IN PRO PER IN L.A. // בעצמו, בלתי מיוצג: 2016-12-05 When Bank Leumi CEO Aminoach goes to the Tel-Aviv court

When Bank Leumi CEO Aminoach goes to the Tel-Aviv court - one should suspect fraud by the judge...
Rakefet Russak Aminoach went to court yesterday, asking for a restraining order against Amnon Porat, an elderly, sickly victim of robbery by the bank. Porat daily stands in the street, praying for absolution of Russak Aminoach's robbery sins... As usual, in cases pertaining to banks and social protest, one should suspect fraud by the judges of the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court. While Judge Shlomit by Yitzhak's conduct on the bench remains dubious, the action outside the court room was unforgettable! Until we get some of the criminal judges imprisoned, it ain't going to change...
Read the complete post: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/12/2016-12-05-bank-hapoalim-ceo-aminoach.html

Figures: Amonon Porat (with friend) protest against Bank Leumi and Russak-Aminoach; Bank Leumi CEO Rakefet Russak Aminoach; anti judicial corruption protest, Judge Shlomit ben Yitzhak.

Figure: Activists protest against Bank Leumi and Russak-Aminoach on the hearing date.

____

מה הלך בחניון... וויי וויי רקפת... אין לך עוד הרבה זמן עם ההונאות האלה.
https://www.facebook.com/moshe.menkin/posts/10154782337289246?hc_location=ufi

רקפת רוסק עמינח לא יכולה לצאת מחניון בית המשפט
הסבר למקרה :
פוסט של עורך הדין Barak Cohen המייצג את אמנון פורת בן 65 שנתבע על ידי מנכ"ל בנק לאומי https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10207748571660798&set=a.1182387688375.2024479.1488709887&type=3&theater
סרטון עם עורך הדין Barak Cohen ברק כהן https://www.facebook.com/sgavivi/videos/1328663543830855/

24,299 Views

Moshe Menkin added a new video.

21 hrs ·

OccupyTLV, December 05 - request to inspect was filed today with Judge Shlomit Ben Yitzhak in Rakefet Russak Aminoach v Amonon Porat (64434-11-15) in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court. The request raises the concern of Fraud Upon the Court, which has become common in cases pertaining to the banks and social protest - particularly on the background of the current legal culture in the State of Israel, described by "senior legal scholars" as "a total jungle in the courts", where judges ignore both the facts and the law...
The request provides several examples of Fraud Upon the Court by judges in cases pertaining to banks and/or social protest. One notable example is an infamous Bank HaPoalim court file, where Judge Varda Alshech perpetrated fraud, known as the "Fabricated Protocols" scandal. As described below, Net-HaMishpat (case management and public access system of the court) today shows two copies of fabricated Judge Einat Ravid decision on Joseph Zernik's request (from 2016), in place of the records of Judge Varda Alshech "Fabricated Protocols" (from 2011).
Such finding alone, demonstrates the invalidity, lack of integrity, and general fraud in development and operation of Net-HaMishpat system. It also demonstrates the "total jungle" in the courts, where judges have no understanding and/or competence in honest administration of court records and/or have no shame left in perpetrating fraud and falsification of court records...
The public may not fully understand the technical details underlying corruption of the courts. However, the public like "senior legal scholar" fully understands that the courts are corrupt. The response can be viewed in what took place yesterday in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, the tip of which is shown in the video, linked below (which quickly generated over 20,000 views).

Regulations of the Courts-Inspection of Court Files (2003), Form 2; (Regulation 4(c))
Request to Inspect Court File

1.     Requester’s Details
    Full Name:     Joseph Zernik, PhD
    ID:
    Address:     PO Box 33407, Tel-Aviv
    Phone:     None

2.     Court File Details
    Court and File #
    64434-11-16 in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court,
    Parties:
    Rakefet Russak-Aminoach v Amnon Porat
    Records sought for inspection:
a) Lawfully made and entered publication prohibition decree (sealing order), or any other judicial record, which is the legal foundation for hiding the data regarding instant court file from the Index of All Cases.
In case the requested records do not exist in instant court file, Judge Shlomit Ben Yitzhak is asked to explicitly state so in her decision on the Request to Inspect.

Figure 1: Rakefet Russak-Aminoach v Amnon Porat (64434-11-16) – attempt to access instant court file in the Index of All Cases on December 03, 2016. The notice says: “The user is not permitted to view this court file”.
____
The notice in Net-HaMishpat, as usual, fails to refer to any lawful prohibition of publication, or sealing, and fails to provide the legal foundation for denial of public access to the fundamental data in the Index of All Cases.
b) Systematic review shows that judges in Israel have usurped the authority to deny public access to data, including the Index of All Cases, with no foundation in the law. Such conduct is routinely observed from the magistrate courts to the Supreme Court.
Notable examples include:
(1) Zion Keynan v Barak Cohen (11466-01-16) in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Zion Keynan v Barak Cohen (11466-01-16) in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court – attempt to access the Index data regarding the court file on December 05, 2016. The notice says: “The user is not permitted to view this court file”.
____
In this court file, Judge Efrat Busani declared from the bench that the court file was not lawfully sealed, but she did not know how to operate Net-HaMishpat system to prevent the denial of public access to the data. Such declaration and such conduct by Judge Busani should be deemed a ridiculous fraud.
(2) Bank HaPoalim LTD v State Receiver et al (1623-00) in the Tel-Aviv District Court (Figure 3-4).

Figure 3: Bank HaPoalim LTD v State Receiver et al (1623-00) in the Tel-Aviv District Court – attempt to access the court file on December 05, 2016: Under the “Decisions Docket”, two (2) entries appear for September 12, 2011, protocols, which became notorious in Judge Varda Alshech “Fabricated Protocols” scandal.

____
This court file got notorious due to the fraud by Judge Varda Alshech in the “Fabricated Protocols” scandal. The records were published a long time ago, and it is obvious that they are not lawfully sealed. And yet, public access is unlawfully denied, and such circumstances have not been corrected, regardless of repeat filings with the Court. Instead, the court file was further perverted by the linkage of Judge Einat Ravid 2016 decisions on Joseph Zernik’s requests to inspect under the entries for Judge Varda Alshech’s 2011 protocols.
c) Denial of public access to the records and to fundamental court file data is often related to fraud in the judicial records and the judicial process as well - conduct of simulated court process and the publication of simulated court records.
A striking recent example:
(1) State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court
Fraud, relative to the conduct of sham November 28, 2016 “Sentencing” hearing and the publication of sham “Sentencing” record by Judge Daniel Beeri, is outlined in the attached publication:

Whistle-blower Rafi Rotem and crooked Judge Daniel Beeri: Was "sentencing" hearing reality, or a dream? [2]

d) Such phenomena in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court are particularly notable in court files pertaining to the banks and social protest. Therefore, and in view of the subject matter of instant court tile, there is obvious concern that in instant court file Judge Shlomit Ben Yitzhak unlawfully hides data from the public, and possibly also perpetrates Fraud Upon the Court in conduct of the judicial process and in the judicial records.
Past experience shows that Israeli attorneys in general, and Attorney Barak Cohen in particular, accept such conduct by judges without any protest, possibly as part of prevailing culture in the Israeli courts, which has been recenlty described by “senior legal scholars” as “a total jungle in the courts”. [3] In contrast, such conduct should be deemed in violation of fundamental Human Rights – the right for Fair Public Hearing and the right for Due Process.
According to hearsay, instant court file originates in claims by Rakefet Russak-Aminoach, Bank Leumi President and CEO, that her 4 yo daughter heard from another 4 yo girl that the latter found a “sticker”, related to the Defendant. The Defendant, an elderly person who suffers from a serious heart disease, claims that he is one of the numerous victims of fraud on debtors by Bank Leumi. He claims that he holds daily prayers for absolution of her sins of robbery in front of her office, but has nothing to do with her children or their schools. And yet, it is obvious that immediately with the filing of the Complaint, the court file was hidden from the public, including court file number and parties’ names. Therefore, there is public interest in information regarding existence (or non-existence) of lawful sealing in instant court file, and its effective date.

4.     Any direct or indirect relationship of the Requester to instant court file
The Requester has no relationship to instant court file. The Requester engages in academic research and academic publication and filing of reports with the UN regarding fraud in the Israeli courts. Special emphasis is given in such studies and reports to the use of fraudulent IT systems for such purposes.

Date: December 05, 2016            __________________
                            Joseph Zernik

IN PRO PER IN L.A. // בעצמו, בלתי מיוצג

Monday, December 5, 2016

2016-12-05 When Bank Leumi CEO Aminoach goes to the Tel-Aviv court - one should suspect fraud by the judge...

No comments:

Post a Comment