09-11-20 California Court of Appeals, 2nd District

WELCOME TO THE
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

___________________________________________________________________

These pages are written as drats, would be cleaned up at a later time.

The role of the court of Appeals, 2nd District is multi faceted. Not only did it permit the perversion of the law and the conversion of the LA Superior Court into a racket. It also generated the long term infrastructure:

1. Filipescu v. California Housing Finance Agency (App. 2 Dist. 1995) it accepted as legitimate the fact that the LA County eliminated the Book of Judgments, which was the fundamental enabling cause that allowed the LA-JR in its current manifestation.
2. In the published opinion from Darwish, the court opened the way for a wide range of new real estate frauds. It accepted as reasonable "oral modifications of a written real estate contract:". The full impact of that was not yet realized....
3. In a series of other decisions over two decades, the court took what was an essential clear and unambiguous due process procedure - Notice of Entry of Judgment, and entirely ambiguated it, to pervert due process.

The conduct of the court in particular instances, was on the same level as Judge Jacqueline Connor:

1. The Court of Appeal, 2nd District, has double books, as is the standard now... the "docket" that they present online, and an entrely different program in-house.
2. The court of appeals 2nd District keeps inhouse terminals of Sustain - from the LA superior Court, and that way accepts in fact filing that was never noticed to the litigant.. moreover - court records that they never saw, and which are often the opposite of what they thought they saw.
3. The docket does not even have a field for noting the Date of Entry of Judgment - possibly the single most important piece of data in an appeal.
4. The conduct of the Court of Appeals in the case of Darwish cannot be explained within the real of the law, with two judgments, 3 appeasl, one published opinion, from a case that was a protracted criminal affair in its essence.
5. In my case, again- to cater to Sheppard Mullin, the court of Appeal, 2nd District, took an appeal from NOTHING. No order or judgment was listed as the basis for the appeal. But it passed review of the Pre docket, and was listed in the docket of that court. They had no credibility as a court at all.
6. In a series of small motions in my case it was clearly demonstrated that the court of appeals was dishonest, and I dropped my appeal: They refused to list the parties to the appeal, even after motion for reconsideration. The reason was obvious - to mislead, so that you do not write any claims in your brief against parties that were not listed. But immediately after I dropped my appeal - the listed them all. i have of course time stamped printouts before and after.
7. They tried to coerce me to engage in an appeal from a Judgment that was not entered.
8. They tried to engage me in appeal from an order that was fraud - They issued an order that stated: Defendant's true remedy is in appeal from the order appointing receiver. That order was and is fraud on its face.
9. The Court of Appeals, Second District allowed the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to file as Record on Appeal, the online case summary, which the court defines as "not a court record" in lieu of Register of Actions, which is likely to be standard procedure. After I filed an objection, the Court of Appeal did not rule on my objection, instead, they issued an order to the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to withdraw his filing, and then they issued a ruling of "Moot" on my objection. Furthermore, they never asked the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to file the true Register of Actions. When I filed it, with a request for judicial notice - they denied the request.

In short - they are an essential part of the criminal network.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.