Ghosts, gremlins and
soft-boiled eggs... It is difficult to understand how Attorney
Feldman writes one thing and its opposite within less than three
weeks in a matter that pertains to the fundamental integrity of the
Israeli courts, and fraud by judges Yitzhak Cohen, Esther Hellman,
Haim Galpaz and Avraham Avraham in the Roman Zadorov court file...
Worse yet, what Attorney Feldman wrote today appears as
misleading information relative to common practice in the
Israeli courts today - the publication of invalid, misleading and
fraudulent records by judges... Such matters were fully
clarified in the Judiciary Ombudsman's decision regarding Judge Varda
AlSheikh's "Reconstructed Protocol" affair. Therefore,
it is hard to believe that Attorney Feldman writes today out of sheer
ignorance. The entire situation calls for reputable Israeli
computer science experts to voice their opinions (outside Israel, the
matter has been reviewed and published numerous times). Some Israeli
CS experts have voiced their opinions in private, but so far only
Prof Uzzi Ornan has voiced it publicly!
ראה
בבלוג: View in blog:
Figures: Protest
sign in support of Roman Zadorov in the OccupyTLV camp. Attorney
Avigdor Feldman, former Zadorov Counsel during part of the 5 year
Supreme Court appeal process, originating in non-existent "Verdict"
and "Sentencing" records of the Nazareth
District
Court.
_____
Dear
Attorney Feldman:
Thank
you very much! It is an honor for me to have you directly address my
work for the second time in less than 3 weeks. There is no
doubt that you help me more than anybody else in placing the fraud in
development and operation of Net-HaMishpat, as well as the serious
fraud by Nazareth District Court judges Yitzhak Cohen, Esther
Hellman, Haim Galpaz, and Avraham Avraham in State
of Israel v Roman Zadorov on
the public agenda.
With
it, it appears to me that you are confused and confusing...
Less
than three weeks ago, you wrote clearly, short and to the point:
On
2016-01-21 10:32 am, Feldman wrote:
Yosef
Shalom,
In
my opinion you are doing a very important work. The court system is
known for its insistence that papers filed in court must be
authentic, not scanned, not soiled by carbon (during the carbon copy
period). And you show that the court system itself was hijacked
through an unsupervised electronic system, which enables the judges
to do with the judgments as they wish, and raising serious doubts
whether judges, who signed their agreement on judgment records indeed
read them. Also your comments relative to Judge Yitzhak Cohen make me
lose sleep at night, and I am checking them in depth.
Thank
you for your persistent and thorough work.
Avigdor
Feldman
In
contrast, today it was brought to my attention that you wrote the
opposite on your Facebook wall (copied below), referring to robots,
ghosts, gremlins, beetles, and soft-boiled eggs... I am
hard-pressed to believe that the two pieces were written by the same
person...
Worse
yet, what you wrote today appears as false and misleading
information, which is aimed at protecting the fraud by Judges Yitzhak
Cohen, Esther Hellman, Haim Galpaz, and Avraham Avraham in the Roman
Zadorov court file in Nazareth, and similar frauds, which are
perpetrated today on a routine basis in the Israeli courts (examples
below).
Fabrication/perversion
of court records for the obstruction of justice is a well-known
criminality by judges worldwide for generations...
Such
fraud is based on the publication of fabricated, perverted,
unauthentic, invalid court records, which look like valid and
effectual court records... These matters were fully exposed in the
Ombudsman of the Judiciary decision in Judge Varda AlSheikh's
“Reconstructed Protocol” affair. Therefore, it I am hard-pressed
to believe that a person of your stature writes out of ignorance, and
one must wonder what motivated you to write what you wrote today...
'My
very important work', as you wrote less than 3 weeks ago, pertains
not only to IT system of the Israeli government, but also to IT
systems elsewhere (California courts, California prisons, federal US
courts). Academic
papers, which I authored on the subject, are cited in a textbook on
"Machine Learning" (which I had no part in writing or
editing) among "Notable Uses" of "Data Mining",
in the following context:
Data
mining of government records - particularly records of the justice
system (i.e., courts, prisons) - enables the discovery of systemic
human rights violations in connection to generation and publication
of invalid or fraudulent legal records by various government
agencies.
Information
pertaining to the US federal courts, which I filed, was summarized in
the UN Human Rights Council (Professional Report, 2015), as follows:
HRA
NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the
courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making
such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.
Information
pertaining to IT systems of the courts of the State of Israel, which
I filed, was summarized in the UN Human Rights Council (Professional
Staff Report, 2013), as follows:
Lack of integrity in the electronic records of the supreme court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel.
Likewise,
my papers were reviewed, presented and published by international
academic conferences, which specialize in electronic government in
general, and IT systems of the courts in particular. The latest
conference of this type was the European Conference on e-Government
(ECDG2015) in England. The title of my paper there, presented and
published subject to expert peer review was:
Fraudulent New IT Systems of the Israeli Courts – Unannounced Regime Change?
Roman Zadorov affair: fabrication/perversion of court records, obstruction of justice by the Nazareth District Court judges, leading to false arrest of the innocent.
What
you wrote today is particularly serious, relative to the false
prosecution, false conviction and false imprisonment of Roman Zadorov
by the justice and law enforcement system. As you are well-aware,
right now, the issue in the Zadorov court file in the Nazareth
District Court has nothing to do with the electronic records, but
with the paper
record.
Inspection of the electronic records has been concluded for the time being:
Following inspections, lasting about a year, no lawfully signed, authentic records of the September 14, 2010 “Verdict” or “Sentencing” in the matter of State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502-07) have been discovered... neither in the Nazareth District Court, nor in the Supreme Court (where the appeal court file was supposed to hold authenticated, certified copies of the judgments, in which the appeal originated...) Such records have never been entered in the “Judgment Docket” in Net-HaMishpat either. And the Nazareth District Court denies access to the electronic signature data of the records in this court file.
Inspection of the electronic records has been concluded for the time being:
Following inspections, lasting about a year, no lawfully signed, authentic records of the September 14, 2010 “Verdict” or “Sentencing” in the matter of State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502-07) have been discovered... neither in the Nazareth District Court, nor in the Supreme Court (where the appeal court file was supposed to hold authenticated, certified copies of the judgments, in which the appeal originated...) Such records have never been entered in the “Judgment Docket” in Net-HaMishpat either. And the Nazareth District Court denies access to the electronic signature data of the records in this court file.
And
yet, the evidence, which was discovered in the electronic records in
the court file would be considered by any reasonable person serious
serial fraud by judges of the Nazareth District court:
Figures: Two fabricated, perverted “Decision” records, dated December 27, 2015 and January 12, 2016, issued by Judge Esther Hellman, pertaining to requests to inspect the Zadorov court file. Such records are published on the letterhead of "The Courts", instead of the letterhead "Nazareth District Court", are clearly the products of scanning of paper records into the electronic case management system, and therefore the signatures on them are “graphic signatures” (“scanned signatures”) - lacking any validity and authority. The issuance of such court records was the core of the fraudulent conduct of Judge Varda AlSheikh in the “Reconstructed Protocol” scandal. Decision of the Ombudsman of the Judiciary regarding Judge Varda AlSheikh and the “Reconstructed Protocol” clarifies that decision record in Net-HaMishpat (case management system of the Israeli courts), which do not duly bear an electronic signature, are invalid court records, merely a “draft”. A “request to correct perverted court file” was filed with Judge Esther Hellman in the Zadorov court file, following her December 27, 2015 perverted “Decision” records. In response, she issued the fabricated, perverted January 12, 2016 “Decision” record, which claimed that she had “technical problems”, and claimed that fabricated, perverted, invalid court records were valid and effectual court records...