Appendix 30: July 2024 - Joseph Zernik’s notice of fraud, Uri Zernik’s poetic moment, Ben-Ari’s notice of a "joint enterprise"

Appendix 30: July 2024 - Joseph Zernik’s notice of fraud, Uri Zernik’s poetic moment, Ben-Ari’s notice of a "joint enterprise"

https://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2026/07/appendix-30.html 

Index of Appendices and Biosketch, Joseph Zernik, PhD, LLB

https://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2026/07/appeal-for-review-of-rachel-ben-aris.html

Rachel Ben-Ari's competence as General Counsel - Appeal Filed with Prof. Uri Sivan, Technion President, and Prof. Daniel Chamovitz, Chair of VERA and Ben Gurion University President

https://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2026/07/2026-07-17-technion-israel-institute-of.html

... 

images | From Left: Judge Hila Gurevitz, Attorney Rachel Ben-Ari, Attorney Yoav Salomon, Attorney Yair Shiber.

Image |  Attorney Rachel Ben-Ari demonstrating against judicial reform:  "We are here in the name of Democracy, because they want to take it away from us, and that  is the most dangerous thing... They are taking away our judicial independence in various ways...". 

...

On June 5, 2024, the initial pleading was filed in EF 11650-06-24. In it, Salomon and Ben-Ari declared their commitment to execute the Estate Distribution Agreement they had drafted, under which they were appointed Trustees.

I wasn't served with nor notified of the filing.

I discovered it eventually through a routine automated notice from Net HaMishpat about a new court file with my ID number.

On June 13, 2024, I read the initial pleading filed by Attorney Yoav Salomon (~45 years of practice), and it appeared to me to be fraudulent. There was no valid Power of Attorney, no affidavit, no summons, no Probate Order identifying the Heirs... no certificate by the Legal Clerk - approval for filing.

Attorney Yair Shiber was entered in the court file as my Counsel without my knowledge or permission, even though I had an explicit agreement with Shiber that excluded his representation in court.

And then I found out from the court file that on June 6, 2024, Salomon received an email notice from Attorney Yair Shiber, purportedly on my behalf. The notice consisted of 2 words: "We consent." Salomon filed it in court on the evening of June 6, but it was entered only on Sunday, June 9.

That means that the Office of the Clerk permitted Salomon, who was entered as Counsel for Plaintiff, but filed no Power of Attorney by his client, to file a "Consent" on behalf of Defendant, which he received from Attorney Shiber, whom the Office of the Clerk entered as Counsel for Defendant with no Power of Attorney.

Moreover, Ben-Ari and Salomon knew that there was no contact between me and Shiber for the previous couple of months.

On June 16, 2024, I filed 2 short motions; (1) to have Shiber dismissed as my Counsel, (2) to have the false 'Consent' removed from the record.

On June 18, 2024, Salomon filed what I perceived as retaliation - the notice that my recognition as a legal person should be revoked, pursuant to "Cy Pres" in Equity Law.

On June 24, 2024,  Ben-Ari filed a notice, similar to Salomon's ,which Judge Gurevitz entered as a 'Motion'.

On June 25, 2024, Judge Gurevitz entered in the court file that Ben-Ari's motion was "Granted". No decision, no notice, no service.

On July 2, 2024, I filed a notice of fraud in court...

Translation

Translation

The significance of the flaws in the Request for the Appointment of Estate Administrators and issues regarding the authenticity of pleadings and legal proceedings

16. The flawed statement of claims was not submitted by a beginning attorney. The power of attorney for the applicant stands at the head of a large and influential Haifa law firm. Furthermore, the power of attorney for Respondent 2 was actually a partner in this submission, and she also stands at the head of a large and influential Haifa law firm. These two represent two of the most veteran firms in Haifa. One could expect greater care from them in drafting the pleadings and their submission.

17. The obligation to manage pleadings in a way that allows the public to diagnose and verify their authenticity was recognized as a constitutional principle, ex-law, back in Section IV, Part 1 of the U.S. Constitution (ratified on 21.6.1788, enacted on 4.3.1789). Failure of the judicial system, in that it fulfills this duty, should be viewed as a severe violation of the procedural rights of litigants in courts, and human rights (litigation in courts as standard/valid).

18. The central problem with vague and ambiguous authenticity in pleadings is that it creates an opening for abuse through bad-faith "simulated legal proceedings" and/or presenting apparent pleadings with intent to deceive others; their innocent recipients will assume the authority of the writings and comply with their instructions. These phenomena have been well known worldwide for hundreds of years. See – "Texas Penal Code § 32.48 Simulating Legal Process."

19. In the State of Israel, a case of this type gained significant public attention, centered around protocols made by the Honorable Judge R. Alshech from the Tel Aviv District Court in Insolvency Case 1623-00 Bank Hapoalim v. Official Receiver.

20. Respondent 1 documented this phenomenon also in the Family Court in Haifa, during the conduct of the Honorable Judge A. Alon and Attorney A. Tzedaka in Case 25607-03-13 Czerniak v. Attorney General – Request for appointment of an additional guardian for the late Lami Z"L, Rebecca Shami Czerniak [attached as Exhibit – Appendix 1].

21. One of the harsh cases of simulated legal proceedings, documented by Respondent 1, was conducted by a group of male and female judges from the Family Court in Jerusalem, including the Honorable Judge Menachem Cohen, the Honorable Judge Nili Maimon, the Honorable Judge Shlomo Elbaz, and later in the matter of Ms. Yoel Ben Simon. During an attempt to actually review a court file from 2016, the case included 22 files and dozens of decisions/apparent pleadings [attached as Exhibit – Appendix 2].

22. The submission of a statement of claims/pleading in the current case, whose authenticity and validity are vague and ambiguous, should be viewed as an infringement on the procedural rights of the other parties to the proceeding, and Respondent 1 among them.

 

 

... 

Reading it again, it does not seem that subtle. Especially, reminding Judge Hila Gurevitz of Judge Esperanza Alon, her close friend, and Alon's conduct in this affair in 2013. 

On July 3, 2024, I talked by phone with the national Information Center, asking about the unusual filing and opening of the court file on June 5. They had no information and suggested that I send a fax to the Office of the Clerk in Haifa. 

I did so, and the fax was filed in the court file as a new motion by me, #8, with what appeared as a reprimand by Deputy Clerk Keren Peles - "you should address your questions to the National Information Center...".

On July 9, 2024, I filed a response to Deputy Clerk Keren Peles, explaining that I sent the fax following the advise of the national Information Center. The title of the filing was: "The question that is still begging for an answer", referring to the questions surrounding the filing and opening the court file on June 5.

On July 10, 2024,  Salomon filed a response, expressing his displeasure with my attitude. He also seemed to assume that Judge Hila Gurevitz failed to grasp what I was talking about in my July 2, 2024 filing...

One should keep in mind that these papers were filed after the three of them, Ben-Ari, Salomon and Gurevitz had already staged the 1st Round of Revocation of Respondent's Legal Personhood - June 18-June 25, 2024. 

Translation 

Initial Response of the Applicant to the Notice of Respondent 1 Dated 09.07.2024

The Applicant respectfully submits an initial response to Respondent 1's notice dated 09.07.2024, in order to present exchanges of statements between Respondent 1's counsel and Respondent 1, which Respondent 1 chose to conceal from the court.

1. Respondent 1 complains that the Applicant's attorney is not answering him, yet he conceals from the court the notice from the Applicant's attorney to Respondent 1, in which the Applicant's attorney explains why there is no longer room for direct dialogue between him and Respondent 1.

2. On 03.07.2024, Respondent 1 sent an email message to the Applicant and his attorney, in which he took the trouble to explain to them (in section 4 of his attached notice, the highlighted text on a yellow background) that if they have not understood it until now, he accuses them of leading a course of fraud in the Family Court in Haifa.

 

.

 

On July 10, 2024 Judge Hila Gurevitz issued a "Post-it" decision with no docketing number. There were 3 or 4 of them by that time. As noted elsewhere, there is no User's Manual for Net HaMishpat, and no Rules of Court or Regulations of the Office of the Clerk that define the actions in the court files. Regardless, it could be stated that decisions with no process number should be deemed more informal than usual, since they are left out of the informal docket [see Appendix 7]. 

The decision said: "There is no need for further responses." 

  

On July 26, 2024, Plaintiff (Requester) Mr. Uri Zernik contributed a poetic moment: "Space Odyssey."

Translation 

     Space Odyssey

More and more, I am inclined to think that the concern for the inheritance was pre-planned from the start by Mom and Dad. They worried about what would happen if the connection between the sons broke down and we went our separate ways.

So they created an inheritance that is not financial, but an odyssey. And they joined two wonderful friends to us in the figures of Cheli [Ben-Ari - jz] and Yoav [Salomon - jz], whom we received for the family as a gift.

Already now, when a week goes by and I don't receive a letter, I feel a sense of absence. What will happen when we reach the destination? Will we simply part ways? Food for thought.

Uri

        Space Odyssey

More and more, I am inclined to think that the concern for the inheritance was pre-planned from the start by Mom and Dad. They worried about what would happen if the connection between the sons broke down and we went our separate ways.

So they created an inheritance that is not financial, but an odyssey. And they joined two wonderful friends to us in the figures of Cheli [Ben-Ari - jz] and Yoav [Salomon - jz], whom we received for the family as a gift.

Already now, when a week goes by and I don't receive a letter, I feel a sense of absence. What will happen when we reach the destination? Will we simply part ways? Food for thought.

Uri

 

 ... 

On July 29, 2024 I sent an email to Ben-Ari, Salomon and Uri Zernik, titled "The riddle of the relationship between Attorney Yoav Salomon and Attorney Yair Shiber." I asked Salomon et al: I can't figure out a way to place all the facts of recent events in one coherent narrative. Could you please help?  

On July 31, 2024, Ben-Ari answered for Salomon: 

"Let's focus on distribution of the Estate"...

Of interest, in this email message Ben-Ari's noticed me that filing the court action was a "joint enterprise" of Salomon and Ben Ari, regardless of the fact that they decided that his client would be registered as Plaintiff, and hers as Defendant 2.

Translation

I assumed then, and I assume today, 2 years later, almost 3 years since Ben-Ari was appointed Trustee to execute the Estate Distribution Agreement, that there was nothing further from her mind than distributing the Estate and getting the matter over with...