10-01-04 Requesting clarifications from Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the United States Court - whether docket of Zernik v Connor et al was an honest, valid, and effectual docket of the court...

Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:01:23 -0800
To:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: 10-01-04 RE: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550);The favor of a response within 10 business days was requested.

Dr Z

Joseph Zernik, PhD

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 801 998-0917; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net                                 

Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs

10-01-04        RE: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550)

Requesting clarification re authority of persons who entered transactions in the docket.

The favor of a response within 10 business days was requested.

TO Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court, United States Court, Central District of California, 312 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, by certified mail, and  by email to [ ].

Dear Clerk Nakisi:

Happy New Year, and thanks again to Ms Dawn Bullock for her help and her patience during my visit to the Clerks Records Department on December 29, 2009.   Review of the docket and the NEFs demonstrated that a number of persons executed transactions in the docket of the above referenced case.  However, none of them was identified by name. Moreover, nowhere was any statement found to the effect that such transactions, and such docket were in fact executed by Deputy Clerks, by authority of Clerk of the Court, Terry Nafisi. 

I therefore request the following clarifications through statements on the record by Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court:
1)      That dt did/did not refer to Ms Donna Thomas.
2)      That Ms Donna Thomas was/was not authorized as a Deputy Clerk during the period covered by the docket of Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550).  In case Ms Thomas was indeed authorized, please provide the date of her appointment as Deputy Clerk.
3)      That transactions by Ms Donna Thomas in the docket of Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) were/were not executed by authority of Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court.
4)      That the refusal on March 5-7, 2008, by Chris Sawyer, Pro Se Clerk, to issue summonses prepared by Plaintiff in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550), and his issuance instead of summonses prepared by Chris Sawyer, Pro Se Clerk, himself, which were docketed under the complaint (Dkt #1), and notated in the unnumbered second docket slot, was/was not by authority of Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court.
5)      That all other transactions in this docket, which were executed by court personnel, were/were not executed by authority of Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court.
6)      That the docket of Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550), as displayed  in PACER was/was not deemed by the Clerk of the Court an honest, valid, and effectual docket of the United States Court, pursuant to United States law.
Respectfully,
Dated: January 04, 2010         
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California                     Joseph H Zernik                                                                        

                                                                                      

                                                                 By: ______________
                                                                 JOSEPH H ZERNIK
                                                                 PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750
                                                                 Fax: 801.998.0917
                                                                 Email
Attached: Digitally signed copy of this letter.