Sunday, November 22, 2009

09-11-22 What's wrong with Att David Pasternak? Don't you think you name too many names?


Atty David Pasternak was after all the former President of the LA County Bar Association...

David Pasternak was central to racketeering in both Galdjie v Darwish and Samaan v Zernik.

David Pasternak acted in both cases with no valid appointment order.

David Pasternak holds even today, 2 years after the purported sale of the Zernik property some $360,000 that he claims to be proceeds in this case, with no foundation in the law. California law says that in case of sale of property by court, all proceeds must be distributed within 30 days. Here he held the funds for two years, and engaged in various money laundering operations during that period.


"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

No comments: