On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:03 AM, joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net> wrote:
Mr Mellen:
I realized that the story you sent me regarding the habeas corpus petition was not the only alleged perversion of justice in your county, in Texas. It is the same pattern in Los Angeles County - false imprisonments - and alleged real estate frauds by the court go hand in hand.
False imprisonments in Los Angeles County are on a large scale - PBS program FRONTLINE estimated in 2000 the number of those who were falsely imprisoned in what came to be known as the Rampart scandal (1998-2000) between 8000-16,000 - the Rampart- FIPs. Hardly any of them were released (less than 200 by estimate), although the evidence was conclusively generated in the investigation that they were falsely convicted and falsely sentenced to long prison terms. It is an ongoing Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions, which still awaits its resolution.
More recently - we have the false jailing of Att RICHARD FINE - with no papers whatsoever to support his arrest or booking - over half a year in solitary confinement - off the inmate count, and off the records...
At the same time - we alleged racketeering of the Los Angeles Superior Court in real estate in the past 25 years - enabled through its case management systems, which the court wrongfully declared "privileged", With it - it concealed for the past 25 years the Registers of Actions (California dockets) in both civil and criminal litigation, the Books of Judgments - in both civil and criminal litigations, and also - it concealed the Rules of Courts pertaining to Entry of Judgment! To me - it sounds unbelievable every single time I write it.
I allege that the Los Angeles Superior Court managed an unprecedented feat, The traditions of Books of Judgment, and court records as Public Records go back to the early post medieval period. Through the introduction of digital technology, the court took the liberty of ceasing to comply with such ancient laws, and with that - took the court into the deep past. I recite all of these facts as a warning to all residents of the U.S. - because in my research I could not find a single computer system in the courts that was adequately validated (logic verified). It appears that what the Los Angeles Superior Court did 25 years ago, in various forms, and to various degrees was repeated in courts across the U.S. For example- in California there are over 70 such systems, each created by a court with no supervision. I was told that in Texas - the state courts may use more than 100 different case management systems - none of them, according to what I was told, was developed or installed following reasonable public scrutiny. You cannot underestimate the power of such systems in allowing alleged perversion of justice.
I recently sent a letter to the Clerk of the Court, JOHN CLARKE and to the Presiding Judge CHARLES MCCOY, and kindly asked that they finally, after a quarter century, disclose to the public the Rules of Court in re: Entry of Judgment.
I also pointed out to them a number of alleged Fraud on Their Faces records issued by the court - to deprive one person of Liberty, and another - of his home. I requested that they remove such records from the court files. It is obvious that the court treated such records as invalid on their faces, but by placing such records in court file - they allowed others to abuse the records to inflict harm, with the court's full knowledge and cooperation.
I also noticed the Presiding Judge CHARLES MCCOY and Judge DAVID YAFFE of the alleged fraud in their representation in the Habeas Corpus Petition of RICHARD FINE. Att KEVIN MCCORMICK appeared and filed false and deliberately misleading papers, evidence, and a declaration, on behalf of Judge DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT under his own signature with no signature of Judge DAVID YAFFE or any Officer of the Court - while he was Attorney, but NOT Attorney of Record, and had no authority to file such papers, evidence and declaration under his signature. Through such alleged fraud - Judge DAVID YAFFE, the LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, and Atty KEVIN MCCORMICK deprived RICHARD FINE of his Liberty.
Countrywide, the Los Angeles-based sub-prime-lender, who shares with the LA Superior Court the "Spirit of Los Angeles", was caught in 2007 in Houston Texas engaging in the same alleged fraud - allowing appearance in court by Attorney who was not Attorney of Record, and then felt at liberty to file false papers in court. In a March 2008 Memorandum Opinion, the Honorable JEFF BOHM, U.S. Judge, Houston, Texas, said of that scheme:
Countrywide and their counsel "have shown a disregard for the professional and ethical obligations of the legal profession and judicial system."
However, in Los Angeles County, such alleged fraud is legitimized and routine. The Los Angeles Superior Court, allows Countrywide - now a subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation to continue such alleged fraud to this very day - through the appearances of BRYAN CAVE, LLP - Attorney - but not Attorney of Record, who has appeared under the false and deliberately misleading Party Designation "NON PARTY" for over two years before judges of Los Angeles Superior Court, purported to file motions, to enter judgments, etc. However, in the Habeas Corpus Petition of RICHARD FINE - it was not Countrywide- an alleged corrupt corporation - but the Los Angeles Superior Court itself, and Judge DAVID YAFFE, who were parties to the litigation - and who engaged in the same scheme - to deprive RICHARD FINE of Liberty.
In my recent letters - I addressed the Presiding Judge a and the Clerk of the Court in their administrative capacities, Similarly, I addressed Judge Yaffe and the Presiding Judge regarding their conduct in the Habeas Corpus petition of RICHARD FINE - as parties to litigation, not as judges in any case.
The Clerk - JOHN A CLARKE - the Presiding Judge CHARLES MCCOY and Judge DAVID YAFFE refused to answer. Instead - they send me a letter by Counsel for the Court - FREDERICK BENNETT - stating that my letters amounted to "ex parte communications". It reminded me of the response I got last year from Mr ROBERT REED - Counsel for the House Judiciary Committee - he compared complaining about the alleged widespread corruption and racketeering of the Los Angeles Superior Courts - to "politization of the courts".
I usually disregard the letters for CARL BENNETT - the counsel for the court - since they are routinely false and deliberately misleading - simply a way to cover up the refusal of the Clerk of the Court and the Presiding Judge of the Court to be held accountable.. Here the issues were too heavy to ignore - I allege that the hiding of the Book of Judgments and the Rules of Court in re: Entity of Judgment and the Registers of Actions, in fact turned the court into an alleged racket, with ample evidence for conduct of an enterprise in pattern of alleged racketeering activity.
Case Management Systems of the Courts Must be the Center of Attention
The reason I state all of this is because I believe we need to start a site where readers would be able to rank of alleged corruption in different courts, based on the different reports. I claim Los Angeles is leading the pack leaving all others in the dust, but the stories form Texas are not far behind...
Of note - the former Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of our neighbor San Bernardino County - former member of the California Judicial Council, was also tied in a recent newspaper report to numerous real estate fraud cases. I believe that San Bernardino County is very close to LA County in the qualify of justice prevailing in it, but in general it suffers from under-reporting. I did receive several informal accounts - 2 cases regarding the family courts, and one regarding civil matters. If there is any truth in these accounts, then San Bernardino County is definitely up there as well.
Creating a Competitive Site - for Ranking Corruption of the Courts - Getting More Voters Involved
A site that would bring the true American tradition of Beauty Pageants to Court Corruption... would encourage people to report their cases, and it would allow readers to engage in an interactive manner. It will also create a database of individuals who are willing to make a statement and take a stand and probably also vote based on representatives responsiveness - or lack thereof - regarding alleged corruption of the courts. It is not meant to slight any of the cases, it is just a way to allow many more readers in California and Texas to become involved, and also in other states- it would greatly enlarge the group of identified voters of hold court corruption as a key issue in the U.S. today.
Request for a Special Counsel for Los Angeles County Public Records/Rules of Court/Integrity of Court Records
Otherwise - we are planning on sending a formal request to Attorney General Eric Holder in the very near future - to appoint a Special Counsel - to enforce in Los Angeles County the law pertaining to Access to Court Records, and Published Rules of Court,
Linking Alleged Court corruption to the Current Financial Crisis - which in fact is an Integrity Crisis.
The current "Financial Crisis" is in fact Justice System Crisis/Financial Crisis or simply stated - INTEGRITY CRISIS. Until the issue of integrity of the justice system would not be addressed in a meaningful way, the current malaise is not likely to be relieved. If Countrywide can continue today to appear in the Los Angeles Superior Court for the third year in a row as "NON PARTY", purport to file motions and enter judgments, which obviously demonstrates that the litigation as a whole is racketeered - with wholesale production of false and deliberately misleading court records, while SEC continues to refuses to investigate any complaints against Countrywide or Bank of America Corporation for the third year in a row, in this regard, then obviously not much changed in re: Banking Regulators and integrity of the U.S. banking system. Such conduct is also out of compliance with international Banking Accords that the U.S. claims to be good faith party to;
Going Abroad - International Human Rights Court
If there would be no response on that matter - we are in the process of trying to identify a group of 10 cases of the Los Angeles Superior Court, where alleged racketeering can be unequivocally demonstrable - based on routine creation of false and deliberately misleading court records by the court - by comparing the paper file and the hidden Registers of Actions and Electronic Minute Orders. It is a double/triple books system - which is why the Registers of Actions are hidden. We are getting close to the that target number. With 10 cases in place, we would try to identify an International Human Rights Court that would be willing to hear the case against the U.S. .Government - relative to allowing alleged abuse of the residents of Los Angeles County for over quarter century.
Establishing and maintaining fair and impartial tribunals, and also national tribunals for protection of Human Rights and Rights founded in the Constitution of the Country (and its Amendments in the case of the U.S.) are essential Human Rights pursuant to ratified International Law, binding the U.S., who in fact was the driving force behind the creation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - through Elenor Roosevelt.. We allege severe deprivation of Human Rights in LA County,. California. Obviously - allowing large scale false imprisonment - of the Rampart-FIPs - a decade after the investigation ended - would be a major part of such allegations. However, alleged racketeering by the LA Superior Court would be inseparable from that story as well - we allege that had the Registers of Actions and Book of Judgment been public records, as required by law, we would have been able to speedily identify the Rampart-FIPs, and take up their cases with the U.S. Courts. As things stand - they are all anonymous.
Mr Mellen - I hope to hear your comments on the agenda above.
Joseph Zernik
No comments:
Post a Comment