09-12-18 Multi-layered fraud on the falsely imprisoned Attorney Richard Fine and on the people - or why Alex Kozinski must resign!

   
Richard Fine _ _  _ _ _Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons)
The ongoing false imprisonments in Los Angeles California are Absolute Corruption!

Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:34:32 -0800
To: "Ron "
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Multi-layered fraud on the falsely imprisoned Attorney Richard Fine and on the people - or why Alex Kozinski must resign!

December 18, 2009
Ronald Gottschalk, Esq
By email 
Dear Atty Gottschalk:
In a previous December 18, 2009 message, copied below, I requested that you cease and desist fraud against Richard Fine and on the people.   In the phone conversation that preceded that notice, you repeatedly stated that I was not an attorney (which of course was true and correct), that you were an attorney (I was informed and believed it was true and correct as well), and that I was clueless (which for all I knew, could be true and correct).  Therefore, I requested that you provide, "in your capacity as an attorney, honest, valid, and effectual copies of records, listed... in (a), and (b)." Such request pertained to:

a) Conviction of Richard Fine on Contempt

b) Minute Order that you referred to, whichever it was.

In response you forwarded to me the records linked below. [1] 
Attorney Gottschalk, I must repeat my kindly request that you cease and desist your collusion in the fraud on Attorney Richard Fine and the people, by false and deliberately misleading representations that there was any record that conformed with the fundamentals of the law, to substantiate the false confinement of Richard Fine.  The records that you forwarded to me were and are fraud for numerous reasons, including but not limited to the following:
1) Pages 3-16 of this record were titled: Judgment and Order of Contempt re: Richard I Fine.
This record had to be deemed fraud, for reasons including, but not limited to the following:

a. It was stamped FILED at the Superior Court on March 4, 2009 on page 3, while it was signed by Judge David Yaffe with the date of March 24, 2009 on page 16.

b. There was no authentication for this record at all.

c. The record on page 3 stated that it was part of a case of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, captioned Marina Strand Colony II Homeowners Association v County of Los Angeles (BS109420). There never was, there is not, and there never will be such a caption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.

d. The record on page 3 stated that it was  "Assigned to Hon David P Yaffe, Dept 86". No such case was ever assigned to a David P Yaffe.

e. The file name which you forwarded this record under, designated it "Dkt 204", implying that this record was part of an honest, valid and effectual docket.  In fact, the Superior Court denied multiple requests to access the Register of Actions (California docket) in this case, out of compliance with US Supreme Court Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978).

f. Therefore, the records that you provided also entirely lacked any foundation to accept them as honest, valid, and effectual "court documents", as stated in your message.

g. Such record was purportedly filed by Attorney Kevin McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - a petition for a writ of habeas corpus at the US District Court, Los Angeles, on behalf of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and Judge David Yaffe, as part of a purported May 1, 2009 "Response".  However, Attorney Kevin McCormick failed to file certifications that were required to establish his status as Counsel of Record, there was no record signed by his clients in his filing, his declaration was by an incompetent fact witness, and he had no authority to file such records on behalf of the Superior Court and Judge David Yaffe.

h. Attorney Kevin McCormick, Judge David Yaffe, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy, and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, were all notified of the fraud in their conduct, which resulted in the ongoing false imprisonment of Richard Fine,  but failed to initiate corrective actions.

h. Magistrate Carla Woehrle issued a June 12, 2009 Report and Recommendation [2] for denial with prejudice of the Richard Fine Petition, based on such records.  Upon review of the facts in this matter, a reasonable person would conclude that the Carla Woehrle 25 page, footnoted R & R was an elaborate fraud. Suffice was to note that: (i) It failed to mention by name the caption of the case it reviewed, (ii) It failed to mention the refusal of the Superior Court to produce the Register of Actions, (iii) It failed to ever mention the word "warrant", and (iv) It was served upon Richard Fine with no authentication at all - I was informed and believed.

i. For the very same reasons, a reasonable person would conclude that the June 29, 2009 Judgment by Judge John Walter was yet another layer of the fraud on Richard Fine and on the people. [3] Please also notice that: (i) The purported Judgment was served on Richard Fine with no authentication at all, (ii) The related transactions report never listed the judgment as related to the petition [4], (iv) The petition was not listed as terminated, (v) US District Court LA denied access to Docket Activity Repot, (vi) US District Court LA and Clerk Terry Nafisi - denied access to NEFs in this case.

j. For the same reasons, a reasonable person would conclude that the June 30, 2009 Judgment by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, and Circuit Judges Richard Paez and Richard Tallman, was yet another layer of fraud on Richard Fine and the people. [5] Please also notice that: (i) Such Order was unsigned, (ii) Such Order was served on Richard fine and on me with no authentication at all, and (iii) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit and its Clerk Molly C Dyer - denied access to the NEFs.

In sum: The judges and clerks marked in red above engaged in multi-layered Kozinski Fraud [6] on Richard Fine and on the people.

I would be grateful if you could provide:

a. Copy of the Register of Actions (California docket) in this case;

b. Minute Order that you previously referred to, and

c. Any other evidence that a case of the caption and number listed above was an honest, valid and effectual case of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.

2) Page 2.  My reading of it was of an invalid, ineffectual, false and deliberately misleading Remand Order. However, the office of Sheriff Lee Baca insisted that it was a Removal Order. 

I would be grateful for could provide a reasonable explanation, in your capacity as an attorney, regarding the nature of the record in page 2.

In conclusion, I would be grateful for your response on the issues, but must again request that you cease and desist your collusion in fraud on Richard Fine and on the People in propagating false and deliberately misleading court records and legal information.
Truly,

Joseph Zernik
P.S. I would be grateful if you could provide a good pic of yours for my blog at: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ where you could find some other great patriotic pics.
__________________
Linked Records:
[1] Records which were forwarded by Attorney Ron Gottschalk on December 18, 2009, and were purported to be court records for conviction of Richard Fine.
http://inproperinla.com/09-12-18-from-gottschalk-23721248-marina-strand-case-dkt-204-judgment-and-order-of-contempt-signed-3-24-09.pdf
[2] June 12, 2009 Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Carla Woehrle.
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-la-fine-v-la-county-sheriff-doc-26-mj-woehrle-amended-r-n-r-09-06-12.pdf
[3] June 29,  2009 Judgment by Judge John Walter
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-la-fine-v-la-county-sheriff-doc-30-filed-09-06-29-judge-walter-judgment-dismiss-habeas-corpus.pdf
[4] July 2,  2009 Related Transactions report.
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-la-fine-v-la-county-sheriff-09-07-02-rekated%20transactions.pdf
[5] June 30, 2009 Order by Chief Judge Kozinski, and Circuit Judge Richard Paez and Richard Tallman
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-app-ct-9th-fine-v-sheriff-of-la-09-71692-doc-04-order-denying-s.pdf
[6] What are Kozinski Fraud and Kozinski Culture?
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2009/12/09-12-01-what-is-kozinski-fraud.html

Ron Gottschalk's writing

X-McAfee-Timeout-Protection: 1
X-MSK: 2BIG
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=3RpGoAhz56AA:10 a=j70kkp8B3MnGH4JLjcAA:9 a=EVLjv7qIJXYkyB9QkCQA:7 a=bTHepP4bWodohl2kbgk0z-rmD0kA:4 a=n3BslyFRqc0A:10 a=bhkaYMs-ANYA:10
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 75.84.222.91
From: "Ron "
To: "'joseph zernik'" ,
        
Subject: These are the court documents re Richard Fine's civil contempt conviction- CIVIL contempt & not criminal contempt.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:09:51 -0800
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Acp/yjQBYmI8RRSeTdWnFKgk/SrvMw==
X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0;
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;

 23721248-Marina-Strand-case-Dkt-204-Judgment-and-Order-of-Contempt-signed-3-24-09.pdf
Joseph Zernik's writing

Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:02:18 -0800
To: "Ron "
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Please cease and desist participating in fraud against Richard Fine, regardless of your personal problems.
Cc: lawsters@googlegroups.com

Ronald Gottschalk, Esq
By email

Dear Mr Gottschalk:
In our phone conversation today you stated, that in your capacity as an attorney, you were informing me that:

1. Richard Fine was never arrested.
2. There was no need for a Warrant to arrest Richard Fine, since it involved contempt.
3. Richard Fine was convicted of contempt.
4. There was a Minute Order to that effect.

In response, I challenged each and every one of your statements (1) through (4), above, as false and deliberately misleading. Furthermore, I asked you to provide honest, valid, and effectual court records of:

a) Conviction of Richard Fine on Contempt

b) Minute Order that you referred to, whichever it was.

In reply you only repeated your threats against me.  I considered each and every one of your statements above as evidence of your participating in the fraud against Richard Fine.  Regardless of your compromised conditions,  I request that you please cease and desist spreading false and deliberately misleading information regarding Richard Fine. 
The true and correct facts in the matter were:

1. Richard Fine was arrested with no warrant.
2. Richard Fine was never convicted of contempt.
3. For such reasons Richard Fine was held in a hospital room, with no medical reason whatsoever, off the count of inmates in the jail, and off the record of booked inmates.

In case you disagree, I hope that you would provide, in your capacity as an attorney, honest, valid, and effectual copies of records, listed above in (a), and (b). It would have been simple, it would have been easy, if such records had ever existed.
Truly,

Joseph Zernik
P.S. Please confirm that the picture below was of you, so that I may post it on my web site as such. I would be grateful for a better pic.

III. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.

IV. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.