10-11-02 Case management and online public records of the US and State of California courts - a call for records for a scholarly series

Re: Case management and online public records of the US and State of California courts -  a call for records for a scholarly series


Dear friend:

Your help would be greatly appreciated in providing records of cases of interest in the US and State of California courts.

The materials are intended for use in an ongoing series of scholarly publications in peer-reviewed international journals, pertaining to the operations of the US and State of California courts from the ministerial perspective in both civil and criminal cases.[1] I am not an attorney, and do not pretend to engage in legal review.  Therefore, the records below [2] are sufficient.  No need for anything else.

Your help in the matter would be greatly appreciated, but never acknowledged.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
[1] Ongoing series of scholarly publications in peer-reviewed international journals, pertaining to the operations of the US and State of California courts from the ministerial perspective.
a) Previously published in the series:
i 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty  Online Public Prisoners� Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
ii. 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
iii. 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG)) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
b) Under review:
iv 10-10-30 Zernik, J Case Management and Online Public Access Systems of the Courts in the United States - A Call for Action - pending
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40511204/
c) Planned:
v. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Case studies of Marina v LA County, Sturgeon v LA County, Galdjie v Darwish, and Samaan v Zernik (P1/5)
vi. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Registers of Actions (California Civil Dockets) (P2/5)
vii. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Minutes (P3/5)
viii. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Denial of Access to records as integral to alleged racketeering (P4/5)
ix. Sustain, the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Ambiguation of entry of judgments as integral to alleged racketeering (P5/5)
x. Online public access system of the California Courts of Appeals, 2nd, and 4th District
Case studies of Marina v LA County, Sturgeon v LA County, Galdjie v Darwish, and Samaan v Zernik xi. PACER and CM/ECF - Public Access and Case Management Systems of the US Courts
Case study of SEC v BAC
[2] REQUESTED INFORMATION AND RECORDS:
a. US District Court, <> District of < >
a) Complaint under cause of actions of <>and Summons (or equivalents in criminal cases) with respective NEFs
b) Particular Order of significance with respective NEF (Minutes and Proof of Service/Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by Clerk at the California courts).
c) Dispositive Order with respective NEF. (Minutes and Proof of Service/Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by Clerk at the California courts).
d) Ancillary proceedings Motion (if any) under cause of actions of <>with respective NEF. (Minutes and Proof of Service/Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by Clerk at the California courts).
e) Ancillary proceedings Dispositive Order (if any) with respective NEF. (Minutes and Proof of Service/Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by Clerk at the California courts).
(If more than one judge was involved, please give between the ones above, at least one order/judgment of each of the judges involved.)
(If possible, I would like to have a copy of the orders/judgments in the exact form that they were served by the court - whether it was electronic or paper service.)
b) US Court of Appeals, <> District (Petitions/Appeals)i. Commencing records (Petition under cause of action of <>/Notice of Appeal, with respective NDA)
ii. Particular Order of significance with respective NDA
iii. Dispositive Order with respective NDA.
(If more than one judge was involved, please give between the ones above, at least one order/judgment of each of the judges involved.)
(If possible, I would like to have a copy of the orders/judgments in the exact form that they were served by the court - whether it was electronic or paper service.)
c) US Supreme Court (Applications/Petitions for) 
i. Commencing records (Petition/Application for <>, with respective proof of filing from the office of the clerk)
ii. Particular Order of significance with respective notice and proof of service.
iii. Dispositive Order with respective notice and proof of service.
(If more than one justice was involved, please give between the ones above, at least one order/judgment of each of the judges involved.)
(If possible, I would like to have a copy of the orders/judgments in the exact form that they were served by the court - whether it was electronic or paper service.)