10-02-03 Fact-based discussion: Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), US Judge John Walter, US Magistrate Carla Woehrle, California Judge David Yaffe, and the racketeering courts of California and the United States.

  

Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:33:06 -0800
To: "US and California agencies, law school faculty, NGOs, and others"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: FACT BASED DISCUSSION: Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), US Judge John Walter, US Magistrate Woehrle, California Judge David Yaffe, California Judge Charles McCoy, and the ongoing false hospitalization of Richard Fine.

FYI, any comment on the matter at hand would be greatly appreciated.
Enjoy your readings of fraudulent records of the fraudulent court systems of California and the United States!
 --jz

CC:
United States Department of Justice Inspector General, Glenn A Fine, as an addendum to complaint against Kenneth Kaiser - FBI Assistant Director, Criminal Investigations, and Kenneth Melson - Director, US Attorney General Office, RE:
1) Refusal to protect the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of the 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County, California, and
2) Fraud in responses to inquiries by United States Congress on the matter, by Senator Dianne Feinstein and Congresswoman Diane Watson.

Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:11:01 -0800
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: FACT BASED DISCUSSION: Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), US Judge John Walter, US Magistrate Woehrle, California Judge David Yaffe, California Judge Charles McCoy, and the ongoing false hospitalization of Richard Fine.

Dear All:

Surprisingly, not a single person refuted the set of facts, provided below, regarding the false hospitalization of Richard Fine.  The writing below included claims of false appearances by counsel, who was not counsel of record, Kevin McCormick, on behalf of Judge David Yaffe and the Los Angeles Superior Court, the filing of false records by such counsel, and deliberate conduct through collusion of Kevin McCormick, California Judge David Yaffe, California Judge Charles McCoy, US Magistrate Carla Woehrle, US Judge John Walter, and others, in order to perpetrate the false hospitalization of Richard Fine.

One would expect such heavy duty claims - that the Los Angeles Superior Court and the US District Court, Los Angeles, colluded in perversion and obstruction of justice, in what should be deemed racketeering, would raise a whole set of objections.  In particular, such claims should be noted in the fact that they contradict any version of reality reported by media to this date in re: False hospitalization of Richard Fine.

As noted below, all supporting records were posted online for review by those interested.

Enjoy your readings of fraudulent records of the fraudulent court systems of California and the United States!

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!


Subject: Re: FACT BASED DISCUSSION: Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914),  Judge John Walter, Magistrate Woehrle, and the ongoing false hospitalization of Richard Fine.

Dear All: 

For those interested in fact-based discussion regarding the caption listed above, and alleged Willful Misconduct by Magistrate Carla Woehrle and US Judge John Walter, as well as alleged criminality by Attorney Kevin McCormick, Judge David Yaffe, Judge Charles McCoy (Presiding Judge, LA Superior Court) and John Clarke (Clerk of the Court, LA Superior Court):

Most records in the caption can be found at: http://inproperinla.com/
Use the "Find" function in your browser (typically "Control F") and query for "fine_v_sheriff" [underlines, but no quotes].
You would get to the section of the archive holding the relevant papers.

Enjoy your readings in the fraudulent court system of the United States! 

FALSE APPEARANCE BY COUNSEL, WHO WAS NOT COUNSEL OF RECORD IN FINE V SHERIFF 

In Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), the NON-CASE of Richard Fine's habeas corpus petition, the following facts should be noted: 

1. Sheriff was rightly named as Respondent, since he is holding Richard Fine. 
2. Sheriff refused to respond [because Fine is held with no legal foundation]. 
3. US Magistrate Carla Woehrle refused to release Fine, who filed ex parte application for his own release following refusal of the Sheriff to respond on a Habeas Corpus petition. 
4. Eventually, Judge David Yaffe and the LA Superior Court purported to respond in lieu of the Sheriff, albeit - they were never named Respondents by Richard Fine. They were not the ones holding him. 
5. Purported appearances for Judge David Yaffe and the LA Superior Court were by Attorney Kevin McCormick from Ventura County, a relatively young attorney, of no significance, but relatively far away... 
6. Kevin McCormick failed to file the required certifications for appearance as Counsel of Record for David Yaffe and the LA Superior Court.  Regardless, Magistrate Carla Woehrle allowed him to appear. 
7. Kevin McCormick filed briefs with Declaration by Counsel - himself, not a competent fact witness in this case at all.  No declaration by any of his clients was ever filed. 
8. Kevin McCormick filed false records as evidence, with no authentication at all. 
9.  None of the records McCormick filed originated from his purported clients.   
10. Attorney Kevin McCormick, Judge Yaffe, and the LA Superior Court refused to respond to repeated inquiries to ascertain that McCormick was appearing as Counsel of Record for such clients under the respective caption. 

In short - there was no evidence in the court file that Attorney Kevin McCormick had ever communicated with Judge David Yaffe or the LA Superior Court. 

Needless to say, no order or judgment were ever entered in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - no valid NEF was ever served on Richard Fine with any of the false court papers that were represented as orders and judgment. 

Such NON CASE for the habeas corpus of Richard Fine, and such appearances by false counsel were used to affect deprivation of Liberty. 

Fraud in the Courts 101 

ESSENTIALS OF A NON-CASE: 

NON-CASES - the cornerstone of judicial corruption in the United States today, in both state and US courts, are surely another subject that is never taught in law school. Therefore, let me offer you the overview:  

1. Commencing records must be defective 
2. Termination records must be defective as well. 
3. No valid commencement of jurisdiction may be entered  - no valid assignment to a judge, no valid reference, etc. 
4. No valid dispositive order on jurisdiction may be entered - no valid order on disqualification, either denying or granting it.   
5. All executable orders that may be issued by the court during the course of a NON-CASE must be defective, and none must be entered, which explains the plethora of unsigned orders and judgments in the US today. 
6. No court fee may be collected, where any mention is explicitly provided that such fees were for court services. 
7. Public access to court records that would provide definitive evidence of the racketeering by the judges must be denied - today - often achieved through implementation of fraudulent case management systems at the courts.