2016-11-02 Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery...

Zadorov affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery…

Repeat inquiry (fourth or fifth) was filed yesterday with Supreme Court “Chief Clerk”, requesting duly signed and certified copies of decision records in Zadorov’s case: Purported “Decision” by Magistrate Gilead Lubinsky, which denied access to inspect the original paper decision records from Zadorov’s trial with under the ruse of a “jumble” in the court file, and purported “Judgment” by Justice Salim Joubran, which denied an appeal from such “Decision”…

All previous forgeries of decision records were committed by Mr Danny Levy, staff member of the Office of the Clerk of no authority at all. However, the latest series of falsified, fraudulent records were produced under the name of “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul (a pretender). The latest series is also characterized by the complex fraud…

Roman Zadorov is confined by the Israeli authorities for 10 years. The last 6 of them – as purported convict, who was purportedly found guilty in the murder of 13 yo Tair Rada. However, following intensive search, it is obvious by now that there is no valid judgment record in his case. Attorney Feldman, who was his pro bono counsel in the appeal, wrote that the judgment record were lost in “the wailing wind across the vast Jezreel Valley”…

The fraud by judges of the Nazareth District Court and the Supreme Court in the Zadorov affair are uniquely despicable. The case of the Ukrainian Roman Zadorov in Israel is the mirror image of the Jewish Mendel Beillis affair in the Ukraine a century ago!

Read in blog: 

Figures 1: Magistrate Gilead Lubinsky, Justice Salim Joubran, “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul (a pretender). There is no reasonable explanation for conduct of the Supreme Court, except for fraud, which is aimed at withholding the evidence of fraud by the Nazareth Court judges in the Zadorov trial.
_____

OccupyTLV, November 02 – repeat inquiry was filed yesterday with Supreme Court “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul for obtaining duly signed and certified copies of decisions in the Zadorov affair: [1]

a) June 02, 2016 “Decision” by Magistrate Gilead Lubinsky, under Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10), which denied access to inspect the original paper decision records in State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502/07), with the reasoning of a “jumble” in the court file. That - when the law in Israel says that "any person is permitted to inspect decisions that tare not lawfully prohibited for publication", and the Supreme Court declared the right to inspect "a fundamental principle in any democratic regime... constitutional, supra-statutory..."

b) June 26, 2016 “Decision” and August 04, 2016 “Judgment” by Justice Salim Joubran, under Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/16), which denied an appeal from Magistrate Lubinsky’s “Decision”.

Regardless of a series of requests for duly signed and certified copies of such decision records, the Supreme Court consistently provides only falsified, fraudulent records. Previous forgeries of falsified decision records were perpetrated by Mr Danny Levy of the Criminal Division, a staff member of no authority at all to certify court records.

However, the latest series of forgeries, [2] which were received in response on a previous inquiry and request, [3] were perpetrated by Ms Idit Melul, “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court. The latest series of forgeries is also characterized by the complex pattern of fraud:

1. “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul continues to refuse to provide documentation of her lawful appointment.

In response on Freedom of Information request for documentation of Ms Idit Melul’s lawful appointment as “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court, the Administration of Courts provided invalid records.

In a previous meeting in Ms Melul’s office, she also refused to answer: Under whose authority was she appointed “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court?

Therefore, the previous inquiry contained a special article, which asked for documentation of Ms Idit Melul – if she were to sign the certification on behalf of the Supreme Court. Ms Melul provided none.

Ms Idit Melul should be deemed a “Pretender”, falsely appearing as “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court.

2. “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul answered in a letter with no reference number.

Such letter should be deemed an informal, off the record document, or simply put – a “fabrication”.

3. “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul answered in a lawfully unsigned letter.

The letter, which was received by mail, shows a “graphic signature” instead of an authentic hand-signature. As explicitly clarified in Ombudsman of the Judiciary Decision in the Judge Varda Alshech “Fabricated Protocols” scandal, such record has no validity at all. Varda Alshech and the Ombudsman were in full agreement that such record was merely a “Draft”.

Figure 2: “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul September 08, 2016 response letter was received by paper mail. The letter fails to be lawfully signed by a hand signature. Instead, it bears an invalid “graphic signature”. Ombudsman of the Judiciary Decision in the Judge Varda Alshech “Frabricated Protocols” scandal makes it clear: Court records, which are signed by “graphic signature” only are invalid, merely ‘drafts’.
_____

4. “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul refused to provide a lawfully signed and certified copy of Magistrate Lubinsky’s Decision, pertaining to the “jumble” in Zadorov’s file, using an incredible ruse.

The requests to inspect the original decision records in the trial paper court file – State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502/07) - was filed I the Supreme Court under the appeal court file – Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) – since the Supreme Court held the Nazareth District Court file at that time. Ms Idit Melul refused to provide a lawfully signed and certified copy of Magistrate Lubinsky “Decision”, which denied access to inspect the trial court file with the reasoning of a “jumble” in the court file. Ms Idit Melul provide an incredible ruse as the justification for her refusal:

Since you are not a party to criminal appeal court file 7939/10, you would not be able to receive copies of any decisions in the case.

According to such incredible ruse, Requester of Inspection is not permitted to obtain a valid copy of the court decision on his own request in the courts of the State of Israel…

5. “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul provided perverted, invalid records as purported certified copies of Justice Salim Joubran’s “Decisions”, originating from Magistrate Lubinsky’s “jumble” “Decision”

The August 16, 2016 request, which was filed with both the Supreme Court (in the court file) and with “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul, explicitly stated that the certified copies of the Supreme Court’s decision records are required for filing outside the State of Israel (as an appendix to the Complaint, which was filed with the UN Human Rights Council – Working Group on Arbitrary Detention). Therefore, the Supreme Court was asked to provide copies of its records, which would be deemed pursuant to the Hague-Apostille Convention (1961). According to the Convention, of which Israel is a party, valid copies of court decision records must show the signature of the appropriate judicial authority and certification, “True Copy of the Original” by the Chief Clerk or Magistrate of the Court.

However, the copies of Justice Salim Joubran’s “Decisions”, which were provided by “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul, bear the certification, “True Copy of the Original”, on copies that do not show Justice Joubran’s signatures (Figures 3).

  
 

Figures 3: False certifications, “True Copy of the Original”, of “Decision” and “Judgment” by Justice Salim Joubran in the appeal Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/10), which were mailed by Supreme Court “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul. The appeal in this court file originated in Supreme Court Magistrate Lubinsky’s “Decision”, which denied access to inspect the original paper decision records in Zadorov’s trial court file with the reasoning of a “jumble” in the court file… The copies, which were mailed by “Chief Clerk” Melul fail to show any signature by Justice Salim Joubran. The request, which was filed with Ms Melul explicitly stated that the certified record were required for filing outside the State of Israel, as an appendix to Complaint, which was filed with the UN Human Rights Council – Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. Therefore, the request explicitly asked for copies that would be deemed valid pursuant to the Hague-Apostille Convention (1961) – showing signatures of the corresponding judges and certification by a Chief Clerk or Magistrate of the Court.
_____

Roman Zadorov: The poster child of fraud and “fabrications” by Israeli judges

Roman Zadorov has been confined by the Israeli authorities for 10 years, of which the last 6 – as purported Tair Rada murder convict, who was purportedly sentenced to life in prison. However, regardless of intensive searches with Zadorov’s defense counsel and repeat inspections in the Nazareth District Court and the Supreme Court – no lawful, valid “Verdict” and “Sentencing” records have been discovered to this date (Figure 4).

In contrast with the decision records in the paper court file, the 2010 “Verdict” and “Sentencing” records were purportedly issued in Net-HaMishpat case management system, following its implementation in the Nazareth District Court in January 2010.

Attorney Avigdor Feldman, Zadorov’s pro bono defense counsel in the Supreme Court appeal, wrote that the 2010 Nazareth judgment records were lost “in the wailing wind across the vast Jezreel Valley… “ [which Nazareth overlooks – jz]

Attorney Galil Spiegel, Zadorov’s defense counsel in the Nazareth District Court trial, has not provided to this date a reasonable explanation for the filing of unsigned judgment records with the Notice of Appeal in the Supreme Court, and the loss of the valid, signed judgment records, which purportedly were in her possession in 2010… [4]

 
 

Figure 4: Regardless of intensive searches, no valid “Verdict of the Nazareth District Court, pertaining to Roman Zadorov has been discovered to this date: a) The signature box of the purported “Verdict” record, which was filed by Attorney Galil Spiegel with the “Notice of Appeal” in the Supreme Court in 2010 (discovered during inspection of the original records – paper court file in the Supreme Court), instead of a lawfully signed and certified, “True Copy of the Original”, record. b) The signature box in the purported “Verdict” record, which was discovered in the Office of the Clerk of the Nazareth District Court in 2016, but which fails to appear in the “Decisions Docket”, or the “Judgment Docket” in the electronic court file. The Chief Clerk of the Nazareth District Court refuses to certify such record, “True Copy of the Original”.

______

The fraud by the Nazareth District Court judges and the Supreme Court justices in the case of Roman Zadorov is uniquely despicable.

The Ukrainian Roman Zadorov case in Israel is the mirror image of the Jewish Mendel Beilis case in the Ukraine a century ago.

Israeli judges in general are routinely engaged in fraud by fabricating court process and court records a la Varda Alshech… they imagined up for themselves immunity for criminality on the bench...

Over the past 20 years, integrity of the Israeli courts has dramatically deteriorated. In a free discussion by “Senior Legal Scholars”, which was recently published, one of them describes the situation as “a total jungle in the court. Do anything you can not to get there”. Others described the judges as such that disregard the facts and the law on a routine basis. [5]

The Senior Legal Scholars discussed the “total jungle” as originating from “a decline in formalism and increase in values”. In fact, the circumstances originate in routine fraud by the judges – conduct of simulated process and publication of simulated court records. This type of fraud was documented in details in the Judge Varda Alshech “Fabricated Protocols” scandal. Net-HaMishpat system and IT systems of the Supreme Court are the fraud tools.

The Zadorov affair demonstrates this condition in a particularly serious fashion.

The Israeli judges made up for themselves immunity for criminality on the bench…

The Israeli court today are patently incompetent courts!

LINKS:

[1] 2016-11-01 Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) and Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/16) in the Supreme Court – repeat request for duly signed and certified copies of decision records, filed with Supreme Court “Chief Clerk” Idid Melul

זדורוב נ מדינת ישראל (7939/10) וצרניק נ זדורוב ומדינת ישראל (4650/16) – בקשה חוזרת לקבלת העתקים חתומים ומאושרים כדין של כתבי החלטות, שהוגשה ל"מזכירה ראשית" של בית המשפט העליון עידית מלול

https://www.scribd.com/document/329732548/ 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5YzNNZTFQSVkwWk0/view?usp=sharing
[2] 2016-09-08 Response by Supreme Court “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul: a) Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) – refusal to certify Magistrate Lubinsky June 02 Decision denying inspection of paper decision records in State of Israel v Zadorov (502/07) with the reasoning of a “jumble” in the court file; b) Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/16) - perverted certifications of Justice Joubran's decisions on appeal from Lubinsky’s decision; //

תשובת "מזכירה ראשית" של בית המשפט העליון עידית מלול: א) זדורוב נ מדינת ישראל (7939/10) - סירוב לאשר את החלטת הרשם לובינסקי מיום 02 ליוני, המונעת עיון בתיק הנייר מ"י נ זדורוב (502/07) בהנמקת "ערבוביה" בתיק; ב)  צרניק נ רומן זדורוב ומדינת ישראל (4650/16) - אישורים משובשים על החלטות השופט ג'ובראן בערעור מהחלטת הרשם לובינסקי

https://www.scribd.com/document/326544397/
[3] 2016-08-16 RE: Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) and Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/16) – request for duly signed and certified copies of decision records, filed with “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court //

זדורוב נ מדינת ישראל (7939/10) וצרניק נ זדורוב ומדינת ישראל (4650/16) – בקשה לקבלת העתקים חתומים ומאושרים כדין של כתבי החלטות, שהוגשה ל"מזכירה הראשית" של בית המשפט העליון

https://www.scribd.com/document/321439848/

[4] 2016-10-30 Zadorov affair: Correspondence with Zadorov’s trial defense counsel, Part II - Non-existence of valid 2010 judgment records //

פרשת זדורוב: התכתבות עם סניגוריתו של זדורוב, חלק ב’ - על אי הימצאות פסקי דין עשויים כדין משנת 2010

https://www.scribd.com/document/329342460/
[5]  "יש ג'ונגל טוטאלי בבתי המשפט. תעשו הכול כדי לא להגיע אליהם". גלובס

http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001153449