Friday, March 29, 2013

13-03-17 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Three (3) falsified decision records / simulated service of process

           The three unsigned Decision records of the same date in a new file, opened March 2013, were addressed to a person, who is not a party to the litigation.  The Decision record from the Clerk of the Court was accompanied by an unsigned authentication letter by an unnamed clerk, and the two contradictory Decision records from the Attorney included no authentication letter at all.  All three decisions purported to summon the person to litigation, where he was not a party at all.  
            One of the two contradictory Decision records, received from the Attorney, provided 45 days for the response, while 18 days were left to the purported hearing on the matter.  
            The Chief Clerk of the Court, Mr Israel Hen, refuses to certify any of the Decision records of the Magistrate Court, and also refuses to produce a copy of his appointment record as Chief Clerk.
The 2013 Human Rights Alert (NGO) was titled “Integrity, or lack thereof in the electronic records of the courts of the State of Israel”, and subtitled, “a court that refuses to certify its own records, is certified corrupt.”   
Under some jurisdictions, falsification of court records and in particular, simulated service of process, is a felony.  Such conduct is typical of white-collar organized crime.  In Israel judges were caught in recent years falsifying and/or fabricating their own court records.   New electronic record systems, implemented over the past decade, enable such conduct.  The new systems include invisible signatures - "The Emperor's new clothes"", and undermine the authority and accountability of the clerks for integrity of court records.  The Israel systems, developed and implemented by IBM and EDS, copy key features from similar fraudulent electronic record systems, which had been implemented in the state and US courts a couple of decades earlier.


ab 
All three decisions were received by mail on March 21, 2013:
a) Received by certified mail from the Office of the Clerk, accompanied by an unsigned authentication letter by an unnamed clerk: Decision of March 17, 2013, in File 25607-03-13 by Judge Esperanza Alon  The Requester shall serve the Request on the Responder [Ministry of Welfare - jz] and on Joseph Zernik for their response within 60 days from the date of service.  The Office of the Clerk shall serve the Requester and Social Worker per Civil Procedures.
b) Received by certified mail from Attorney Amos Sadika, accompanied by no authentication letter at all: Decision of March 17, 2013, in File 25607-03-13 by Judge Esperanza Alon  The Requester shall serve the Request on the Responder and on Joseph Zernik for their response within 60 days from the date of service.  The \Office of the Clerk shall serve the Requester and Social Worker per Civil Procedures.
c) Received by certified mail from Attorney Amos Sadika, accompanied by no authentication letter at all: Decision of March 17, 2013, in File 25607-03-13 by Judge Esperanza Alon  The Requester shall serve the Request on the Responder and on Joseph Zernik for their response within 45 days.  Absent agreement. the request shall be reviewed together with Requests that were scheduled for File 1829-06-10 on April 4, 2013, 12:00 noon.  The Office of the \Clerk shall serve the Requester and \Social Worker per Civil Procedure.
Mr Israel Hen, who occupies the office of Chef Clerk of the Haifa Magistrate Court, refuses to certify the court's decisions, and also refuses to produce a copy of his lawful appointment record.

LINKS:
[1] 13-03-17 In RE: RSZ (25607-03-13) in the Haifa Magistrate Court - Three (3) falsified decision records / simulated service of process, received by certified mail from the Clerk of the Court and from Attorney Amos Sadika
[2] 12-06-04 Human Right Alert, Submission;  2013 UPR of the State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"
[3] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert,  Appendix I to Submission; 15th UPR - State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"
[4] 13-01-15 "Lack of integrity of the electronic record systems of the ... courts in Israel," noted in the 2013 Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report, paragraph 25.






The      

13-03-29 Facebook Art: The 10th Amendment


13-03-29 More on the US-Israeli anti-Iran gamble

The heat is increasing, albeit, only in the Hebrew version of Haaretz, not the English one.
MIT Theodore Postol writes directly to Haaretz to challenge the data produced by IDF (84% success rate), and claiming 10% success rate instead.  Furthermore, Postol claims that the deception is not intended only on the people of the State of Israel, but also on potential state clients: Poland and Singapore...
In parallel, Hebrew news papers claim an irreversible red line, relative to Iran's uranium enrichment will be crossed between July to September 2013.   This is typical for the summer season every year, since as it turns out, cloud formations in the winter make it inconvenient time for this kind of war.  jz
MIT''s Theodore Postol
_______________

לאן באמת נעלמו כל הרקטות

בצבא טוענים שאחוז היירוטים של הסוללות עומד על 84%, אך הנתון קרוב יותר ל-10%. ואת זה אף לא רוצה שהלקוחות בסינגפור ובפולין יידעו

  • תיאודור פוסטול
  • 29.03.2013
במאמר שהתפרסם באחרונה שואל הכותב, עוזי רובין, לאן נעלמו הרקטות שנורו על ישראל בזמן עמוד ענן ( הארץ 19.3). להלן תשובה חלקית לשאלתו. אחרי שיגור הרקטות מרצועת עזה הוגשו 746 תביעות על פגיעה במבנים באשדוד, 516 על פגיעות בבאר שבע ו-246 בראשון לציון, אם למנות רק שלוש מערי הדרום שנפגעו. מפה זו מלמדת על התפרסות התביעות ומספר תביעות הנזיקין - 2,098 תביעות על נזקים למבנים ו-1,027 תביעות על נזקים למכוניות. בנוסף, שישה ישראלים נהרגו בהתקפות הרקטות, בהם ארבעה אזרחים, ולפחות 40 אנשים אחרים נפצעו. על פי אחד מדיווחי התקשורת, שלושה מהקורבנות נהרגו כאשר אחד מהם סירב להיכנס למקלט, משום שרצה לצלם את...

On Friday, March 29, 2013 12:17:37 PM UTC+3, Joseph Zernik, Human Rights Alert (NGO) wrote:
Was since published on OpEdNews.com.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-Tel-Aviv-the-Human-Shie-by-Joseph-Zernik-130326-312.html

On Saturday, March 23, 2013 4:37:47 AM UTC+2, Joseph Zernik, Human Rights Alert (NGO) wrote:

13-03-23 Tel Aviv – the human shield in a US-Israeli anti-Iran gamble, and the next Iraq, of self-will?


With Israeli military command centered in Tel Aviv and following routine statements by Iran of its intent to level Tel Aviv if attacked, it is only reasonable to consider the people of Tel Aviv the human shield in a brewing US-Israeli anti-Iran gamble. The Iron Dome anti-ballistic missile system is touted as a main defense under such situation. Reasonable doubts regarding its performance are ignored by most mainstream media, and instilling the Israeli public's confidence in the system's performance was integral to Obama's recent visit to Israel.  Let's hope that the Israeli public is not the subject of a repeat of Collin Powell's deception on the way to war in Iraq. The outcome of all out war with Iran may be devastating to Israel, as it has been to Iraq, and it may also lead to long term US occupation of Israel.

  
Israel's central command (HaKiryah) is located in the midst of the residential area of Tel Aviv, Obama's recent photo opportunity on the backdrop of an Iron Dome battery placed for the occasion at the Tel Aviv airport.