- - -
- - -
- 
- 
-
- 
Alex Kozinski- Richard Tallman- Richard Paez- Marsha Berzon;Stephen Reinhardt;Milan Smith
In June 2008 Dr Joseph Zernik filed emergency petitions to the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, regarding denial of access to the courts by U.S. District Court, LA, in Zernik v Connor et al. The pro se clerk, Chris Sawyer, for months, refused to issue valid summons, after he adulterated the initial valid summons presented to him by Joseph Zernik on March 5, 2008. Chris Sawyer claimed that he was doing so by instructions of Magistrate Carla Woehrle, and there was good reason to believe that he was truthful.
The U.S Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit:
1) Eliminated some of the papers filed by Joseph Zernik from the docket. There is full documentary evidence that such records were filed, and were on file at the office of the clerk even months later. However, they were deleted from the docket, with no procedure or documentation of the ruling to do so.
2) Denied the Petitions summarily, using verbatim the same standard language used a year later on Atty Richard Fine -
3) Failed to sign the Orders, as in the case of Richard Fine.
________________________
Unsigned Order
JOSEPH ZERNIK,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent,
JACQUELINE O'CONNOR; et al;
Real Parties in Interest.
No. 08-72714
D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW
Central District of California, Los Angeles
ORDER
Before: REINHARDT, BERZON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the emergency petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
No motions for reconsideration, modification, or clarification of this order shall be filed or entertained.
________________________
Ineffectual Docketing Text
06/25/2008 3 Order filed (STEPHEN R. REINHARDT, MARSHA S. BERZON
2 pg, 31.57 KB and MILAN D. SMITH, JR.)Petitioner has not demonstrated that
this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the
extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States
Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the
emergency petition for writ of mandamus is denied. No motions for
reconsideration, modification, or clarification of this order shall be
filed or entertained. [Denied;Terminated on the merits after
submissions without oral hearing;Written, reasoned, unsigned,
unpublished; ] (KAB)
________________________
Question:
Why were no complaints filed against Circuit Judges Tallman, Paez, Reihhardd, Berzon, M. Smith?
Answer:
Although a reasonable person may conclude that these Circuit Judges were involved in various criminalities, from perversion of justice to mail fraud, Complaints were only regarding Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, and Clerk of the Court Molly C Dwyre.
The reason was that if the same standards were applied to all Circuit Judges, there probably would remain no Judges on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The conduct was common. It was believed that the Circuit Judges should go before a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and permitted to continue in their positions. Richard Fine is the natural candidate to chair such commission
Linked Records:
1. June 25, 2008 unsigned, unsigned, false and deliberately misleading court record Order:
"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment