10-11-29 Alleged Corruption of US Supreme Court Dockets // La presunta corrupción de los EE.UU. Expedientes de la Corte Suprema

 

To: lawsters@googlegroups.comFrom: joseph zernik Subject: Re:Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation, et al. (10-411) -
  crooked courts and "order entered"Cc: bill@billwindsor.com

Hi Bob:

Same old, same old...

Bill Windsor writes: "An order was entered today by The Supreme Court ..." and as documentation of that fact he links us to the online docket of SCOTUS in Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation, et al (10-411).  [1]
In all US courts that were asked, the clerks refused to certify the online dockets.

Does Bill Windsor have in his possession an order, certified by a Justice of SCOTUS, and authenticated by an authorized Clerk of SCOTUS, to convince us that "an order was entered"?
As previously shown, [2] SCOTUS today practices that same very scam, used in other US courts, where dockets are published online, noting various rulings, orders, decisions, judgments, while in fact, there is no valid judicial record to provide the foundation for such online dockets... 

Mr Windsor, please show us the goods,...

The proposed solutions is two fold:

1) Placing the clerks of the US courts under sole authority of the US Attorney General, not the US Judges, and

2) Enactment of federal rules of electronic court records, to restore accountability of the clerks for electronic (including online) records, which today they deem themselves unaccountable for.
Joseph Zernik

LINKS:
[1]  Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation, et al (10-411) - Docket
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-411.htm
[2] 10-11-25 William Suter – Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States – Evidence of Public Corruption
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44034212/

At 07:45 PM 11/29/2010, Bob wrote:

Here’s a case in point.  Bill  Windsor complains that the SCOTUS will not protect him from crookedness of lower  courts.  It made him so mad he created a web site protesting it.

Imagine the mess if Windsor, Ken Smith, and everyone else screwed by crooked courts would work together to stop the crookedness.  They might actually succeed. But operating singly, they will only lose, one at a time.

Bob Hurt – http://bobhurt.com – 727 669 5511
2460 Persian Drive #70, Clearwater, Florida 33763 USA 

From: William M. Windsor [ mailto:williamwindsor@bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:56 AM
To: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Subject: Supreme Court says Judicial Corruption and Constitutional Violations are not worthy of their Consideration

An order was entered today by The Supreme Court on William M. Windsor’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari (appeal) of one of the most horrendous of the orders by the corrupt judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.  The Petition was denied.  See:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-411.htm

This may tell us how The Supreme Court will rule on judicial corruption and the ability for federal judges to void parts of the Constitution and Bill of Rights because essentially the same questions were asked as in my petitions for writs of mandamus:

“There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter.  These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons.  Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case.  The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court.

“The key questions are:

 

1.     Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts.

2.     Whether the Supreme Court is prepared to declare the Constitution and its amendments null and void.”

The differences are that The Supreme Court doesn’t have any obligation to deal with a petition for writ of certiorari, but they do have to deal with petitions for writs of mandamus.  In 2009, only 1.1 of 100 petitions for writs of certiorari were granted cert, which means they approved them for further consideration.  However, the reason for granting certiorari is allegedly when a case may set an important precedent.  With this decision, they had an opportunity to deal with the corruption, and didn’t….

I would have been surprised if they had granted this, but this is very discouraging.  I would think that if honest judges were told that the federal judges in Atlanta are corrupt and are violating the Constitution, they would act.  We’ll see what happens on the vital petitions for writs of mandamus, but I now suspect they will essentially void big hunks of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

What in the world are we going to do if they rule this way on the petitions for writs of mandamus?  We will know that our Supreme Court justices are corrupt, too.

I will continue to update the home page of www.lawlessamerica.com with the latest developments.

Please pass this news along.  One of our only hopes is if we can reach enough people through email because the mainstream media is afraid of the judges.

William M. Windsorbill@billwindsor.com
Office: 770-578-1094