| Last New Visitor Switzerland Visited December 31, 2010 | ![]() |
* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
*
Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004)
*
“…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)
*
“This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)
* "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)
* "Fraude de ejecucion hipotecaria: Las pesadillas propietario continuar"
CNN (7 de Avril 7, 2011)*
"Cerca de 3 milliones de hogares han sido recuperados desde el auge de vivienda termino' en 2006... Ese numero podria dispararse a cerca de 6 milliones en 2013...
Bloomberg (Enero, 2011)*
"... un sistema en el que so'lo las personas poco tienen que obedecer la ley, mientras que los ricos y los banqueros en particular, puede engnar y estfar sin consecuencias..."
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)

Corruption of California courts noted by the United Nations

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?
Friday, December 31, 2010
10-12-31 Welcome Switzerland - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Suiza - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎瑞士- 最后的新访问者!
10-12-31 Natural Born Citizen: Twitter Rules Supreme // Twitter Reglas Supremo // Twitter的规则最高法院



Judge James Robertson_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _President Barack Obama
US District Court, Washington DC

Birth certification question hits Buda, Texas
1) Disclaimer:I have taken no sides in the Birthers' court struggles, and no sides in the Don't Ask Don't Tell issue. In both cases, I only pointed out that the US courts were running pretense litigations with pretense dockets and uncertified judgments on matters of national public policy significance (robbing the citizens through false court actions is old news).
2) To the Point:The latest Birthers' case is before SCOTUS now - Hollister v Soetoro (09-5080)
The issue is the ruling by US Judge James Robertson from the US District Court in Washington DC:
- In refusing to hear evidence about whether Obama is eligible, Robertson wrote in his notice dismissing the case, "The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court."
3) And SCOTUS observer's Prognostication:
The outcome of the matter would be noticed following the January 14, 2010 SCOTUS conference through an unsigned letter from SCOTUS clerk WILLIAM SUTER, or by a signed letter by DANNY BICKEL, signing either as "Staff Attorney", or with no title at all, just as a private citizen.
Review of the paper court file would reveal no evidence of any order certified by a SCOTUS Justice.
Read more:
New eligibility challenge reaches Supreme Court http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=245753#ixzz19iM7NzaO
10-12-31 Welcome France - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Francia - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎法国- 最后的新访问者!
| Last New Visitor France Visited December 31, 2010 | ![]() |
10-12-31 Welcome Malaysia - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Malaysia - Visitante Mas Receiente! // Bienvenido Malasia - Visitantes de Nueva pasado!
| Last New Visitor Malaysia Visited December 31, 2010 | ![]() |



