Investigation of this case should be easy, because the data is computrized... The issue would only be how far to go, and my suggestion would be to limit its scope, while allowing the public full access to public records, as provided by law.. Let the public do the rest of the job. It is an essential part of the lesson from this case.
The public must keep an eye on the public records at all times...
A. Some examples of my employment of heuristics on public records in the past:
1) Filing the Request to File as Party in Interest at the 9th Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals, protesting in advance the future sham court action that was an unsigned invalid, ineffectual, false and misleading court order by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, and Circuit Judges Richard Tallman, Richard Paez, in Fine v Sheriff (09 )
2) Notice sent to Eric Sheptock, a homeless guy in Washington DC, regarding corruption of his case in U.S. District Court there, in Sheptock v Fenty et al. I knew practically nothing about the case to start out, I was just experimenting with heuristics, to see how effective they would be i scanning large numbers of cases. In that instance - in the U.S.District Court in Washington DC.
3) Once you got some initial hooks through such scans, you easily found other, at times more interesting cases, which were related - the case of Scooter Libby, for example, arising out of Plame v Cheney.
4) Notice provided to Steven Schaffer in re: Schaffer v Hartford Life (5:08-CV-01184) at the U.S. Court, Central District of California
B. Some examples of heuristics that could be utilized in investigating the LA Superior Court:
1) Search for cases with multiple judges involved:
- Most of these cases involved much larger number of judges than in a normal case.
- It may serve to produce deniabilities, lame as they may be.
- More likely- the large number of judges involved deter the USAO or FBI from taking any action.
- E.g. Michael Wilner, LA USAO - "You named too many names..." - as if it were my fault that this was a racket, and not a mom n pop operation as part of a cottage industry...
2) Search for cases that were much longer than average.
In Samaan v Zernik the clerk's office created the "Volume IV Continued", over 700 pages, compared to other volumes, which were around 200 pages - again - statistically a class of its own. It served to hide the "Non -Party" Countrywide/Bank of America Corporation papers. When I caught the hoax (October 2007?), the clerk was deeply embarrassed, and in way of apology, he mumbled - "This is not the only one, we have quite a few of them around here." I therefore suggest a heuristic for investigators: To save time and money, just quickly scan the clerk's office for any volumes that were much thicker than the average, they may be at higher likelihood significant to the investigations.
Linked Records
1) Message to Eric Sheptock
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2009/06/message-to-eric-sheptock-homeless-in.html
No comments:
Post a Comment