2014-08-13 UN Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States (2014) - Human Rights Alert (NGO) draft submission

2014-08-13 Human Right Alert: United States DRAFT UPR Submission (2014)

Large-scale fraud in IT systems of the US courts - unannounced regime change?

Executive Summary

Wide segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect. Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed voided, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United States and the US Constitution.

Allegations:

1. The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and the US Constitution are effectively suspended, access to the courts is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite.

Evidence:

IT system analysis documents: a) Servers of unverified identity; b) Invalid implementation of electronic signatures (including invisible electronic signatures - “The Emperor's New Cloths”); c) Invalid implementation of authentication, certification, and service procedures; d) Establishing of “double books” systems, where the public and pro-se parties (those, who are represented by attorneys) cannot see true and complete court records; e) Invalid implementation of authorities and permissions, so that unauthorized persons can access the courts' data base and make entries in dockets; f) Discrimination in access to the courts, where attorneys are permitted access to CM/ECF, but not pro-se parties, and attorneys are permitted to enter papers in the US district court dockets with no prior review by the clerk of the court; g) Universal failure to docket summonses; h) Adulteration and deletion of court records.

Case studies document the outcome of conduct of simulated litigation in matters involving deprivation of liberty and property, as well as fundamental constitutional matters.

Conclusions:

1. Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated (fake/sham) litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of individuals, and place the banks above the law. 2. Such conduct amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the people of the United States. 3. Such conduct is also central to the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and judicial records, originating in the United States, and the validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature of the current regime in the United States, and any claims that its foreign policy is driven by Human Rights interests. 6. Efforts to address conditions, which have been established in the United States, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by powerful US security, legal, and financial groups and their interests.

Recommendations:

Emerging from the current conditions would require a fundamental corrective process in the United States, where as a result of current conditions, the political process is undermined: 1. The large-scale fraud in the US courts, which in fact implicates each and every US sitting judge, would likely require an approach such as a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2. Due to the central role of the Administrative Office of the US Courts in implementing the fraudulent IT systems of the US courts, the Office should be restructured or closed. 3. Measures, similar to those taken a century ago under similar circumstances through the Salary Act (1919), which placed the clerks of the US courts under the direct authority of the Attorney General, should be considered. 4. US legal and computing experts should be employed in an initiative to restore the integrity of the IT systems of the US courts, under accountability to the US Congress, with the goal of making such system as transparent to the public at large as possible. 5. In nations, where the separation of branches is established by law, the courts must not be permitted to develop and implement the courts' IT systems. 6. Human Rights and internet activists must keep a watchful eye on the validity and integrity of IT systems of the courts and prisons.

Online Appendix:

To be completed

===2014-08-13 UN Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States (2014) - Human Rights Alert (NGO) draft submission===
Filed today with US State Department for corrections, comments.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/236702601/

2014-08-13 UN Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States (2014) - Human...

www.scribd.com

As filed with US State Department for corrections,...