IN PRO PER IN LA: 09-11-26 What is a Warrant and why there is none for Richard Fine

Los Angeles County, California:

* "Los Angeles County got the best courts that money could buy". KNBC (October 16, 2008) * "Innocent people remain in prison" LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
*
Los Angeles County is "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud." FBI (2004)
*
“…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)
*
“This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

USA: * "Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue" CNN (April 7, 2011) * About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006... That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013... Bloomberg (January 2011) * "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." UProf Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)

Condado de Los Angeles, California:

* "Condado de Los Angeles tiene las mejores canchas que el dinero puede comprar".KNBC (16 de octubre de 2008) * "Las personas inocentes permanecen en prisión" LAPD Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión Report (2006) * Condado de Los Angeles es "el epicentro de la epidemia de bienes raíces y el fraude de la hipoteca." FBI (2004) * "... Los jueces juzgado y condenado a un asombroso número de personas por crímenes que no cometieron." Prof. David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "Esta es una conducta asociada con los dictadores más represivos y los estados de la policía ... y los jueces deben compartir la responsabilidad, cuando es condenado a personas inocentes." Prof. Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine, la Facultad de Derecho (2000)

EE.UU.:

* "Fraude de ejecucion hipotecaria: Las pesadillas propietario continuar"
CNN (7 de Avril 7, 2011) *
"Cerca de 3 milliones de hogares han sido recuperados desde el auge de vivienda termino' en 2006... Ese numero podria dispararse a cerca de 6 milliones en 2013...
Bloomberg (Enero, 2011) *
"... un sistema en el que so'lo las personas poco tienen que obedecer la ley, mientras que los ricos y los banqueros en particular, puede engnar y estfar sin consecuencias..."

Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)

___

Our right to access public records, our Liberty and our fundamental Human Rights are all connected at the hips!

Nuestro derecho al acceso los expedientes publicos, nuestra libertad y nuestros derechos humanos fundamentales están todos conectados en las caderas!

我们有权获得公共记录，我们的自由和基本人权都连接在臀部！

Hips by Beyonce'

Corruption of California courts noted by the United Nations

La Corrupción de los Tribunales de California Señaló que Naciones Unidas // 加州法院的腐败注意到联合国

In summer 2010, the staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, as part of the first ever, 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, noticed and referenced the Human Rights Alert April 2010 submission, pertaining to "corruption of the courts, the legal profession, and discrimination by law enforcement in California".

10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

Thursday, November 26, 2009

09-11-26 What is a Warrant and why there is none for Richard Fine

1) What is a Warrant?
A Warrant establishes the legal foundation for an Arrest. A Warrantless Arrest is deemed violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and also represents Arbitrary Arrest in violation of Human Rights in ratified International Law.

An "Arrest Warrant" is usually issued by a criminal court judge. The judge determines that there is a probable cause that the subject of the warrant committed a crime. An "Arrest Warrant" is usually requested by a prosecutor, who filed a complaint against the subject, and who presents that judge with the probable cause.

2) What does it look like?

Some of these are a bit old -

____________

Example #1

Arrest Warrant

warrant page 1

warrant page 2

____________

Example #2

Randy Quaid Wanted by Police for Defrauding an Innkeeper

September 24th, 2009

Allegedly Comedian Randy Quaid and his wife are wanted for Burglary and theft of a Bed and Breakfast Inn located in Santa Barbara, California estimated damage are near $20,000. More to come as news trickles in

____________

Example #3

3) Why was there none for Richard Fine?

Because he was subjected to warrantless, arbitrary arrest. Because his arrest was in violation of the law.

4) Why wasn't it an issue in the Habeas Corpus petition or the Energency Peititon to the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit?

Because these were not honest, valid, and effectual court actions, these were dishonest, invalid, and ineffectual court actions, in other words - sham court actions.

- -- -

5) Could you provide an example of an honest valid, effectual court action in re: Warrantless Arrest?

____________

Example #1
Article: 9th Circuit: Warrantless arrest of felon is alright
Article from:
Crime Control Digest
Article date:
March 7, 2003

Author:
Anonymous
Copyright
Police with a warrant to search for a suspect have authority to arrest an armed felon unnamed in the warrant who resides at the same address, the 9th Circuit decided.
Bobby Der Enslin argued U.S. marshals had no constitutional right to arrest him on a gun possession charge when marshals had a warrant for another person
____________
Example #2

9th Circuit rules warrantless arrest justified by standoff
By Anonymous
Publication: Lawyers USA
Date: Monday, March 16 2009
Police need not obtain an arrest warrant before taking a suspect into custody after a 12-hour armed standoff, even though exigent circumstances may have dissipated, the en banc 9th Circuit has ruled.
The defendant was in his home when he pointed a gun at a security guard investigating loud music
in another apartment. When police arrived, he was visibly drunk, belligerent and threatened to shoot police if he came on or near his property.
After a 12-hour standoff during which the defendant retreated into his apartment for several hours, the police arrested him.
He sued under [section]1983, claiming that the police should have obtained a warrant because the exigency had dissipated by the time they arrested him.
A U.S. District Court and the 9th Circuit agreed.
But the en banc panel reversed.
"This armed standoff was a single Fourth Amendment event. ... [The defendant] threatened the officers shortly after they arrived, and retained full control of his eighteen guns and ammunition until the end. The entire standoff was an uninterrupted, fluid engagement between [him] and the police. ... In sum, no event of Fourth Amendment significance occurred that would re-trigger the warrant requirement and compel the police to inquire as to whether exigent circumstances still existed. ...
"[S]uggesting that a magistrate should be telling police in the middle of the standoff that they must withdraw or what tactics are permissible does not strike us as a reasonable role for a judicial officer under the Fourth Amendment," the court said.
U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. Fisher v. San Jose, No. 04-16095. March 11, 2009. Lawyers USA No. 993-554.
Credit: Lawyers USA Staff
"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.