09-11-20 Rampart scandal - through the looking-glass.

- - - - - - - -- - - - -

[wikipedia]
Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There (1871) is a work of children's literature by Lewis Carroll (Charles Lutwidge Dodgson), generally categorized asliterary nonsense.[citation needed] It is the sequel to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (1865). Although it makes no reference to the events in the earlier book, the themes and settings of Through the Looking-Glass make it a kind of mirror image of Wonderland: the first book begins outdoors, in the warm month of May, (May 4),[1] uses frequent changes in size as a plot device, and draws on the imagery of playing cards; the second opens indoors on a snowy, wintry night exactly six months later, on November 4 (the day beforeGuy Fawkes Night),[2] uses frequent changes in time and spatial directions as a plot device, and draws on the imagery of chess. In it, there are many mirror themes, including opposites, time running backwards, and so on.

Jacqueline Connor

Central Figure in both affairs.

Extension:

• One way to show the direct extension- Judge Jacqueline Connor is again in the center of a racketeering scandal.
• This time, like last time, there are issues of the courts and police.
• In the original Rampart scandal it was claimed that police was corrupt, and the judges, like Judge Connor - were "duped".
• In this case, there were no police in the court room.

Mirror Image

• This case showed that the true criminal initiaive originated from the court - Judge Jacqueline Connor.
• Police were just playing assist, but very fastidiously

Sheriff Department:

• I take it back- there were Sheriff Deputies... after the first time I appeared in court, in January 2007, armed sheriff's were escorting me anywhere in the court, they would wait outside the men's room. I was told that Judge Connor issued the order. However, I was impressed by the honesty and openness of the sheriff deputies. After a few weeks they told me it was nonsense, and they told me also that it never happened as far back as they could remember (one said 14 years).
• In one case I was escorted by an armed sheriff with a German Sheppard.
• When I asked the court for access to inspect and to copy the order - I was not allowed... secret orders.
• It went on for about a year.
• I knew it was all fraud, and never cooperated. Therefore at the end - they had to use threat of force - unlawful but credible - Judge John Segal issued for Atty David Pasternak a false order to have the sheriff evict me from my own home. It was invalid, but I knew that they could have the sheriff act on it... That is exactly the story of Richard Fine.

Police

• I believe that my case was the exception, and Barbara Darwish was more of the standard, she was deceived for 8 years in the courts, (1998-2006), but when I met her in February 2009, she never suspected the judges. She knew that Plaintiff was engaged in real estate fraud on her, and likewise his attorney - Richard Green - Green and Marker - but she thought that her mistake was that she did not put more money into attorneys upfront. I figured out the fraud more or less in full a year before it was consummated, but Beverly Hills Police was involved in the scheme, and already then they were working hard to make sure that the crimianls would be successful. They would not allow me to file a complaint, no matter what .
• I finally came late at night on the weekend, and filed the complaint.
• When that detectives came back on Monday, they were outraged, they treated me as if I were a criminal... while in fact they were.
• I insisted on engaging them in thorough review, including Michaela- since retired. They refused to accept it as a crime compaint, and isisted that it was only a Business Dispute.
• Steve Seeger- Detective, and David Snowdon - Chief - were distinctive in their corruption.
• At that time I still did not have Fraud Expert letters. But the fraud was obvious. Only Beverly Hills Police could not see it. So what if the signatures were forged... Let's see, would you say it is a crime if you sign for your wife a check at the garage?
• Here it was financial and banking records, and no spousal relationship involved at all...
• One I got the fraud expert letters - Detective Steve Seeger just sent a letter that they have not changed heir position.
• The fraud expert, was a veteran FBI agent- possibly the most decorated alive, and he recommended "immediate investigation" - not in Beverly Hills.

La Verne

• In the last couple of months, I was trying to file a crime report against David Pasternak in La Verne.
• The jury is still out. I got a crime report, but it could look better.

Banking Regulators:

• My case was more complex than the Barbara Darwish case, since Countrywide was involved. However, that gave me the opportunity to seek Equal Protection through a variety of other law enforcement agencies, which are at the center of attention today. In a way i conducted an anonymous survey of the U.S Banking Regulation system...
• Trade Commision - is probably the most corrupt.
• Thrift Supervision - lags behind
• I issued Freedom of Informatin Act requests on these two agencies in 2007 - I could never retrieve my own complaints from a few months earlier. There were a couple of letters that indicated that there was a complaint.
• The standard procedure was probably to destroy complaints against Countrywide.
• SEC - similar- but more sophisticated.
• Countrywide, and later - Bank of America Corporation have been engaged in racketeering at the LA Superior Court for 2.5 years. It continues to this date - under the supervision of Sandor Samuels - through false appearances by Bryan Cave, LLP.
• The U.S. Government is trying to tell the world that Banking Regulation now works... Not really... Bank of America can continue racketeering in broad day light in the court , calling itself Pinocchio, or whatever, no banking regulator would do anything against Bank of America.
• My theory is that Bank of America inherited from Countrywide following the merger the Implied Judicial Immunity. That is what you get when you collude in racketeering with the Judiciary.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.