The June 16, 2016 letter by Administration of Courts, sent to Wordpress in order to remove a post by anti judicial corruption activist Lori Shem Tov is the latest in a series of fraudulent actions by the Israeli Administration of Courts. The big one - development and implementation of Net-HaMishpat - the new, fraudulent case management system of the courts... Administration of Courts is Fraud Central of a justice system that is notorious for widespread incompetence and/or corruption...
Figures 1: Lori Shem Tov - anti family court corruption activist; Judge Michael Spitzer - Director of Administration of Courts - Fraud Central of the Israeli justice system.
OccupyTLV, July 16 - Prof Asa Kasher, member of the Justice (ret) Edna Arbel "Committee on Establishing Protection for the Public and Public Service Employees against Activity and Harmful Publications as well as Hooliganism on the Internet" was asked to opine on a June 16, 2016 letter, sent by the Israeli Administration of Courts to Wordpress, asking to remove a blog post by Lori Shem Tov - anti family court corruption activist - pertaining to Judge Ben Shalev.
Figure 2: June 16, 2016 letter by Attorney Liat Yousim, Administration of Courts, purportedly to Wordpress, which is suspect fraud. The letter asks for removal of a post pertaining to Judge Ben Shalev of the Beer Sheva Family Court. The post reports that Judge Ben Shalev granted a request by a father for a Restraining Order, prohibiting a woman from leaving Israel with their minor child.
The letter is suspected fraud for various reasons, among them:
a. The letter shows no reference number, as required in official government communications.
b. The letter, which is addressed to a US corporation in the US, is written in Hebrew.
c. Attorney Liat Yousim signs as "Authority pertaining to Slander of Judges" - a suspect fictitious title. Freedom of Information Request was filed today with the Administration of Court, asking for any record showing Attorney Yousim's appointment to such, or any other position. However, in similar situations in the past the Administration of Courts failed to answer on Freedom of Information requests.
d. The letter was sent to Lori as a Word file, signed by a "graphic signature", which the judges consider invalid, and such record is considered by the judges merely a "draft".
e. The letter mixes up articles of the law and claims, with dubious authority and legal foundation, that the publication amounts to Contempt of the Court and Libel.
f. The letter is not the first fraud of this kind by the Administration of Courts.
Prof Kasher was asked, as a member of the committee, which was purportedly established to protect the public, but in fact was aimed primarily to protect the judges:
a. Whether indeed "Authority pertaining to Slander of Judges" existed at all.
b. His opinion regarding validity of the letter as official government communication.
c. Weather in his opinion the letter represented Due Process in this matter.
The fraudulent letter to Wordpress is only the latest in a campaign against Lori Shem Tov and other activists, including fraudulent search and seizure warrants, fraudulent Draconian judgments. 
The Spokeswoman for the Administration of Courts failed to answer on request to explain what appeared as mobilization of the US Department of Homeland Security to issue a "Preservation of Information" instruction on Wordpress, pertaining to Lori and other activists... DHS failed to answer on how such action fit their legal charge (that is unless Lori was defined by the Israeli Administration of Courts and/or by DHS as some kind of international terrorist)...
The Administration of Courts in Israel is notorious as the judiciary's Fraud Central.
In a previous case, Judge Michael Spitzer was asked to respond on specific evidence of fraud in Net-HaMishpat (new fraudulent case management system of the courts). The request referred to the UN Human Rights Council 2013 report, which found "lack of integrity" in the Israeli courts, and a report, published by the European Conference on E-government which found IT systems of the Israeli courts "fraudulent" (see below).
In response, a short letter was received, signed by "Internal Auditor" Ofra Tam Rosner, stating that "integrity of the courts is beyond any doubt..." Administration of Courts refused to produce a record documenting the lawful appointment of "Internal Auditor" Ofra Tam Rosner.
In yet another case, an unsolicited letter was received from the Administration of Courts as "Response" on an "Inquiry" that never was (Figure 3). The letter, signed by Attorney Heli Bracha, "Legal Bureau" claimed that "from computational perspective", "Post-it Decisions" in Net-HaMishpat (new fraudulent case management system of the courts) cannot be docketed.
Figure 3: July 27, 2015 fax from Attorney Heli Bracha "The Legal Bureau" of the Administration of Courts, claiming that "from computational perspective" "Post-it Decisions" in Net-HaMishpat - the new fraudulent case management system of the Israeli courts - cannot be docketed and cannot be viewed.
Attorney Heli Bracha refused to answer on repeat requests to explain:
- What is the title of her position, beyond "Legal Bureau".
- What was the "Inquiry", on which she purportedly responded.
- What case and court the letter referred to.
- Who were the computing experts who provided the information that she purported to communicate.
Judge Michael Spitzer, Director of Administration of Courts failed to answer to the point on repeat requests to investigate Attorney Heli Bracha's letters as patent fraud.
In two prominent cases in recent years, the Administration of Courts was key partner in cardinal judicial fraud:
Figure 4: September 22, 2011 fraud by Attorney Barak Laser, Legal Counsel of the Administration of Courts - filing of semi-criminal complaint against Attonrey Rafael Argaz based on an unsigned and uncertified, "fabricated"/sham/simulated "protocol" record by Judge Varda Alshech.
In September 2011, Attorney Barak Laser, Legal Counsel of the Administration of Courts filed with the Israel Bar Association under his signature a semi-criminal complaint against Attorney Rafael Argaz. It was the opening shot in one of the worst incompetence and/or corruption scandals in the history of the Israeli courts. As it turned out, the complaints was based on a sham/simulated Judge Varda Alshech protocol, unsigned and uncertified. That - when in the peculiar Israeli court system, Attorney Barak Laser is one of the only persons in Israel (except judges), who has access to inspect, whether an electronic court record is signed, valid record, or just a sham/simulated/"draft" record.
Fraud in the Administration of Courts appears to be a family business. Attorney Barak Laser's spouse - Spokeswoman Ayelet Filo was the one who released to the press the fraudulent record of Tel-Aviv Judge David Rosen Verdict record in the notorious Holyland corruption scandal, involving former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert (Figure 5).
a. The record, which appears in Net-HaMishpat Decisions Docket - fails to be entered in the Judgment Index. The record is 685 page long, is a scanned record - i.e., is not a valid electronic record. It is missing the opening pages, naming the parties in the case, and is also missing the hand signature and personal stamp at the end. The record is perverted in an unusual manner, which is unlikely to be the outcome of human error.
b. The record, which was distributed by the Administration of Courts to media - entirely fails to appear in Net-HaMishpat, is a scanned record - i.e., is not a valid electronic record, and all its pages are strangely cropped, possibly to conceal the fact that it is a scanned record. The record is 687 page long, ending with a "wet" hand signature and stamp of Judge David Rosen.
c. In the appeal court file (paper court file - original records), only a printout of the Verdict from Nevo Publishing LTD was discovered – not a court record at all. An appeal, which originates in no authentic decision or judgment record of the lower court should be deemed lacking in authority and validity.
Judge David Rosen denied a request to inspect the Judgment record in the court file, claiming in an unsigned "Post-it Decision", which he refused to docket, that the records were "physically" transferred to the Supreme Court as part of the appeal (Figure 6). That - in a court that by then had been administered for 5 years in electronic files... Inspection in the Supreme Court also failed to discover the authentic judgment record...
Figure 6: State of Israel v Zerni et al (10291-01-12) in the Tel-Aviv District Court – Judge David Rosen March 18, 2015 Post-it Decision: In response to an attempt to inspect “lawfully made judgment records” pertaining to Ehud Olmert and Shula Zaken and a “lawfully made Arrest Decree” pertaining to Shula Zaken (who was already serving her prison term), Judge David Rosen issued the "Post-it Decision", which says: “The court file, inspection of which is requested, is physically located in the Supreme Court, as part of the appeal process of the judgment. Therefore, it is impossible to grant the request”. This Post-it decision was never duly served, fails to appear in the Decisions Docket, and Judge David Rosen refused to provide a duly signed and certified copy of it. Therefore, it should be deemed a sham/simulated court record. With it, the record should be deemed tacit admission by Judge David Rosen that there is no “lawfully made” judgments or arrest decree in the Net-HaMishpat electronic court file in this case – five (5) years after the transition to electronic file administration in the Tel-Aviv District Court. Effectively, it is admission that the records in Net-HaMishpat Judgments Docket and Decisions Docket are invalid court records.
Above and beyond - the Administration of Courts was in charge of development and implementation, and is today in charge of the operation of Net-HaMishpat, the new case management system of of the Israeli courts. The system was opined fraud in report submitted to the UN Human Rights Council, which led to a comment in the HRC 2013 report on Israel "lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel". The system was also opined fraud in a report, which was published subject to peer-review by the 2015 European Conference on E-government, titled: "New fraudulent IT systems in the Israeli courts: Unannounced regime change?"
In response to request for comments by Judge Michael Spitzer on such reports of fraud in the Israeli courts, a letter was received by the Administration of Courts "Internal Auditor", which stated: "Integrity of the courts is beyond any doubt". But the Administration of Courts refused to produce any record, documenting the lawful appointment of such "Internal Auditor".
Complaint, which has been recently filed with the UN Human Rights Council in the matter of Roman Zadorov produced evidence that Zadorov is held arbitrarily, with no judicial records as the legal foundation for his confinement in life imprisonment. The complaint claims that the case of Roman Zadorov reflect widespread incompetence and/or corruption of the Israeli justice system. 
On such background, it is no surprise that the Administration of Courts had to launch an fraud imitative to suppress information regarding the fraud by Israeli judges...
 2016-06-20 US DHS assists in suppression of anti-corruption dissent in Israel_OpEdNews.com
 2016-07-12 ROMAN ZADOROV - the Israeli Mendel Beilis