09-12-06 Asking the U.S. Secret Service to come clean on Kozinski Fraud and Kozinski Culture...

Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:45:16 -0800
To: "Jz12345@Earthlink. Net"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Kozinski Fraud & Kozinski Culture: The solution? It's the computers, %&$#$@! Asking U.S. Secret Service to come clean... Timely response requested within 48 hours.
Bcc:
December 6, 2009

U.S. Secret Service

Jeffrey Boothe (BPD)
Timothy Buckley (VPD)
United States Secret Service

The favor of a response within 48 hours is requested.

Dear Mr Boothe and Mr Buckley:

You have been following my communications for many months now, as evidenced by your responses. In my requests to Office of Attorney General in 2008, for Equal Protection of 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, abused by the LA Superior Court in collusion with some at the U.S. courts, and for my Equal Protection - against abuse by Countrywide and Bank of America, in collusion with the court, I explicitly requested to keep FBI out of any enforcement action related to the courts in LA. FBI was part of the corruption in Los Angeles County.

Where did the Secret Service fall in this case? It remained unclear. The one veteran US Secret Service agent, whom I met, and with whom I discussed the matter, gave me very helpful advise. He also impressed me as honest. But then again, nobody else from your agency ever responded.

In my complaints to inspectors generals of U.S. agencies, I described the conduct of federal law-enforcement agencies, who refused to respond regarding their primary investigational or oversight jurisdiction, as a shell game, nothing more, and a unified front in refusal to enforce the law.

However, in a rare moment of generosity, a senior member of another federal agency informed me that the Secret Service did have primary investigational jurisdiction over large computer systems. Therefore, refusal by the Secret Service to respond on such matter, might be deemed as even worse than the typical shell game - possibly more along the lines of Misprision of Felonies.

Old Flimflam

Therefore, I would be grateful for your timely response on only one question:
Does the United States Secret Service hold primary investigational jurisdiction regarding fraud alleged in my complaints regarding key computer systems, as detailed below?

1) Key government computer systems:
a) SUSTAIN - the case management system of the LA Superior Court, civil division (details would be provided upon request).
b) NAME UNKNOWN - - the case management system of the LA Superior Court, criminal division (details would be provided upon request).
c) PACER & CM/ECF - in all U.S. district courts and courts of appeals, where PACER users were denied access to NEFs.
d) PACER & CM/ECF - as implemented at U.S. district court, LA, where in addition, public access was denied to Calendar of the Courts, and Docket Activity Report.
e) PACER & CM/ECF - as implemented at the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, where the initials of deputy clerks in docketing text, which in PACER & CM/ECF platform of U.S. district courts were linked to digital signatures, were allowed to be displayed, however, with no links to digital signatures, creating a blatantly false and deliberately misleading system.

f) Inmate Information Center - as implemented at the Sheriff's Department, Los Angeles County. It is a hazard to Liberty itself.[added to the online version-jz]

2) Key financial institution systems:
a) EDGE - the underwriting monitoring system at Countrywide, now part of Bank of America (details would be provided upon request).
Any response on the matter would be gratefully received,

The favor of a response within 48 hours is requested.

Respectfully,
__/s/________
Joseph Zernik

A. CC
1) Prof Richard Posner

2) Law school faculty.

3) U.S. Dept of Justice, Inspector General Glenn A Fine, as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.

4) Other Inspector Generals

5) U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights

6) Basel Accords Committee

B. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.
__________________________________________