by Joseph Zernik
IN ZERNIK v MELSON ET AL (1:2009cv00805), filed May 1, 2009, Plaintiff claims that USDOJ and FBI have allowed severe abuse of civil rights of the 10 million residents of LA County, California, for years. The complaint alleges widespread corruption of the courts in LA County, California, which is tolerated and patronized by USDOJ and FBI, going back at least as far as 1980's and the Iran-Contra scandal. Furthermore, when faced with congressional inquiries on the matter, KENNETH MELSON (Director, USDOJ), and KENNETH KAISER(Assistant Director, FBI) provided US Congress with alleged fraudulent responses. The complaint seeks relief in orders "to compel U.S. officers to perform their duties".
IN THE CRIMINAL COURTS IN LA: The Rampart-corruption investigation, a 2-year (1998-2000), 200-investigator probe, ended, but no report was ever written... The victims, the Rampart-FIPs (falsely imprisoned persons), estimated in PBS broadcast from 2001 at 8,000 to 30,000, are still locked up 10 years later. Hardly any of the perpetrators (70-80 police officers per media reports) were prosecuted, after the jury conviction of three of the first four corrupt police was overturned by trial judge JACQUELINE CONNOR. In a ruling issued from home, December 22, 2000, she claimed that her own errors in jury instructions fatally biased the jury... The complaint alleges that such corruption is related to ongoing drug sales for profit by law-enforcement agencies, patronized by the courts. Of particular concern is the failure to identify any record of corrective actions relative to the false imprisonment or other abuse of minors among the victims, since the Consent Decree in U.S. v City of LA et al (2:2000cv11769), was framed under 42 USC § 14141 which prohibits "a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States."
IN THE CIVIL COURTS IN LA: Racketeering by judges is alleged in real estate litigations, in collusion with Los Angeles-based COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (CFC), now a subsidiary of BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION (BAC). The complaint alleges that corruption and large-scale fraud against the U.S. government at CFC were evidenced already in a complaint filed with FBI in January 2007. In March 2007 complaint, the liabilities to U.S. government were also correctly projected - at hundreds of billions of dollars. Regardless - FBI and USDOJ have refused to investigate such complaints ever since.
IN THE CIVIL COURTS IN LA: Fraud in the court's case management system SUSTAIN is alleged. The system, installed around 1985, at a time that RONALD GEORGE, today Chief Justice of the Cal Supreme Court was in leadership position at the courts, and is produced by a secretive corporation of the same name, controlled by THE DAILY JOURNAL - the largest newspaper in California. Neither MARTIN BERG (Editor), nor RONALD GEORGE would comment on the subject.
IN THE CIVIL COURTS IN LA: The complaint seeks protection of civil rights of Att RICHARD I FINE, a noted anti-trust attorney, former U.S. prosecutor, who is indefinitely jailed in LA on contempt after leading the efforts to expose that ALL judges in LA SUPERIOR COURT received for years payments, which were finally ruled in October 2008 "NOT PERMITTED" -- ~$45,000 per judge per year -- and would be called by a lay person "BRIBES". Moreover, ALL the judges and failed to disclose such payments.
IN U.S. COURT, DC: The complaint was assigned to the Honorable RICHARD J LEON, May 1, 2009. Request for his disqualification for a cause, based on service as Minority Counsel in Iran Contram, was stamped "Filed" May 13, 2009. Judge RICHARD J LEON refuses to recuse, and the Clerk of Court refuses to assign another judge to rule on the disqualification. Subsequent papers, including evidence of alleged criminal conduct by LA Superior Couret judges, by senior officers of CFC, and by others, were not docketed at all. Instead- papers were forwarded to chambers of Judge Leon. In repeated phone calls to DAVID SCOTT, Assistant Deputy Clerk in charge of Operations Department, no reasonable explanation, founded in the law, was provided for the failure to docket the papers in Pacer. Records of any ruling by the Honorable Richard J Leon pertaining to docketing, or denial thereof, fails to appear in the docket as well...
TO VIEW PAPERS THAT ARE DENIED DOCKETING - GO TO: www.inproperinla.com; scroll down to us-dist-ct-dc-zernik-v-melson and view both the docketed and the undocketed (marked "as mailed") papers.
SEEKING PRO BONO COUNSEL TO RESTORE FIRST AMENDMENT, DUE PROCESS RIGHTS IN US COURT IN WASHINGTON DC.
Cell 310 435 9107