Whoever thought that judges can address their peers’ corruption, must be delusional…
From online discussion group, original title – No judge in the US holds a lawful Oath of Office…
Corrupt California Judge (Ret) Jacqueline Connor – one of the leaders of the LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) - and former LAPD undercover narcotic officer Rafael Perez - key figures in the Rampart Scandal (1998-2000).
VIEW THE COMPLETE DISCUSSION AS PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/134648903/
VIEW THE COMPLETE DISCUSSION AS PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/134648903/
On Monday, April 8, 2013 2:06:47 AM UTC+3, Joseph Zernik, Human Rights Alert (NGO) wrote:
1) THE BIG PICTURE
To make the story more complete, let me add the following:
Corrupt California Judge Jacqueline Connor was one of the leaders of the LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). Her position as such was established in the Rampart Scandal (1998-2000):
Before the scandal erupted, she had already been known as a Rampart Judge, for her close relationship with the undercover narcotic unit of the LAPD Rampart station. She was also known for her close friendship with Rafael Perez - later the key figure in the scandal (with Connor).
When the scandal erupted, it was misrepresented as an LAPD corruption scandal. In fact, as pointed out by Erwin Chemerinky (then at USC) and by David Burcham (then Dean of Loyola Law School), the LA Superior Court judges were the crux of the corruption.
* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)
* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Irvine Law School (2000)
* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Irvine Law School (2000)
Once the scandal erupted, Connor appeared as the trial judge in the First Rampart Trial (2001). As such, she did her best to undermine the prosecution of 4 LAPD undercover narcotic officers, probably to save her own skin. When that did not work, and 3 were convicted by the jury, she overturned the jury conviction in her infamous ruling from home, on Friday night, just before Christmas. The reason - she claimed that she tainted the jury through her erroneous jury instructions - a brilliant fraud on the court!
Another key figure in the scandal was then US Attorney for the Central District of California – Alejandro Majorkas (he too served on the board of Bet Tzedek – the Los Angeles “House of Justice” – a prominent Jewish charity and an affiliate of the Los Angeles Jewish Federation...). At the time he was considered a brilliant young legal talent... Majorkas permitted the LAPD the LA District Attorney, and the LA Superior Court to investigate, prosecute and adjudicate their own corruption... Last I checked Majorkas was Director of Citizenship Services...
In the 1990s the main line of business of the LA-JR (LA Judiciary Racket) was in controlling the wholesale drug markets in Los Angeles. [1,2] I believe that such conduct started at least as early as the early 1980s, with CIA’s wholesale cocaine trafficking to Los Angeles under Iran-Contra during the Reagan administration.
Effectively, under Reagan, through Iran-Contra, Los Angeles was established as an extra-constitutional zone. [3]
At least by the late 1990s, the LA-JR branched into the more lucrative field of real estate and banking fraud through simulated litigation of such cases. The earliest such case that I could document started in 1998 – Galdjie v Darwish. [4]
By the early 2000s, FBI reports distinguished LA County as "the epicenter of a real estate and mortgage fraud". I believe that it was the synergy between the LA Superior Court and LA County-based Countrywide that led to such distinction. I believe that it was also the reason for the exceptionally fast growth of Countrywide...
Today, the practice is widespread in the state and US courts from coast to coast - key element, often overlooked in the current financial crisis. That is also the true reason that, as Eric Holder pointed out, banks cannot be criminally prosecuted in the US today.
The case I documented in most details of simulated litigation in the current financial crisis is in SEC v Bank of America Corporation in the US District Court, Southern District of NY, under corrupt US Judge Jed Rakoff. [4]
LINKS:
[1] 12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisis
[2] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) s
[3] 10-10-13 Extra Constitutional Zones - Excerpts From Discussion on the OAK Boardhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/39302595/
[4] Galdjie v Darwish - racketeering by judges and attorneys in Los Angeles County, California
[4] Galdjie v Darwish - racketeering by judges and attorneys in Los Angeles County, California
[5] 12-09-04 Zernik, J., "Design and Operation of the Electronic Record Systems of the US Courts are Linked to Failing Banking Regulation", Data Analytics 1:83-93 (2012)
http://thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=data_analytics_2012_3_50_60059
On Monday, April 8, 2013 1:07:31 AM UTC+3, Joseph Zernik, Human Rights Alert (NGO) wrote:
On Monday, April 8, 2013 1:07:31 AM UTC+3, Joseph Zernik, Human Rights Alert (NGO) wrote:
2) MORE ON SIMULATED LITIGATION - WHEN SUING JUDGES FOR CORRUPTION
I guess I still have not answered the question:
What happens when you try to sue a judge that ran on you simulated litigation?
Well, Richard Fine never did that, but I had done it, even before Richard Fine was arrested.
So here it goes:
In 2008 I filed complaint in the US District Court, Central District of California, under Zernik v Connor et al. Jacqueline Connor, first named defendant was a judge of the LA Superior Court, and one of the leading figures of the LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). Some 10 judges of the LA Superior Court, as well as the Clerk of the Court were named defendants under Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law.
The conduct I was detailing amounted to racketeering, but after reading on the subject, I decided that filing a RICO complaint was above my head, and settled for the above cause of action.
1) No attorney would file such complaint
The reason I had to do it pro se was that no attorney in Los Angeles agreed to help me, not even anonymously. Some of them had strange explanation, why it should not be done. Others simply explained that it was too dangerous for them...
2) Summonses
The case started with the corrupt office of the Clerk of the US District Court, Central District of California Terry Nafisi refusing to issue me summonses.
Two emergency petitions, filed with the corrupt 9th Circuit, to compel the office of the US District Court to issue the summonses, were summarily denied with no explanation at all.
3) First amendment right to file papers in court
In parallel, the office of the clerk of the US District Court, Central District of California, denied me the right to file any papers, which included evidence of the corruption of the LA Superior Court. That included, for example, an opinion letter by probably the best fraud expert in the US - retired FBI agent James Wedick, who amazingly agreed to issue an opinion letter on the subject. Wedick had been decorated by US Attorney General, by FBI Director, and by US Congress for his achievements in law enforcement - he was key figure in Abscam... [1] Wedick’s letter specifically referred to conduct of David Pasternak, former President of the LA Bar Association, and former President of Bet Tzedek. The clerk of the US District Court issued on all such papers perverted "Discrepancy Notices." [2]
Moreover, the clerk explained to me that he was doing so at the explicit instruction of corrupt US Magistrate Carla Woehrle. She was the same one who later perverted Richard Fine's habeas corpus petition.
Later, I tried it again in the US District Court, Washington DC, with a little different approach. In Zernik v Melson et al I sued Fast and Furious Kenneth Melson (US DOJ) and Kenneth Kaiser (FBI Assistant Director for Criminal Investigations) in a petition to Compel a US Officer to Perform His Duties. I asked for Equal Protection of the 10 million people of LA County against the LA-JR.
Corrupt US Judge Richard Leon took the same approach as Woehrle, with a slightly different bent: All my papers that included evidence of judicial corruption were returned with the hand inscription "Leave to File Denied" on their faces, signed by Richard Leon.
Bill Windsor's experience with Judge Richard Leon was exactly the same. [3]
3) Appearance of unauthorized attorneys with "no communication with client" clause
Another key element of simulated litigation in cases of this kind, and also in cases involving banksters, is the appearance on behalf of the defendants of attorneys with no authorization by the clients and with "no communication with client" clause.
This part of the routine was best described by US Bankruptcy Court, Texas, Jeff Boehm in early 2008, in a case involving Countrywide, where Sandor Samuels (President of Bet Tzedek) was Chief Legal Officer at the time. [4] It is a standard procedure in many or most foreclosure and similar litigation cases involving the banks. You would not find in such cases any paper that is signed by the client (e.g. no declaration or affidavit by an officer of the bank), or even any paper that was derived from the client. The attorneys for the banks would work strictly from records he or she obtained from public databases.
In cases involving judges, it is even simpler... The attorney is not even hired by the defendants. Instead the attorney is hired by the California Judicial Council. The perversion of the process here is in issuing deliberately false authorization letter to the respective attorney. I best documented it in the case of Richard Fine. The case was Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County. But in response to requests to the California Judicial Council, they insisted in calling the case Fine v Sheriff of the Court... [5]
4) Issuing of unauthenticated orders and judgments in the US District Courts
As is the case in the LA Superior Court, key element of simulated litigation in the US courts is the issuance of unauthenticated orders and judgments. However, due to the differences between the electronic record systems of the LA Superior Court (Sustain) and the systems of the US courts (PACER and CM/ECF), the records look differently. In the US District Courts, issuing unauthenticated orders and judgments comes as orders and judgments, accompanied by NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing), which is missing the "Electronic Document Stamp", which is the fraudulent way that electronic signatures were implemented in these systems.
In such cases, papers, which were electronically filed by parties to the case may be authenticated by an NEF bearing the "electronic document stamp", but none of the minutes, orders, or judgments would bear that stamp. [6]
Summary
The above is only a short summary of the highlights of simulated litigation practices. Anyone, who is seriously interested in the subject, should review the more detailed Motion to Intervene in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) in the Supreme Court [6]
Because of the extensive documentation, I consider the case of Richard Fine a historic landmark case. It documented the operation in concert of the following fraudulent electronic record systems:
1) LA Superior Court - SUSTAIN
2) Sheriff of Los Angeles - INMATE INFORMATION CENTER
3) US District Courts - PACER & CM/ECF I
4) US Courts of Appeals - PACER & CM/ECF II
5) US Supreme Court - UNNAMED
LINKS:
[1] 07-12-17 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) David Pasternak: Grant Deeds in re: 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, opined as fraud by James Wedick
08-08-21 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Email letter by highly decorated FBI veteran, James Wedick, regarding refusal to Investigate FBI to provide Dr Zernik protection against real estate fraud - corruption in Los Angeles County courts
[2] 09-04-09 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California, Dkt #105: Compiled Records of Perverted Discrepancy Notices
[3] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC – master of the “Leave to file denied”
[4] 08-03-05 Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:
[5] 10-03-19b Richard Fine: Dr Zernik - Mr Carrizosa's Correspondence on behalf of the California Judicial Council in re: Case Caption in engagement of Attorney McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)
[6] 10-01-01 Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-01550) - CM/ECF - Table Summary of NEFs in Zernik v Connor, based on copies provided by Clerk on December 29, 2009
[7] 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Face pages of five filings by Dr Joseph Zernik, with stamps showing receipt by the US Supreme Court s
10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 1 Amended Motion to Intervene s
10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 2 Amended Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer s
10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 3 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records s
10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference s
10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Dr Zernik's Motion to Intervene 5 Amended Appendices s
10-04-18 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5 Amended Appendix IX b: Zernik's Declaration in re: April 16, 2010 search for records in the Courts microfilm judgments archive s
10-04-22 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court - Dr Zernik's Declaration RE: Court Counsel Danny Bickell and Filing at US Supreme Court
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcome... especially any tips regarding corruption of the courts in Los Angeles. Anonymous tips are fine. One simple way to do it is from internet cafes, etc.