09-11-21 What's wrong with PACER & CM/ECF?

- - -

The U.S. Courts have just completed the installation of a dual docketing system, Pacer, and CM/ECF

1. Such systems established separate and unequal access to court records, where the courts can segregate parties at will.
2. Those segregated into Pacer (attorneys who are not authorized by the court, pro se filers, and invariably all prisoners who file petitions) are unable to distinguish the valid and effectual court records from the large volume of invalid and ineffectual records posted online, since they are denied access to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings).
3. Therefore, litigations are conducted under such conditions - where one party, but none of the others, is left in the dark relative to the validity and effect of various records posted in the docket by the court during litigation.
4. Such conditions in litigations in U.S. Courts, may be found by International Human Rights Courts to be extreme violation of Human Rights by the U.S. Government and U.S. Courts.
5. It may also be found to be the largest Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind.
6. It amounted to major changes in Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedures, or even in the U.S. Constitution and the Amendments, with no authority at all.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.