10-01-04 Why on earth should anybody care at all about Zernik v Connor et al?

Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:33:13 -0800
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik  

Subject: Clarifications for Mr Harrington: RE: 10-01-04 RE: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550);

Dear Mr Harrington:

I was sorry to find you irritated.  The reason that I thought that others might be interested were the following:
a) In Zernik v Connor et all, defendants included 10 judges of the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, and Countrywide's Angelo Mozilo and Sandor Samuels, as well as others.  They were alleged to have involved violations of the law, amounting to racketeering.
b) The case at the United States Court was unique, in that I have recently managed to gain access to records that were denied elsewhere, and which provided definitive proof of the large scale fraud in operation of PACER & CM ECF.  I believed that anybody who had business before any United States Court should be interested in the details of such alleged fraud.
In short -
a) The allegation was that the standard approach of United States Courts and United States Courts of Appeals in response to cases involving judicial corruption - was to employ fraud in PACER & CM/ECF, of the type that was dubbed "Kozinski Fraud", as perpetrated on the falsely jailed Richard Fine, and which was recently also demonstrated in part by Scott Huminski as employed by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
b) Such fraud was directly tied to denial of access to court records, in apparent violation of First Amendment and Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978) rights in courts across the United States.

For all the reasons listed above, I thought some people might be interested in the subject.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Patriotic pics of sharon stone, beyonce knowles, and charlize theron,
To be added soon- deep house music!

 At 12:26 04/01/2010, you wrote:

Why on earth am I getting a blow-by-blow on some obscure case, Zernik v. Connor, from a Google group that I was surreptitiously subscribed to (without my consent)?  Would everyone here like to receive a blow-by-blow on my ten year Marriage of Harrington case and its progeny from the Colorado state courts?

If it is your attempt to promulgate useful information and heighten public awareness, let me be the first to inform you that your efforts are an abysmal failure.  If you want to be effective, give us the highlights once a month with a summary or give us a concise two sentence caption with a link, should we want to learn more.

Seriously, my Inbox has been swelling to the point of obscurity and absurdity with the deluge of prolix and sometimes incoherent rambling from certain members of this purported group.

Please remove me from this list.

. . . with kind regards,

Sean L. Harrington
http://knowyourcourts.com

---