10-07-18 Fraud On Court by Judge David Yaffe in the Richard Fine Case

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:58:30 +0300
To: ronald gottschalk , "Leslie Dutton"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Fwd: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
Cc: "Fred Sottile" , Mardi

Hi Attorney Gottschalk, Hi Ms Dutton:

Reading the news report below, it appears that Ms Dutton is still missing the point.

Judge David Yaffe was never assigned as presiding judge in Marina v LA County.  Therefore, he never had any intention to review the question, whether or not he should have recused.  Obviously, you cannot recuse when you have never been duly assigned.

In short: Marina v LA County, from the start was pretense litigation.  After all - Los Angeles County was Defendant, and was acting in violation of the law.  There was never any intention to conduct true litigation in the case.

There are numerous signs to support that claim. To name just two:
a) None of the court minutes, orders, writs, judgments in the case were ever authenticated. Therefore, they were all void, not voidable - including, but not limited to the March 4, 2009 "Judgment for Contempt". 
b) Additionally, Judge Yaffe absolutely refused to issue an Appointment Order for Commissioner Gross - because you cannot issue a valid Appointment Order in a pretense litigation.

However, the definitive proof for the claim of pretense litigation in Marina v LA County would found be in the Register of Actions (California civil docket) of Marina v LA County, which the Los Angeles Superior Court denies access to for over a year in violation of First Amendment rights.

Full Disclosure Network would do a great service to Richard Fine and to all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County by pressing for access to the Register of Action in the case.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine


Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.

WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?

*     "Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]

[i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
[ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
[iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

LINKS:April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: ronald gottschalk
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM
Subject: Fwd: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
To:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leslie Dutton-Full Disclosure
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:36 PM
Subject: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
To:

Judge Admits Fraud On Court
In Richard Fine Contempt Case

July 19, 2010

Judge David P. Yaffe:  "Court never intended to find as to whether Mr. Fine had standing to file a verified statement of disqualification" .....

Preview of Full Series 

 Los Angeles, CA  The Full Disclosure Network has learned that Superior Court Judge David Yaffe has admitted that court documents filed in the contempt case of Richard I Fine contained "false information".  According to new documents filed just last week Judge Yaffe has reversed himself  saying that "the Court never intended to find that Richard Fine did not have standing to challenge him from sitting on the case."

ISSUE: SHOULD JUDGE YAFFE HAVE RECUSED HIMSELF?
A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Justice Andrew Kleinfeld issued Fine a Certificate of Appeal ability on the single issue as to whether or not the Trial Court Judge (Yaffe) should have been disqualified. Based on the new documents filed by Yaffe one could speculate that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal and the U. S. District Court might have had a different outcome had they the complete, accurate documentation been before them. 

FALSE STATEMENTS BY THE COURT AT ISSUE
In a letter to the U S Supreme Court Dr. Fine cites two new Minute Orders filed almost two years later that describe how the Federal District Court and the U. S. Supreme Court Courts were misled by Yaffe and his attorney Kevin McCormick.  This admission is found in the  July 13, 2010 Order and another was dated June 18, 2010  but inexplicably filed some twenty-five days later on July 13, 2010 by Clerk of the Court John Clark. It was not until Richard Fine filed a "Fraud Upon The Court" action with the District Court and US Supreme Court the that new documents appeared. 
    
Read Full Report & Details Here

  Real News.....
Real Issues.....Real People.....



Richard Fine Appeals to U S Supreme Court
AGAIN!
Fine's letter to the Supreme Court states: "Judge Yaffe deliberately made false statements in his March 27, 2008Order that referenced and relied upon a March 18, 2008 Order and the July 13, 2010 Order confirms that no such order existed....deliberate false statements of Judge Yaffe were made to fraudulently induce any subsequent court order to rely on...and base its judgment upon such false statements."

• READ FULL DISCLOSURE REPORT HERE
  
  
• Read Fine's Letter To Supreme Court
• Richard I Fine files New Demand for Release with U S Supreme Court
• Court Transcript: Judge Yaffe Admission as witness while sitting as Judge on the case

WHAT IS THE FULL DISCLOSURE NETWORK�?