09-12-24 Let's make is simple and crude- the courts engage in fake actions, issue fake orders, judgments, which resulted in the fake imprisonment of Richard Fine.

     
Fake Vuitton bags _ _ _Fake lawn_ _ _ _ Fake ID_ _ _ _ _ __ _Fake pregnancy rumor_ _Fake Ferrari
     
Fake boobs _ _ _ _ _ _Fake money_ _ _ _  Fake McDonald_ _ _ Fake Castro_ _ _ _ _ Fake crack
___________________
Hi Shirley, hi all:
Thank you for your wikipedia input.  Let's hope that it would do the job, convincing the reviewers that the Richard Fine story was not an insignificant "local story"... 
For anybody else who wished to voice an opinion against deletion as a "local story".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Isaac_Fine
However, Shirley, your note to me showed that you were still confused. Therefore - I definitely flunked the job!
Let me try one more time, in simple lay language.  Sorry if I got a bit crude - whatever it takes...
___________________
THE COURTS ROUTINELY RUN FAKE LITIGATIONS, WHICH THE COURTS THEMSELVES CONSIDER NOTHING AT ALL, AND WHICH LEAD TO FAKE ARRESTS AND FAKE IMPRISONMENTS...
_____________
A. The case of Richard Fine involved fake litigations in a chain-reaction:
1) Marina v LA County (BS109420) - at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
FAKE LITIGATION -- where LA Superior Court fakely arrested Richard Fine in open court with no warrant, no conviction, no sentencing, and no Register of Actions (California docket).
2) Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) -  at the US Court, Central District of California, Los Angeles.
FAKE HABEAS CORPUS PETITION -- a fake review by the US District Court, where the US District Court issued fake orders and judgments, and where the US District Court fakely found OK the FAKE LITIGATION -- where LA Superior Court fakely arrested Richard Fine in open court with no warrant, no conviction, no sentencing, and no Register of Actions (California docket).
3) Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) - at the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
FAKE EMERGENCY PETITION -- a fake review by the US Court of Appeals and its Chief Judge Alex Kozinski,  where the US Court of Appeals issued fake orders and judgments, and where the US Court of Appeals fakely found OK the FAKE HABEAS CORPUS PETITION -- a fake review by the US District Court, where the US District Court issued fake orders and judgments, and where the US District Court fakely found OK the FAKE LITIGATION -- where the LA Superior Court fakely arrested Richard Fine in open court with no warrant, no conviction, no sentencing, and no Register of Actions (California docket).
I wish I could fit it to some popular tune...
______________
B. Los Angeles county sheriff routinely subjected dissidents to fake hospitalizations (including fake psychiatric hospitatlizations).
That is why Richard Fine was held all along under fake hospitalization, not in the jail itself, and that was why I was asking for help from medical associations - to denounce the practice of the LA Sheriff, of fake hospitalizations to cover up fake imprisonments of dissidents, and to start review procedures against doctors who signed on such fake hospitalizations. It was and is serious human rights violations by such doctors.
______________
C. State and US courts today were equipped with fake case management systems to do the job.
That is what Alex Kozinski Frauds are all about, which are enabled by Ronald George Computer Systems.
______________
WELCOME TO THE MEDIEVAL DIGITAL ERA!
   
______________
Truly,

Joe Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Patriotic pics of sharon stone, beyonce knowles, and charlize theron,
Soon also - deep house music!
P.S. please give me case number and captions for the jakarian cases, both state and federal. I would like to check them out, just in case.
______________
At 16:00 24/12/2009, Shirley Piggot, MD, wrote:

I have just published, I think, the following on Wikipedia.  Please verify. 
Is there anything on Facebook? If so, please send the links.
===[[Richard Isaac Fine]]===
Strongly oppose deletion:
Although I live in Texas, I have become aware that the unlawful incarceration of Richard Fine is a major human rights issue.  I have personally verified, some months ago, through a complicated series of phone calls that Richard Fine is or was, in fact, incarcerated in the Los Angeles County prison system.  This information was not easily obtained, but required persistence on my part and a determination not to be dissuaded. When I finally was able to confirm Dr. Zernik's allegations regarding Fine's imprisonment, I was told that no other information was available to me because he was a "high profile prisoner".  Dr. Zernik has tirelessly tried to go through normal government channels to get Los Angeles County and other responsible persons to do their duties and provide Richard Fine justice; he has also unsuccessfully tried to elicit the cooperation of the media.  He has faced active suppression.  God only knows what Richard Fine himself has faced.
What I don't know, but would like to find out, is whether a Writ of Habeas Corpus has ever been filed, and if so, what is the court's response. 
In addition to the case of Richard Fine, I have personal knowledge of the confinement, also presumably illegal, of my friend and medical colleague, Jacques Jaikaran MD, in the Houston Federal Detention Center under the order of Judge Lynn Hughes. One might be able to say that Dr. Jaikaran is not a person of note.  However, Judge Lynn Hughes is, and it is evident to me that Judge Hughes is guilty of judicial misconduct. 
Has any judge made any ruling in the case of Richard Fine? If not, he is most certainly illegally incarcerated, and that is news.

______________

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 5:07 PM, joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net> wrote:

Hi Juli, hi Bouldergeist, hi all:

I am grateful to both of you for your help and your entries to oppose deletion by wikipedia. I hope that it would do the job. Well written.

Anybody else who would be willing during the long holiday weekend to oppose the move to delete from wikipedia, would be appreciated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Isaac_Fine#Richard_Isaac_Fine  

I hope that you realize that it was tricky writing to wikipedia's specs on a matter that was pending, and was ruled upon by corrupt courts. By definition, wikipedia takes court rulings in the matter to be the truth.

Regardless, with the plethora of websites on the matter, I felt that there was a need to establish the basic indisputable facts in the matter as an easily accessible resource for the public at large.

I did not want to comment on the facts in the discussion page in wikipedia, out of concern of making the discussion there even more confusing:

 1) Your comment about "open to the public as court records" was incorrect.  The LA court denied access to the register of actions (California docket) of Fine's purported case - Marina v LA County (BS109420) - all along. I have correspondence with the court counsel on this matter.  Again - such correspondence constituted  primary records that wikipedia would not accept.

2) The habeas corpus, the petitions, and the appeals to the US Court of Appeals, 9th circuit, must all be deemed false procedures, if only for the fact that they were all conducted without such records that were the quintessential documents for establishing the foundation for review in any case.

3) The general notion that Fine was arrested and was jailed for contempt, whether it was for attempting to disqualify Yaffe, as claimed by some, or whether it was for denying the authority of Murray Gross, as claimed by others, was incorrect as well.

The true facts in the matter:

1) There was and there is no way to establish that Marina v LA County (BS109420) was ever a case litigated as a matter under the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of California.  The facts in the matter show that it was not.

2) There was and there is no warrant for the arrest of Richard Fine.

3) There was and there is no conviction and no sentencing for contempt in the case of Richard Fine.

4) Richard Fine was in fact arbitrarily arrested and was falsely confined. 

5) Richard Fine, and another LA attorney who filed complaints on judicial corruption, Ron Gottschalk, were both subjected to warrantless arrests, and were both falsely hospitalized.  Ron Gottschalk was released on bail.  Richard Fine was still under false hospitalization. 

Such were the routine methods of the Soviet Union for handling dissidents.

The damning silence of media and the legal profession:

I cannot write any of that in wikipedia - it would be legal conclusions that were not supported by existing court rulings or published media/expert reports.  Yet, media would not report, and legal experts would not comment on the matter.  Why major media outlets would not cover the story? Why no legal expert would comment? Why no attorney would go on the record on the matter?

Senior Executive Producer at NBC, who was personally very interested in the story, told me he could not cover it - "corporate decision".

I was and I am advised by the legal director of a civil rights organization from outside LA in this matter, but it was all done incognito, hush, hush.

You got to wonder regarding the nature of society, free speech, the legal profession, and the justice system of the US at this time.

 

Joe Zernik

At 11:54 24/12/2009, you wrote:

I posted an oppose delete.  I am on YouTube, "Your Honor", Juli Star-Alexander.

______________

--- On Wed, 12/23/09, joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net> wrote:

From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>

Subject: Los Angeles seeking texas help... against wikipedia deletion of Richard Fine story.

To: jz12345@earthlink.net

Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 6:09 PM

Hi all:

As part of an effort to establish a baseline on a story that was not well covered by media, I created a few short entries in wikipedia,  They were easy reference to anyone who wanted to figure out the overall picture.

The three entries were:

Richard Isaac Fine:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Isaac_Fine

Rampart FIPs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rampart-FIPs_(Falsely_Imprisoned_Persons)

Notice of Electronic Filing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notice_of_Electronic_Filing

Now, someone started a move to delete the story of Fine on the grounds of insignificance - a local story at best.  In the big picture of persons covered in wikipedia, from sports to pornstars, I deeply believe that Richard Fine deserves a place there.

I am seeking your input, especially if you are not from LA, at the following page (you need to generate a free user ID first):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Isaac_Fine

Please state what part of the country you were from, since the "local story" was the main reason proposed for the deletion, together with lack of coverage by national media - which of course was part of the issue why he was still in jail - the failure of media to cover the story.

Thanks for your help.

Joe Zernik

--

The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.