Sunday, July 7, 2013

13-07-07 US: Only lawyers can now argue before the Supreme Court...

At first, the change may seem amazing, but in hindsight - perhaps not surprising. Clamping down on dissent.  Lawyers are easier to intimidate.  Let's permit access only to those we can easily control. jz
_______


Jul 1, 10:33 AM EDT

ONLY LAWYERS NOW CAN ARGUE BEFORE SUPREME COURT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- You must be a lawyer to argue before the Supreme Court.
Thought that already was the case? It wasn't until Monday, when the Supreme Court revised its 80-page rule book for the first time since 2010.
The update covers items such as filing deadlines but also adds Rule 28.8, which requires anyone arguing before the court to be a lawyer. The high court says the new rule simply codifies a "long-standing practice of the court."
A non-lawyer hasn't argued before the justices in more than three decades, though not for a lack of trying. A magazine publisher, entrepreneur and paralegal-in-training asked but were turned down, the paralegal-in-training in the past year.
READ MORE:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_LAWYERS_ONLY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcome... especially any tips regarding corruption of the courts in Los Angeles. Anonymous tips are fine. One simple way to do it is from internet cafes, etc.