Tuesday, October 27, 2009

09-10-27 REQUEST LA COUNTY SUPERVISORS & AUDITOR FOR AUDIT OF ACCOUNTING AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS OF LA COUNTY

09-10-27 ALLEGED FRAUD IN COMPUTER OPERATIONS OF LA COUNTY JUSTICE
SYSTEM COMPOUNDED BY DENIAL OF ACCESS TO RECORDS - SEVERE ABUSE OF
HUMAN RIGHTS AND WIDESPREAD PUBLIC CORRUPTION.
(1) RECORDS OF INMATES HELD BY SHERIFF,
(2) ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT FOR FUNDS DERIVED FROM FEES IN ET (alleged Enterprise Track) CASES OF
THE LA-JR (alleged LA Judiciary Racket), WHICH ARE MARKED IN COURT RECORDS AS “JOURNAL
ENTRY”,
(3) LA SUPERIOR COURT’S CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO “SUSTAIN”.
(4) FAILURE TO REGISTER “RECEIVERSHIPS” AND THEIR ACCOUNTS IN AN AUDITABLE MANNER.
.

See full size image
Don Knabe - Chair
.
August 27, 2009
.
Dear LA County Officials:
.
I am writing to communicate my concerns, in the hope that someone would contact me back
for further information.1 However, I recognize the multiplicity of conflicts – LA County is
named Defendant in two of the five cases that I provide below as examples of computer
based racketeering at the court. All Supervisors are listed as Defendants in one of the
cases. In fact, much of what is described below, can be seen as a direct extension of the
Rampart scandal (1998-2000). The latest officially commissioned report that I found in that
matter - the Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006), in fact refused to perform its charge
– to issue a “final report”, in lieu of the final report f the investigation, which the LAPD failed
to produced through all these years. Instead the Panel concluded that the notion that LA
County Justice System could investigate allegation of widespread corruption within itself
were unreasonable. It recommended an “external investigation.” In a letter to the Attorney
General of the U.S., draft of which is enclosed, I request the appointment of a Special
Counsel. I believe it is inevitable.
.
In fact, one must wonder how it came to be that investigation of the Rampart scandal - the
largest ever corruption scandal, was not removed by Federal agencies. The answer is
complex, but at least in part it reflects patronage by Federal agencies of the LA-JR for at
least a decade.
.
Here, I focused only on some cases of fraud in computer systems of the Los Angeles
County Justice System, since I believe that such frauds are the easiest to prove.
In reviewing a report by the Independent Auditor KPMG, I noticed that the Auditor also
focused on the issue of integrity and control of computer systems of LA County, albeit,
different systems than the ones indicated below. The alleged fraud in the systems below is
seen an affront and abuse of the Human Rights of all the 10 millions who reside in LA
County, California,
.
A. Alleged Fraud in the computer system of the LA County Sheriff Department. –
abused to deprive a citizen of his Liberty, and keep him jailed “off the count”,
“off the record” , in solitary confinement for over half a year.
...
B. Alleged Fraud in the computer system of the LA County Superior Court –
abused to deprive a citizen of his Liberty, and keep him jailed “off the count”,
“off the record”, and to deprive others of property and of other human rights.
...
C. I have no training – but I do have a proven track record – detecting alleged
fraud in the Beverly Hills School District computers

__/s/______
Joseph Zernik

Enclosed:
1) Appendix
2) Letter to Sheriff Baca
3) Draft Letter to U.S. Atty General

The complete record can be viewed at:

09-10-27- REQUEST FOR CLEAR ANSWERS FROM SHERIFF BACA REGARDING ATTY RICHARD FINE'S ARREST & BOOKING PAPERS

Beware: Los Angeles County, California, is a hazard for all free people!

________________________________________________________


October 27, 2009

Dear Sheriff Baca:

In the last couple of weeks, I have discussed by phone with Sergeant Burson and Commander Liang
from your office, my request for copies of the Arrest and Booking records of Att Richard Fine, and my
concerns that no valid records at all were and are in you possession to support the jailing.
I am in final stages of drafting the letter, executive summary of which is provided below.
I request therefore, that you provide a clear answer on the two questions:

1) Would I be allowed to inspect and to copy the original arrest and booking records of Atty
Richard Fine?

2) Where are the original records of the Arrest and Booking of Mr Fine?
The records that are listed online under Inmate Information center, relative to Arrest and Booking
in San Pedro Municipal Department #86 are false and misleading:

a) Atty Richard Fine was arrested in the court of Judge DAVID YAFFE in Mosk
Courthouse downtown.

b) There is no Municipal Department #86 in San Pedro.

c) The Deputy Sheriff in San Pedro: (i) Denied that anybody was arrested or booked
there, (ii) Denied that there were any records of the arrest of Booking of Mr Fine in
his office, (iii) Denied that there were Booking facilities in that location.

In addition, I repeat the suggestion that I made to Commander Liang yesterday that the Sheriffs
computer system be immediately validated(logic verified) through the work of a committee (Including
public representatives) that would also suggest procedures for operations for future reference.

The Sheriffs computer in its current mode of operation is an affront and abuse of Human Rights.

Joseph Zernik