5, 2012: Statement of Disqualification for a Cause of Hagai Brenner. [4]	Request #8 – August 30, 2012 Decision by Judge Hagai Brenner - deeming as moot request for his own disqualification for a cause.  The "Post-it Decision" is superimposed on Dr Joseph Zernik's August 5, 2012 Statement of Disqualification for a Cause of both Magistrate and Judge Hagai Brenner.	No	No
7	Filed by Zernik on November 1, 2012: Request to Expedite Process. [5]	Request #9 – November 4, 2012 Decision by Judge Ofra Cherniak – recusing herself from the case, and referring it back to "Rasham [male magistrate-jz], who according to pervious decisions is handling the case."  The Decision record is a stand alone, signed record, albeit it is not certified by the office of the Clerk of the Court.	Yes	No
8	Filed by Zernik on November 1, 2012: Request to Expedite Process. [5]	Request #9 – November 4, 2012 Decision by "Rashemet" [female magistrate –jz] Tamar Avrahami, asking the office of the Clerk of the Court to serve Dr Zernik all decisions since July 24, 2012.	No	No

LINKS:

---

[i] 12-11-19 Moshe Silman et al v Bituach Leumi et al (6909-01-10) - Appeal in the Tel Aviv District Court – electronic records – clerk's terminal

http://www.scribd.com/doc/114109644/

[ii] 12-11-17 Moshe Silman et al v Bituach Leumi et al (6909-01-10) in the Tel Aviv District Court – online public records – remote terminal

http://www.scribd.com/doc/113622603/

[iii] 12-11-19 Moshe Silman et al v Bituach Leumi et al (6909-01-10) - Appeal in the Tel Aviv District Court – electronic records – local terminal

http://www.scribd.com/doc/114114053/

[iv] 12-07-22 Moshe Silman v Bituach Leumi-Tel-Aviv Branch, Legal Department (6909-01-10) Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision in the Tel-Aviv-Jaffa District Court electronic Public Records - local terminal

http://es.scribd.com/doc/101008615/

[v] 12-07-29 Moshe Silman v Social Security and State of Israel (1752/08 and 6909-01-10) in the Tel Aviv District Court - Requests for Certified Orders (Heb + Eng) s

http://es.scribd.com/doc/101723398/