10-03-05 Request for equal protection by California Attorney General Jerry Brown // Solicitud de igual protección de Fiscal General de California Jerry Brown

Jerry Brown
California Attorney General and Gubernatorial Aspirant

Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:34:37 -0800
To: "Attention AG Brown "
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Repeat request for assistance in re: Widespread corruption of the local justice system, and alleged serious, large-scale violations of Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights in Los Angeles County, California

March 5, 2010

Jerry Brown, Attorney General
California Department of Justice
By Email.

RE: Repeat request for assistance in re: Widespread corruption of the local justice system, and alleged serious, large-scale violations of Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights in Los Angeles County, California

Dear Attorney General Brown:

I am writing again to request that you take notice of widespread corruption of the local justice system, including but not limited to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and alleged serious large-scale false arrests, false jailing, and false hospitalizations of political dissidents by the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles, California.

Repeat request for issuance of Complaint numbers pertaining to long standing abusive practices of the Sheriff's Department pertaining to arrests, jailing, and coerced hospitalizations, addressed to Stephanie Maxberry, Ombudsman of the County of Los Angeles, is copied below.  So far, it was not even possible to obtain Complaint numbers for such serious Complaints.

Such Complaints are claimed to be a direct extension of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000), where large-scale false imprisonments were documented, estimated at 10,000-20,000 Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) [1]  To this date, no official report was issued by the LAPD for the 2-year, 200 investigator probe of the scandal. The vast majority of the Rampart-FIPs remained falsely imprisoned to this date, due to the fully documented concerted resistance to their release by the local justice system - police, prosecutors, and judges of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles , which remained inexplicable within the real of the law. [2]

Widespread corruption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles was also previously confirmed through the February 20, 2009 signing into law of dubious legal validity providing "retroactive immunities" for all judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, who took "not permitted" payments of ~$45,000 per judge, per year, for over a decade, while it became practically impossible to win a case in court against the payer. [3]  Request was previously filed with your office to inquire whether you had made any pronouncement regarding such "not permitted" payments, continuing to this date, and regarding the respective law, providing "retroactive immunities", which appeared contrary to the California Constitution, which prohibited retroactive laws.  To this date, your failed to provide any response on these matters.

The February 19, 2010 response letter from your office, [4] regarding an earlier request for Equal Protection under the Law of the Human Constitutional and Civil Rights of the 10 million residents of the County of Los Angeles, suggested that such requests and complaints be addressed to the local justice system.  Such response by your office was unreasonable, and suggested to the victims of serious abuses a futile course of actions in seeking remedies. 

The inability of the local justice system of the County of Los Angeles to address its own corruption was continuously demonstrated for over a decade. The deliberate futility was of the course of action suggested in your February 19, 2010 letter, was best demonstrated when the Rampart scandal (1998-2000), the largest corruption scandal of local justice system in the history of the United States, was left by the California and the US Justice Departments for investigation, prosecution, and judgment by the corrupt local justice system. From the perspective of a decade, the deliberate negligence of such approach is clearer than ever before.

Therefore, the February 19, 2010 response by your office, again referring victims of alleged serious abuses of Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights at the hands of the local, proven corrupt justice system to seek remedies through the same local justice system should be deemed as refusal to perform your duties.

Conditions in the County of Los Angeles, California, the widespread corruption of the judges, and the large-scale abuses of Human Rights were repeatedly brought to your attention in recent years. You repeatedly refused to perform your duties and enforce the law. On such background your comments in a recent press conference in San Bernardino County, California - as quoted by media - that you were "appalled by the corruption", and that you "have never seen anything like this" remained questionable at best...

Please accept this letter as a repeat of the following requests:

1) Please provide your opinion regarding the compliance with California Constitution, or lack thereof, in the California bill SBX-2-11, signed into law on February 20, 2009, providing "retroactive immunities" to all judges who took "not permitted" payments.

2) Please perform your duties and protect the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of the 10 million residents of the County of Los Angeles, California, including, but not limited (a) Complaints, pertaining to alleged large-scale abuses by the Sheriff's Department, copied below,  (b) Ongoing false imprisonment of the thousands of Rampart-FIPs, (c) Ongoing false hospitalization of Attorney Richard Fine, with no medical cause, and (d) Widespread corruption of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, admitted by the judges through the dubious law providing "retroactive immunities" , which was passed at their own behest.

Conditions of the justice system of the State of California reached an all time low under your watch as Attorney General of the State of California.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!


Links:
[1] The Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons - a Review
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs-Falsely-Imprisoned-Persons-Review
[2] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/06-07-15-LAPD-s-Blue-Ribbon-Review-Panel-Report-2006
[3] SBX-2-11 the bill which provided "retroactive immunities to judges who took "not permitted" payments.
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-la-fine-v-la-county-sheriff-doc-01-exh-09-02-20-sbx-2-11-budge-bill.pdf
[4] February 19, 2010 response by office of California Attorney General Jerry Brown to complaints of large-scale, long-term serious alleged abuses of Human Rights by the justice system of the County of Los Angeles, directing the complainant to seek remedies for such abuses with the justice system of the County of Los Angeles.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27886893/10-02-19-California-Attorney-General-Jerry-Brown-Refusal-to-Enforce-the-Law-s

Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:34:09 -0800
To: "Stephanie Maxberry"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Repeat request for assistance in filing complaints pertaining to Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles
Cc: "1st District:   Gloria Molina" , "2nd District Mark Ridley-Thomas"  , "3rd District  Zev Yaroslavsky" , "4th District  Don Knabe" , "5th District  Michael D. Antonovich"

March 5, 2010

Stephanie Maxberry, Ombudsman
County of Los Angeles, California
By email.

Response within 2 business days is kindly requested.

Dear Ombudsman Maxberry:

I have previously forwarded to your office a total of nine (9) Complaints pertaining to the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles, California. Pursuant to your mission, as stated by you, I requested that you assist in filing the Complaints and in ascertaining that the Complaints were adequately investigated.  You also kindly informed me that for a valid Complaint process to be initiated, the Sheriff's Department must issue a 5-6 digit Complaint number for each Complaint. Finally, when no such Complaint numbers were not issued, you advised me to contact your office again if I did not receive such Complaint numbers from the Sheriff's Department by March 4, 2010.

As of today, March 5, 2010, I have never received any Complaint numbers or any other communication from the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles.

For your convenience, listed below are the nine (9) Complaints and the Addendum.  The Complaints pertained to widespread, long term, established practices of the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles, which were alleged as serious violations of fundamental Human Rights pursuant to ratified International Law (and also - Constitutional and Civil Rights pursuant to US law).  The Addendum also pin-pointed the alleged violations in California Law - conduct of arrests and jailing with no valid records, and the cause- large computer systems, which by both design and operation facilitated the conduct of such alleged violations.  The Addendum also proposed the solution - publicly accountable validation of the case management systems of the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles.  Official report of KPMG, Los Angeles, the independent auditor of the County of Los Angeles, was also previously note, which found similar material deficiencies in other central computer systems of the County of Los Angeles.

I request that you facilitate the issuance of Complaint numbers for Complaints #1 through #9, listed below.  In case you conclude that the Sheriff's Department was not likely to issue Complaint numbers or investigate the Complaints as such, please let me know as soon as possible.

Thank you again for your help in this matter.

Response within 2 business days is kindly requested.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!

CC:
1) Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, California
2) KPMG, Los Angeles, Independent Auditor, County of Los Angeles, California
3) Office of Attorney General of the State of California, Jerry Brown.


List of nine (9) Complaints and an Addendum, pertaining to operations of the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles, filed with the Ombudsman of the County of Los Angeles, with request or the issuance of Complaint numbers.

1) Complaint #1 - False arrest and booking data for the falsely hospitalized Attorney Richard Fine, which the Sheriffs Department refused to correct.

2) Complaint #2 - False or Missing Information Regarding Arrest and Booking of Numerous Inmates Held by the Sheriffs Department

3) Complaint #3: False Hospitalizations With No Probable Medical Cause, Appearing As Cover Up For False Imprisonments.

4) Complaint #4: Alleged widespread corruption in bail/bond operations

5) Complaint #5  - False arrests and jailing of Joseph Zernik on February 6 and February 19, 2010

6) Complaint #6 - Misprision of Felonies by the Sheriff's Department in re: Armed abduction of Joseph Zernik by Richard Rodriguez and Javier on February 19, 2010.

7) Complaint #7 - RE: False jailing of Joseph Zernik on February 6 and February 19, 2010 - Disregard for California Public Records Act, Gov Code Govt Code 6254(f).

8) Complaint #8 - RE: False jailing of Joseph Zernik on February 6 and February 19, 2010 - Alleged corruption of bail/bond services and large-scale embezzlement of public funds

9) Complaint #9 - RE: False jailing of Joseph Zernik on February 19, 2010 - Robbery of personal valuables from inmates, and retaliation/harassment/intimidation against victim/witness/informant.

Addendum to Complaints #1:  #2 #3, #5, #6, #8, #9 - False arrests and jailing and hospitalizations
In conjunction with the complaints listed above, please accept the following addendum.

California Code of Regulations, Crime Prevention and Correction 3273 says:

3273. Acceptance and Surrender of Custody.

Wardens and superintendents must not accept or surrender

custody of any prisoner under any circumstances, except by valid

court order or other due process of law.

It is alleged that the complaints referenced above, #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #8, #9, all involved conduct of the Sheriff's Department where inmates were arrested or accepted into jailing with no valid court order or due process of law; That the Sheriff's Department of Los Angeles County established in recent decades computer systems which lacked and lack security, validity, and reliability and therefore must not be deemed as valid court orders or due process of law; That such computer systems were and are routinely used to affect arrests and jailing with no valid court order or due process of law; That for such reasons, the Sheriff's Department was and is out of compliance and in violation of the law and/or regulations.

Therefore, the proposed solution involved publicly accountable validation (certified functional logic verification) of such computer systems, which were and are employed in determination of Liberty of persons in Los Angeles County, California.