10-01-02 Is Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor a racketeer? (in lay parlance)

_ _ _
Justice Sotomayor_  _ _ _ _ _Scott Huminski


Continued discussion of Summary Order issued in 2004 in the name of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, when she served as Circuit Judge on US Court of Appeals, 2nd District - albeit with no signature and no NEF.


Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:52:59 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
From: jz
Reply-To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com, johnwolfgram@hotmail.com
Subject: I wonder if Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor should be deemed
 racketeer (in lay parlance)
Cc: zernik



Hi Mr Wolf, Hi All:

Does extortion really apply when the deceived/extorted person is Plaintiff, who came to US Court, or US Court of Appeals of his own will?

Regardless, I assumed that the deprivation of implied guarantee of honest services still remained, which I believed was a predicated act for RICO, and likewise, the mail-fraud still remained (albeit mail fraud was a complicated one). Next - one had to examine, if the US Court or US Court of Appeals engaged in the practice sufficient number of times, and satisfied the other elements of RICO - which I believed were all satisfied as well...

Therefore,  the practice of issuing and serving orders with no valid NEFs, albeit some were signed by judges or magistrates, should be deemed racketeering by the respective US Courts or US Court of Appeals.  

Therefore, in the particular case of Scott X: If Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor were found to have caused the issuance and service of such fraudulent, false and deliberately misleading orders, alternatively - caused the issuance and service of orders depriving litigants of implied guarantee of honest services in sufficient numbers relative to time frames specified by RICO, she should be deemed racketeer  (in lay parlance).

Regardless, I believe that upon review by a Human Rights Court, pursuant to ratified International Law, the United States government would be found in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - for failure to maintain honest and impartial National Tribunal for the protection of Human Rights and the rights pursuant to the Constitution of this Country and its Amendments. 

Truly,

Joseph Zernik

http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 

Patriotic pics of sharon stone, beyonce knowles, and charlize theron,

To be added soon- deep house music! 

At 10:21 02/01/2010, Wolf wrote:
You're right Joe. When fraud loses its deceitful charcter and becomes merely coercive, it becomes "Extortion."

Wolf

Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:50:03 -0800 Zernik wrote:
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com; s_huminski@live.com
From: jz12345@earthlink.net
Subject: Scott - I wonder if you lost any claim of "reliance" after my repeated notices to you...

Hi Scott, Hi All:

I believe that following my repeated, detailed notices to you, regarding fraud perpetrated against you in various US Courts, you may not be able in good faith to claim reliance, as an element of fraud, after this date.

Therefore, if you continue to litigate in US District Court, Brattleboro, Vermont, it may no longer constitute fraud by the court and opposing counsel.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Patriotic pics of sharon stone, beyonce knowles, and charlize theron,
To be added soon- deep house music! 

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.